ARTICLE
17 January 2018

Reading Between The Blurred Lines

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
The FTC recently released a Staff Report regarding consumer recognition of native and search advertising entitled "Blurred Lines", summarizing its findings from its self-styled "exploratory research".
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

The Federal Trade Commission recently released a Staff Report regarding consumer recognition of native and search advertising entitled "Blurred Lines", summarizing its findings from its self-styled "exploratory research". Unsurprisingly, the FTC concluded that the use of disclosures consistent with prior FTC guidance increased the likelihood that consumers would recognize online ads as ads.

The FTC's testing consisted of taking samples of search and native advertising (4 of each, half on desktop implementations and half on mobile displays) and making changes to the pages to improve the ad disclosures (for example, by changing the term "Sponsored" to "Ad", changing the colors and fonts of the disclosures, and changing background shading). Results were assessed on the basis of observations of 48 participants and eye tracking data. While the observations confirmed an increase in ad recognition, even with such disclosures, a "significant percentage" of the participants nonetheless did not recognize that the ads were ads.

Although the Report readily acknowledges the statistical and scientific limitations of its testing, the FTC interprets the results as justifying its native and digital advertising guidance. Of course, the FTC Report did not purport to analyze the impact on the effectiveness of Ads with "improved" disclosures, nor is it likely that the FTC would be very sympathetic if the improved disclosures advocated by the Report resulted in less effective advertising (typically measured by clicks and conversions).

Takeaway: The Report makes clear that the FTC continues to place a high priority on ensuring that consumers can recognize advertising when it is presented to them and will continue to take enforcement action when necessary. Accordingly, marketers and publishers must remain keenly aware of and observe the FTC's guidance for digital advertising and specifically for native advertising.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More