ARTICLE
16 January 2018

DACA Dreams Again Through The Courts: What Do We Know And What Should Employers Do Now?

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Federal district court in California issues an injunction ordering the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to accept Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) renewal applications ...
United States Immigration

Seyfarth Synopsis: Federal district court in California issues an injunction ordering the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to accept Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) renewal applications while a lawsuit challenging DACA's termination remains ongoing. It is currently unknown whether DHS will agree to accept these applications, but it is expected the Department will appeal the court's ruling.

Quick Facts: U.S. District Judge William Alsup ruled that DHS must accept renewal applications while a legal challenge to DACA's termination proceeds through the court system. The court's injunction ensures that safeguards against deportation remain in place for the nearly 800,000 DACA recipients across the country.

Judge Alsup ordered DHS to issue a public notice and renewal instruction for eligible DACA beneficiaries; DHS has yet to communicate whether it will accept renewal applications per the court's order. As of this posting, DHS' DACA 2017 webpage now notes: "Jan. 10, 2018: This page is under review. More information is forthcoming." Experts expect DHS to appeal the ruling-in the interim requesting a stay-and for a long court battle to follow, perhaps culminating at the Supreme Court. Alternatively, Congress may pass legislation that provides legal status for DACA recipients, rendering the case moot. In fact, on January 9th, President Trump told bipartisan Congressional leaders that he wants a bill to allow immigrants who were brought to the country illegally as children to remain in the United States.

Background: Previously, the Trump Administration announced its plans to terminate the DACA program on March 5, 2018. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has planned to continue to issue EADs for current beneficiaries whose benefits will expire between September 5, 2017 and March 5, 2018 that have been accepted as of October 5, 2017 for a two-year time period.

What Should Employers Consider?: The termination of DACA could result in the forced removal of hundreds of thousands of employees from the legal workforce over the next two and a half years. While the case continues, employers may wish to ascertain the amount of DACA recipients in their employ. Recent Form I-9 guidance and auto-extension rules now force employers to review certain employment eligibility basis codes. Reviewing these category codes, which are listed on EADs, may provide a starting place to assess the impact of the loss of DACA recipients on a company's workforce. However, this type of undertaking should be carefully considered with the assistance of competent counsel to ensure that there are no anti-discrimination based missteps. Seyfarth will issue an update when and if DHS begins to accept renewal applications and as major developments in the case occur.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More