United States: Investors' Attempts to Breathe Life Back into Long-Lapsed Life Insurance Policies Fail

Last Updated: January 3 2018
Article by Dawn B. Williams

In recent years, there have been a number of lawsuits seeking to revive long-lapsed universal life insurance policies based on alleged technical deficiencies in the grace notices. Many of these cases have similar facts: the original owners purchased high-value, flexible-premium life insurance on elderly individuals; the owners stopped paying premiums years ago; the policies lapsed; an investor purchased the lapsed policies for the sole purpose of bringing a lawsuit against the insurance company; and the investors eventually bring suit, usually on the eve of applicable statute of limitations. As the facts imply, the policies often are suspected stranger-originated life insurance (STOLI). The legal underpinnings are also related, as the lawsuits involve claims for breach of contract and declaratory relief on the theory that the grace notices were deficient.

The information that an insurer includes on a grace notice and the mechanics of when it will be mailed out and to whom depends on the contract itself and relevant state statutes; therefore, the outcome of any particular case is largely dependent on the terms of the insurance policy and which state's law governs. See, e.g., Weiss v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., 2016 WL 4991533, at 4 (E.D.N.Y. Sept. 15, 2016) (finding a requirement for an "amount due" in both the contract and the state statute under certain circumstances). Some of the early opinions found there were factual issues that precluded dismissal at the pleading stage, which had the effect of encouraging plaintiff's counsel to bring other cases. See Blumenberg v. Aviva Life & Annuity Co. of N.Y., 41 Misc. 3d 1207, 977 N.Y.S. 2d 665 (Supreme Ct., Kings Co. 2013); Zeligfeld v. Phoenix Life Ins. Co., 39 Misc. 3d 1213, 975 N.Y.S.2d 370 (Supreme Ct., Kings Co. 2013).

As the first round of cases advanced to the summary judgment stage, a federal court in New York held that a grace notice which improperly stated the amount required to remove the policy from grace, coupled with evidence that the owner had tendered some amount of premium, was ineffective to lapse the policy under New York law. Lebovits v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., 199 F. Supp. 3d 678, 680 (E.D.N.Y. 2016). That victory was pyrrhic for the investor-plaintiff, however, as the court also required the owner to pay past-due premiums for nearly six years. Id. at 682. Because the owner failed to do so, the court ultimately entered judgment for the insurer.

Though investors have had mixed success with these cases, see Weiss v. Sec. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., A.D.2d, 45 N.Y.S.3d 169 (2d Dep't Jan. 11, 2017) (affirming summary judgment for insurer), this fact has not slowed the pace of the complaints being filed. To the contrary, similar allegations continue to be lodged against numerous insurers. See Jakobovits v. PHL Variable Ins. Co., No. 17-3527 (E.D.N.Y., filed June 12, 2017); Jakobovits v. Lincoln Nat'l Life Ins. Co., No. 17-05344 (S.D.N.Y., filed July 14, 2017). Notably, most of the cases that have been and continue to be brought are in New York, frustrating insurers' ability to argue that the policies are void ab initio as part of a STOLI scheme due to the age of the policies. Kramer v. Phoenix Life Ins. Co., 15 N.Y.3d 539, 549 n.5 (N.Y. 2010) (provisions of N.Y. Ins. Law § 7815, making STOLI illegal, do not apply to policies prior to May, 2010).

It is against this backdrop that the Southern District of New York recently granted in part an insurer's motion for summary judgment. Jakobovits v. Allianz Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., 2017 WL 3049538 (S.D.N.Y. July 18, 2017). In Jakobovits, the Court granted summary judgment for the insurer on six of the nine investor-owned lapsed policies at issue because the owners had not given notice of assignment to the insurer per the terms of the policy. As to the other three policies, it found that the plaintiff had breached the policies by not paying premium and that the insurance company did not breach the literal terms of the policies with respect to grace notices that overstated the amount of premium due to keep the policy in force because the policies did not require an amount to be stated at all, but decided that a factual issue remained as to whether the insurer breached the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing.

The case involves nine life insurance policies insuring the lives of three individuals. Id. at *1. Aside from two small premium payments on two of the policies, no payments other than the initial premium payments were ever made on the policies, all of which lapsed in 2009 and 2010 due to nonpayment of premium. Id. Prior to lapse, the owners were notified that the policies were in grace. Id. at *2. None of the policy owners attempted to tender any amount of premium. Id.

For six of the nine policies, the Court granted complete summary judgment for the insurer, finding that the insurer was not notified of changes in ownership in accordance with the terms of the policies. Id. at *5. The ownership of the policies was transferred between various entities, and the policies provided that assignment would be effective upon notice to the insurer. Id. It was undisputed, however, that other than notice of an initial transfer, the owners never subsequently provided the insurance company with such notice. Id. Consequently, "the purported transfers... were ineffective to give Plaintiff an insurable interest in them," resulting in plaintiff's "lack of standing" to sue on those six policies and summary judgment for the insurer. Id.

While the chain of ownership was anything but complete for the remaining three policies, the Court found that factual issues precluded summary judgment on the notice aspect of those policies. Turning to the merits, the court first found that "[t]he question of Plaintiff's breach is, as a threshold matter, not in dispute." Id. Because plaintiff failed to pay any premium, it materially breached the contract. Id. That did not end the inquiry, however. The court had to also determine whether the insurer "itself breached and thereby caused the policy owners to stop paying." Id. at *6. Denying the investor-plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment, the Court reviewed the language of the policy, which did not require that the grace notice contain any amount, and held that the company committed no "actual breach" of the policy's terms. Id. at *6-*7 (distinguishing Weiss, where the "terms of the policy" "required the Grace Notice to state the amount due").

The court found factual issues remained, however, on plaintiff's claim of breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. Plaintiff's theory, in this and the other similar cases, was that the insurer "intentionally demanded excessive premiums in an effort to force these policies into lapse." Id. at *7. Despite the insurer's evidence that it did not do so, plaintiffs were able to marshal sufficient material at the summary judgment stage to convince the court that triable issues of fact remained. Id. The court concluded that plaintiff's declaratory judgment claim was duplicative of its breach of contract claim, and therefore granted summary judgment for the insurer on that claim. Id. at *8.

Jakobovits is a step forward for insurers who face allegations that alleged technical deficiencies in grace notifications, often sent many years in the past, require the reinstatement of potentially millions of dollars in life insurance. It stands for the propositions that an owner unequivocally breaches when he or she does not pay premium; that a company does not breach the policy by including an incorrect amount in the grace notice if the policy does not include a requirement that the grace notice state the amount due; and that an owner must comply with the notification provisions of the insurance policy in order to have standing to sue on the policy.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions