ARTICLE
21 November 2017

Jumping Into The Deep End: Amendment Practice Post-Aqua Products

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
In this article published by Bloomberg Law's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, authors David Cavanaugh and Michael Smith provide context for issues discussed in the Aqua Products decision...
United States Intellectual Property

In this article published by Bloomberg Law's Patent, Trademark & Copyright Journal, authors David Cavanaugh and Michael Smith provide context for issues discussed in the Aqua Products decision, identify potential implications for practitioners, and provide perspectives on next steps for the PTO on motion to amend practice.

Excerpt: In the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit's recent en banc decision in Aqua Products, a deeply ractured court provides a glimpse into the perspectives that some of the judges have on post-grant practice at the US Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). The decision addresses who should bear the burden of persuasion when a motion to amend is filed in an inter partes review. Read the full article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More