United States: Which Trademark Came First, BUTTERBALL Turkey Or BUTTERBALL Ham?

Last Updated: November 21 2017
Article by David A. Kluft

We used to have a Thanksgiving turkey tradition at the Trademark and Copyright Law Blog. Just before every fourth Thursday of November, we'd type in our LEXIS NEXIS password and find a judicial opinion from a turkey trademark case.  We covered the 2007 genericide of the TURKEY STICK, explained the 1976 GOBBLE GOBBLE  dispute, and even discussed the 1981 fight over BAKED TAM. Great tradition, and as New Englanders we felt a certain obligation to continue it. But there are only so many turkey trademark cases out there. Like the best side dish at your Thanksgiving dinner, at some point, you run out.

BUTTERBALL to the rescue! The venerable BUTTERBALL turkey's recent trademark fight with newcomer BUTTERBALL HAM resolved just in time for us to write about it this year. Not interested?  What if I told you that BUTTERBALL HAM may not have been the newcomer after all ... and also that the origin of the BUTTERBALL turkey mark is a bit shrouded in mystery?

The Butterball  Turkey Story

Here's the story of the BUTTERBALL turkey trademark, as told collectively by Wikipedia, Butterball, LLC's official website, and a helpful blogger (if you are a trademark lawyer, please bear with me because not all of this makes perfect sense): The first application to register the BUTTERBALL trademark (for "Live and Dressed" poultry, as well as "Sandwiches, Eggs and Fresh Vegetables") was made by Ada Walker of Wyoming, Ohio. Walker claimed to have been using the mark since 1938, and her application was filed on September 5, 1939, just days after Hitler invaded Poland. You can see her registration certificate here.

Who was Ada Walker? Was she a farmer or a deli owner (given the location, the former seems more likely, but then why register the mark for sandwiches)? Was she, like her contemporary Horace Longacre, taking up poultry farming in order to secure a military deferment for a male relative? Did she make up the term "Butterball" herself or did it come from some older tradition? We just don't know.

Anyway, in 1951, Leo Peters purchased the trademark from Walker for $10.  Having collected the interesting mark, Peters didn't know what to use it for at first (like I said, some of this story doesn't really pass muster), so while he was deciding, he licensed it to a Chicago meat processing company, Swift & Co., famous for having retained its status as a major food company even after serving as a poster child and punching bag for Teddy' Roosevelt's trust-busting crusade a few decades earlier.

The first BUTTERBALL brand turkey reportedly was sold by Swift in 1954. Based on trademark assignment records, the product must have been a hit because Leo Peters permanently and formally licensed or assigned the registration to Swift in 1956.  Peters apparently retained non-poultry related rights in the BUTTERBALL mark and, in the late 1950's or early 1960's, founded Butterball Farms, Inc., a butter company in Grand Rapids, Michigan, that is still in business but has nothing to do with turkey.

Swift and the BUTTERBALL turkey mark went through a ton of mergers and spin-offs over the years. Swift found itself at various times sharing corporate forms with Beatrice Foods, Globe Life Insurance, Playtex, ConAgra and many other brands that may or may not conjure up warm Thanksgiving feelings. In 2006, the BUTTERBALL mark and poultry business were chipped off and merged with the Carolina Turkeys Company. The new company now does business in North Carolina as Butterball, LLC. With 1 billion pounds shipped annually, Butterball, LLC is the largest distributor of turkey products in the United States.

By the time Butterball, LLC was formed, Ada Walker's original registration had been allowed to expire (in 2001), but that registration had been replaced with a ton of others, including what we have come to recognize as the famous BUTTERBALL logo for turkey, which was registered in the 1980's, and claims a first use date of 1962.

The Curious (Re)Emergence of Butterball Ham

Ok, now let's talk about Butterball Ham. In 2014, the Joseph Sanders Meat company of Custer, Michigan ("Sanders"), applied to the United States Trademark and Patent Office ("USPTO") to register BUTTERBALL HAM for ham products.  Around the same time, Sanders also started snapping up domain names with the BUTTERBALL name in them, and even applied to the Michigan Secretary of State to change its d/b/a to the "Butterball Ham Company."  The USPTO put a wrench in these plans by rejecting the trademark application on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with Butterball, LLC's preexisting turkey registrations, which by that time also included ham and other meats. So Sanders abandoned its trademark application.

End of story, right?  No, the story continues for two reasons.  First, Sanders (now firmly on the radar of Butterball, LLC) kept selling BUTTERBALL HAM. Second, the date of first use claimed on Sanders' applications was 1960, two years before anything claimed on Butterball, LLC's live registrations, which seemed to indicate that there was much more to the backstory. So what gives? Was Sanders somehow related to Leo Peters' Butterball Farms (also in Michigan)?  Was Joseph Sanders some long-lost licensee or relative of Ada Walker?

Turkey v. Ham

In 2014, Butterball, LLC tried to negotiate a resolution with Sanders, but to no avail.  After settlement talks broke down, in 2015 Butterball, LLC filed a trademark infringement action against Sanders in the Eastern District of North Carolina.

Sanders moved to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Sanders' current owner, Derek Sanders, submitted an affidavit stating that Sanders was simply a family-run business with just one location, four delivery trucks and a commercial footprint that barely reaches outside Michigan, let alone all the way to North Carolina. The Court denied the motion on the ground that Sanders maintained an interactive website that advertised the ability to ship meats all over the place, and Sanders did not deny that this included North Carolina.

All in all, not a very interesting motion, except that Derek Sanders' affidavit also sort of implied without explanation that Sanders might have been selling BUTTERBALL branded products since 1925, not 1960 as claimed on the trademark applications! Sure enough, consistent with this earlier date, Sanders' pre-litigation website stated that Sanders has sold its "time-tested ... truly authentic old-fashioned Butterball ham," since the 1920's.

After the motion to dismiss was denied, Sanders answered and counterclaimed, alleging that Sanders' ham, not Butterball's turkey, was the first product to use the BUTTERBALL mark. Through this pleading, we finally got a bit more of Sanders' story. Sanders Meats was founded in 1925 by Joseph Sanders, who delivered meats in a single Model T Ford, and allegedly began selling BUTTERBALL HAM in the 1930's (in case you were keeping score, this is the third priority date offered by Sanders). Although Butterball, LLC implied in its complaint that it discovered Sanders' use of the BUTTERBALL mark only in 2014, Sanders alleged that the plaintiff's predecessor in interest, Swift, knew that Sanders was the senior user of the mark since 1969, when the parties entered into an (apparently unwritten) co-existence arrangement.

Unanswered Questions

With all these conflicting historical claims, this promised to be a very hot lawsuit. But in 2017, before the oven could get turned up to 350, the parties reached a settlement. We are glad they are not fighting any more, but the settlement sadly leaves so many questions unanswered:

First, when did Sanders really start using the BUTTERBALL mark? Was it 1925, the date on its pre-litigation website; or in the 1930's as alleged in the counterclaims; or in 1960 as represented to the USPTO?  Lest you think this inconsistency indicates that Sanders just made the whole thing up, it can at least prove the 1960 date, because attached to the counterclaims were old mimeographed letters between Joseph Sanders and the company that was making his "Butterball Ham" labels. I guess one benefit of being a fourth-generation family business is that, when it's time to gather evidence, you just need to get a flashlight and go down to the basement!

Second, where did the "Butterball" name originally come from? My money is on the Bufflehead duck, sometimes nicknamed "Butter-ball" by hunters, which presumably reflects either the bulked up shape of its head in winter or what it looks like after a half an hour in the oven. In making this guess, I realize that I am picking an ornithological fight with The Atlantic, which a few years ago concluded (in a non-committal fashion) that the term "Butterball" derived from the Ruddy duck, also nicknamed "Butter-ball." In my opinion, the Bufflehead is the better candidate because (if I'm reading my Audubon maps right), only the Bufflehead would have been hanging out in Ohio in 1938 or in Michigan in 1925, when either Ada Walker and/or Joseph Sanders started applying the name to non-duck meat products. To find a Ruddy duck, you have to go further west. And yes, all of that is a pedantic way of saying we just don't know.

Finally, as the paragraph above hints, we also don't really know who was the senior user as between Butterball, LLC's predecessors and Sanders. The final settlement might tell us who the parties thought used the name first, but alas the terms are confidential. One thing is certain: after the settlement, Sanders took the word "Butterball" completely off its website.  Was that because Butterball, LLC (relying on Ada Walker's priority date of 1938) had the better claim, or because Sanders traded his 1925 priority date for a big fat check? We don't know, but if you are curious and happen to find yourself in Custer, Michigan this Thanksgiving, ask around whether Derek Sanders has recently bought a new car.

The author acknowledges that every time he says "we don't know," what he's really saying is "the internet won't tell us." If you know the answer to any of these mysteries, please fill us in. And hey GOOGLE, you can have Thanksgiving off but after that get back to work!

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
22 Aug 2018, Webinar, Boston, United States

After years of debate, the Massachusetts Legislature recently passed a comprehensive noncompete reform law, and Governor Baker signed the bill on August 10, 2018.

12 Oct 2018, Other, Boston, United States

The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable has been meeting bimonthly since 1995 to discuss current topics related to important changes in the electric power industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions