United States: The Continuing Value Of The Joint Session In Mediation

Last Updated: November 14 2017
Article by Leslie Berkoff

Traditionally, the joint session has been the foundation of the mediation process. In biblical times, sparring community members often resolved conflicts by gathering together in an open forum alongside other community members to discuss and resolve disputes in a collaborative fashion. In more modern times, the joint session has built upon this foundation to serve additional purposes, such as allowing the mediator to set the tone for and explain the mediation process to participants. In addition, the joint session provides an opportunity for the mediator to lay out the protocols for the mediation session, such as confidentiality regarding the information being exchanged and how the caucuses will work. Most importantly, the joint session allows the parties a chance to communicate directly with one another.

In that regard, it is important to remember that the origins of mediation are rooted in joint sessions rather than separate caucuses. Further, mediation was not dependent on party representation through counsel. Over time, perhaps starting in the 1990s, the mediation process morphed and the line between mediation and litigation blurred. Mediation participants began introducing litigation-based issues and demands into the mediation process at the expense of focusing on a more traditional exchange of thoughts, concerns, proposals and needs. That trend tracked with the increased number of parties retaining counsel to represent them in mediations — lawyers who were almost always litigators.

As a result, the dynamic of the joint session has been threatened. Some counsel view the opportunity as a quasi-litigation forum to posture and argue — even pounding the table to demonstrate the righteousness of client positions while the clients remain mute and entrenched in their positions. When a session is used in such a way, the mediator (who has no authority to make rulings on arguments) risks morphing into a referee in an effort to maintain some control over the process. When viewed as an opportunity for advocacy, mediation loses its essential client-driven nature with the potential for parties to speak and contribute to a creative and collaborative end result. In such settings, mediation is nothing more than a precursor to litigation or a stop along the path to the courthouse.

In recent years, some advocates have requested — and some mediators have decided — to dispense with the use of the joint session universally across the board. For some, the fear grew that allowing lawyers to use the joint session as a courtroom podium simply did not advance the mediation process and caused more harm than good.

Others who are more cynical believe that there is a more calculated purpose to seeking to dispense with the joint session: a belief that the desire comes from the individual parties thinking they can slant the facts and the mediator's focus more easily if they are in separate caucus rather than having the other side hear their view of the world and refute it directly.

Some experienced mediators believe that a more troubling basis might exist for the threat to the joint session. Specifically, in order for a joint session to be truly effective and impactful, the lawyers must prepare themselves and their clients. In order for that to be fruitful, time and effort must be expended. Lawyers and clients might not want to commit time and resources to preparing for the mediation, and this lack of preparation may result from a lack of faith in the ability of the process to work. Mediation can and does work for parties when the right mediator has the full participation and commitment of the parties. Cynics suggest one other possible reason for the threat to the joint session: the self-interest of lawyers who might be incentivized to keep the hourly clock running, although one would hate to think that this is true.

Now, in fairness, there can be some solid reasons and justifications for lawyers or even mediators to want to dispense with the joint session in a particular matter or be concerned about its use in a specific case. Emotions might be running too hot to bring the parties together due to prior history, and this might derail the entire process. A lawyer might have a client who is difficult to "manage," and the client might say or share things that could adversely impact the mediation process or undermine the client's case in open caucus. We have all had clients who have a tendency to just say too much against advice. (This is why, as an advocate, I wear high heels so I can stop on an insole.) All fun aside, in this mediator's view the joint session is an opportunity to showcase to the other side why settlement is in everyone's interest and how everyone gains in the process (this is very different than grandstanding and trying to prove you have the winning hand or that your position is better than the other party's position). Mediation should be a settlement-focused, persuasive and cordial process. Let's emphasize this again: Courtesy and civility to the other side (and obviously the mediator) is paramount; harsh or condescending comments will get you nowhere.

Despite the threats to the joint session, the usage of the session, if the foundation and framework are properly laid out, can be an extremely effective tool in the mediator's toolkit. Of course, the joint session should be modified to meet the needs of each specific case and, if appropriate, as previously indicated, dispensed with only if the cases so warrant. The basic premise behind the joint session is that the clients have the chance to speak; in fact, this might be the only opportunity for a client to speak outside of a courtroom or deposition — both of which include much more limited and controlled statements. This is a time for the clients to have a proverbial seat at the table. When clients have the opportunity to have a voice and advocate their own positions, without the filter of an attorney, additional facts, opinions and important issues come to light and can impact the process in a positive way. Also, allowing your client to hear the other side directly can be very illuminating for them, which allows both sides to see the issues through the other's eyes.

Both clients and attorneys determine their strategies in response to the positions taken by the other side. In mediation, that decision can be impacted by the manner in which the message is conveyed. Thus, both the lawyers and clients can assess the sincerity of the other side's story or belief and commitment in their side of the case and position, as well as understand why they feel justified or aggrieved. You can also evaluate your own client's ability to project as a credible witness in an open forum and project toward a courtroom setting; this cuts both ways, for both the other side's client and your own. During this time, the legal arguments take on a life of their own and can lead to a more personalized and successful process.

It is important for the mediator to diligently control this process. Prior to the mediation, both in writing and in separate calls, I emphasize the importance of the nature of the presentations to be made at the joint session; they are to be settlement-focused, and the client should be allowed to actively participate and speak. This is a collaborative process, and the parties can (and should) identify the key areas of concern, voice their grievances and try to focus the discussion in a manner that enables the other side to "understand where they are coming from." This is where clients should focus on needs, not wants. It is common that through this face-to-face dialogue, each side learns something new about the other's position, which up until this point has not filtered through their counsel and legal papers. The joint session is also a chance to present each side's version of the case or issues to the other side. While the joint session is not a time for argument, it is a time for a party to express the basis for its position in a manner that provides the other side the opportunity to understand the basis for that position.

In order to set the tone for the joint session, I speak with counsel jointly and at times separately, and sometimes with their clients, prior to the mediation. I also emphasize to each of them that the written statements that will be shared among the parties should be settlement-focused, persuasive statements — not litigation-based treatises. I also discuss who will be present at the mediation, or perhaps who should be present. For example, at times, the existence of an intractable personal conflict between two specific individuals might preclude resolution of a conflict, while involvement of others with authority might accomplish resolution in a more peaceful manner. I encourage the parties to give careful thought to what information to bring, collect and have available, such as demonstratives in appropriate cases.

Moreover, at times other than when there is a bankruptcy trustee in place or a litigation committee, the parties might have existing longstanding relationships with one another. As such, they may have things that not only need to be said, but thoughts on constructing a resolution that might facilitate an ongoing relationship. At times, parties have been creative in resolving their differences by speaking to one another and compromising on current or future business terms or dealings in order to resolve the dispute at hand. This is accomplished much more easily without the lawyers trying to negotiate basic deal points or shuttle back and forth with a number exchange. This gets to the heart of the original purpose of mediation and the joint session, allowing the parties to speak and trade items, or dollars, in order to resolve the dispute.

Moreover, the joint session is also not just for the parties to assess each other. Rather, the session also allows the mediator to assess the dynamics among the parties and get a read on how they interact with each other and where they (versus their lawyers) are entrenched in a position, or those things that matter most to them individually. This can be very helpful in determining how to manage the process during separate caucus, as well as picking a path to develop the negotiation process and further resolution. The joint session also allows the mediator to see how the lawyers are interacting with one another and perhaps determine that there might be other factors at play in the inability to resolve the matter, such as significant personality differences that need to be managed or implicit bias concerns wherein each side might be underestimating, undermining or undervaluing the options and statements of the other to the potential detriment of the client's concerns.

All of these factors are not readily apparent outside a joint session and interplay among the parties. Separate caucus only shows a window into one specific side of the negotiation process. While the mediator can utilize the joint session to even the playing field a bit and mitigate some of these concerns, huge issues in this area (which can be flagged in early calls) might lead to a real consideration to dispense with the joint session; therefore, keep this in mind when you hold an advance lawyers-only call and how the attorneys interact with one another. The mediator's job is not to serve as counsel to the parties, so incompetent lawyering cannot be fixed by the mediator, such as by suggesting defenses to one side or claims to the other (that would be a remarkable breach of ethics by a mediator). However, the mediator can manage evidence of implicit bias that might be adversely impacting the process and manage the parties so that hot personalities do not get in the way of the process.

Despite all of the foregoing, there are indeed times when a joint session should be skipped (e.g., when the exchange of vitriol or threatening messages will lead to a breakdown in communications and the overall settlement process). However, it is still a valuable tool that should not be automatically pushed aside. So, from this mediator's perspective, the session should be utilized judiciously when it serves a purpose, and not by rote. Lawyers: When a joint session is utilized, please encourage and prepare your clients to speak! Mediation is a client-driven process that allows the chance for clients to create a solution that meets both of their needs more effectively than what might be achieved in court. Allowing this forum for open dialogue and an assessment of each side's position is invaluable to resolution. Always keep in mind something I emphasize and have now named the "four C's of effective mediation": civility, cooperation, creativity and collaboration. The joint session can be an excellent place to ensure that these four concepts are embedded in the mediation process.

Originally published by ABI Journal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Leslie Berkoff
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Foley & Lardner
Moritt, Hock & Hamroff LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Foley & Lardner
Moritt, Hock & Hamroff LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions