ARTICLE
8 November 2017

Olagues V. Icahn, Et Al.: A Limited But Important Ruling On Disgorging Short-Swing Profits

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a limited, but potentially significant, ruling on disgorging short-swing profits.
United States Criminal Law

The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has issued a limited, but potentially significant, ruling on disgorging short-swing profits. In Olagues v. Icahn, et al., the court affirmed the dismissal of a "short-swing" trading suit brought by a shareholder in Herbalife, Ltd., Hologic Inc. and Nuance Communications, Inc., against investment entities controlled by Carl C. Icahn ("Icahn" and the "Icahn Entities"). The plaintiffs had sought disgorgement of certain consideration that the Icahn Entities allegedly received in violation of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act and regulations promulgated thereunder.

Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act aims to prevent corporate insiders, who are presumed to possess material information about the corporation, from earning short-swing profits by buying and selling securities within a six-month period. Exchange Act Rule 16b-6(d) applies where an insider receives a premium for writing (that is, selling) an option that is cancelled or expires unexercised within six months.

Here, the plaintiffs first acknowledged that the Icahn Entities disgorged premiums on certain put options that were cancelled unexercised within six months of their sale, as required by Section 16(b). They next alleged that the Icahn Entities should have also disgorged the "value" of alleged discounts that Icahn received on purchases of related call options. In affirming the district court's decision, the Second Circuit rejected this new argument and ruled that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible claim for additional disgorgement.

The court focused on the plaintiff's exclusive reliance on comparisons to options traded on the open market. The panel found that these open-market options had "no meaningful similarities to the options at issue here" and therefore concluded that the plaintiff failed to allege that the Icahn Entities disgorged less than the total amount of premiums they actually received. In issuing this ruling, the court emphasized the "limited nature" of its holding, because its conclusion that the complaint did not state a claim for relief reflected the plaintiff's exclusive reliance upon open-market options that were not truly comparable to the options at issue in this case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More