United States: Practitioner Insights: Impact Of Settlements On CERCLA Actions

The Comprehensive Environmental Response Com- pensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) is a constantly evolving area of law and courts' interpretations of certain provisions can vary dramatically depending on the jurisdiction. Thus, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of how certain areas of CERLCA are interpreted across the country. One important example of such a variance is whether judicially approved settlements of environmental liabilities trigger the statute of limita- tions under CERCLA.

The Second and Third Circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals have reached starkly different conclusions on this issue. In the Third Circuit, the statute of limitations is triggered when a party settles its environmental cleanup liability, even if such a settlement does not ex- pressly resolve CERCLA liability. Conversely, the Sec- ond Circuit has ruled that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until CERCLA liability is settled. Now, the Ninth Circuit has weighed in, agreeing with the Third Circuit in holding that a settlement agreement en- tered into under an authority other than CERCLA may give rise to a CERCLA cause of action and thereby trig- ger the applicable statute of limitations. Plainly, practi- tioners must be cognizant of which way each Circuit views the issue or face statute of limitations challenges.

Background

When CERCLA originally was passed in 1980, it contained no provision allowing a party who has cleaned up a site to bring an action to recover its costs from another responsible party (i.e., a ''contribu- tion action''). In 1986, Congress sought to address that issue with the passage of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (''SARA''). SARA provides that a person who has resolved its liability to the United States or a State for some or all of a response action or for some or all of the costs of such action in a judicially approved settlement may bring a contribution action. SARA further set forth a statute of limitations for those actions. Under SARA, a contribution action must be filed no more than three years after a judicially ap- proved settlement. However, SARA does not address whether the settlement must resolve CERCLA liability in order to trigger the running of the statute of limita- tions. As a result, a clear circuit split has arisen between the Second Circuit and Third Circuit as to whether a ju- dicially approved settlement requires resolution of CERCLA liability.

The Split

 The Second Circuit has taken a restrictive view, finding that, absent a reference to CERCLA, a ju- dicially approved settlement does not trigger the statute of limitations on a CERCLA contribution action. In Con- solidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. UGI Utilities, Inc., the Second Circuit interpreted CERCLA to create a right to bring a contribution action only when liability for CERCLA claims, rather than some broader category of legal claims, is resolved. In Consolidated Edison, ConEd sued UGI Utilities to recover cleanup costs at several sites. ConEd alleged that UGI Utilities was liable under CERCLA, as well as New York State law. How- ever, the judicially approved settlement agreement at is- sue was a voluntary cleanup agreement between ConEd and the New York Department of Environmental Con- servation resolving only ConEd's state law liability. The Department agreed that if ConEd cleaned up the sites, the Department would release ConEd from all state law claims.

The Second Circuit found that the agreement made clear that the only liability resolved was liability for state law—not CERCLA claims. The Second Circuit held that there was no running of the statute of limita- tions because the settling party did not resolve its CER- CLA liability. Several years later, in W.R. Grace & Co.- Conn. V. Zotos International, Inc., the Second Circuit confirmed this ruling. The Second Circuit found that a settlement agreement, which made no reference to CERCLA, established that the State settled only its state law claims against Grace, leaving open the possibility that the State or the EPA could, at some future point, assert CERCLA or other claims. Thus, in the Second Circuit, a party cannot bring a contribution action and the corresponding statute of limitations does not begin to run unless the judicially approved settlement ex- pressly resolves CERCLA liability.

In Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., the Third Circuit rejected the Second Circuit's in- terpretation. On December 21, 2006, Trinity and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection entered into a consent order whereby Trinity agreed to fund and conduct response actions according to a schedule approved by the Department. The consent or- der was entered into pursuant to Pennsylvania law. Trinity tried to bring a CERCLA contribution action based on the consent order resolving its liability under the two Pennsylvania statutes. The court held that a right to bring a contribution action is not dependent on the resolution of CERCLA liability in particular. The court pointed to the plain language of CERCLA, finding that it ''requires only the existence of a settlement re- solving liability to the United States or a State 'for some or all of a response action.' ''

The Ninth Circuit is the newest United States Court of Appeals to weigh in on this issue. In Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Asarco appealed a decision by the United States District Court of Montana that Asarco waited too long to bring its CERCLA contribution action against Atlantic Richfield. The East Helena Site was added to National Priorities List in 1984. In 1998, a con- sent decree was entered with the EPA under the Re- sources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act that made no express reference to CERCLA. In the District Court, Asarco argued that its consent decree with EPA that made no reference to CERCLA could not trigger the statute of limitations for Asarco's contribution action.

The District Court followed the Third Circuit's ap- proach to the triggering of the statute of limitations. The court noted that the plain language of CERCLA provides a contribution cause of action to parties who have resolved their liability for ''some or all of a re- sponse action or some or all of the costs of such action in . . . [a] judicially approved settlement.'' According to the District Court, if Congress intended to narrow the scope to cover only settlements that expressly resolve CERCLA liability, it could have done so, as it did in other sections of CERCLA.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit found that a settlement agreement entered into under authority other than CERCLA could give rise to a CERCLA contribution ac- tion. The Court started by looking to the language of CERCLA that requires a responsible party to enter into a settlement agreement that is administratively or judi- cially approved, but the provision is silent on whether the agreement must settle CERCLA liability in particu- lar. Finding the plain text of the provision unilluminat- ing, the Court examined a related section of CERCLA. The Court found that the requirement of a CERCLA ac- tion in the related section and its absence in the section at issue in the case is ''strong evidence'' that Congress did not intend to require that the settlement of CERCLA claims in order to have the right to bring a contribution action.

The Ninth Circuit also examined the meaning of the phrase ''resolve its liability'' in CERCLA. Again, the Court's analysis started with the language of CERCLA. The Ninth Circuit found that ''resolved its liability'' means the settlement agreement must determine a par- ty's legal obligations with certainty and finality. The Ninth Circuit further determined that a settlement is reached even though the government may have the ability to enforce an agreement's terms. And, there is no need for the party to concede liability under the agree- ment in order to resolve liability.

The Ninth Circuit found that Asarco did not ''resolve its liability''. The agreement preserved all of the United States' enforcement options against Asarco. In short, because the agreement did not resolve any of Asarco's obligations, it did not resolve Asarco's liability. There- fore, Asarco could not have brought its contribution ac- tion, and the statute of limitations did not begin to run in 1998. A later 2009 agreement, on which Asarco bases its present contribution action, did resolve Asarco's li- ability. Because Asarco filed that action within the three-year limitations period, it was timely. Thus, the district court's decision was vacated and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.

Implications 

In the Second Circuit, a CERCLA contri- bution action arises only when the settlement expressly resolves CERCLA liability. Conversely, in the Third Cir- cuit and Ninth Circuit, a non-CERCLA settlement can give rise to a CERCLA contribution action and thereby trigger the three-year statute of limitations. With the Ninth Circuit joining the Third Circuit, perhaps the trend will continue in the direction of allowing non- CERCLA settlement agreements to form the basis for a CERCLA contribution action. From a practical stand- point, courts will likely follow the Third and Ninth Cir- cuits because that approach seems to be most consis- tent with the expansive remedial purpose of CERCLA.

CERCLA is designed to encourage private parties to assume the financial responsibility of cleanups by al- lowing them to seek their costs from other responsible parties. An interpretation that limits the right to bring a contribution action to only CERCLA settlements would deter private parties from settling and delay the cleanup of contaminated properties. To the extent this becomes the dominant approach, practitioners need to pay close attention to the non-CERCLA settlements their clients enter in order to evaluate whether a right to bring a contribution action is created and the corresponding three-year statute of limitations is triggered. Focusing on the obligations under the agreement and the protec- tions afforded to the settling party will be key.

Regardless of how the trend plays out, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of the distinction among the Circuit Courts in order to avoid having a contribu- tion claim found to be time-barred. Many federal circuit courts have yet to address the issue of when settlements trigger the statute of limitations under CERCLA. Until this issue reaches the Supreme Court, lawyers practicing in federal court need to pay careful attention to the liabilities being resolved under an agreement and the express language used in the agreement. Based on the divergence at the Circuit Court level, there can be very different timing on the triggering of the statute of limitations.

Counsel should bear in mind that a wide range of cleanup activities taken pursuant to state or federal laws may trigger a right to bring a contribution action. For example, the removal of certain types of fill from a wetland in connection with restoration activities could be subject to CERCLA's three-year statute of limitations if the activities were agreed to as part of a judicially approved settlement. Ultimately, to eliminate any doubt, a prudent practitioner could file their contribution action and let the court rule on whether the claim is ripe. The expense incurred in bringing a premature claim is far outweighed by what could be lost if the opportunity to file a contribution action is missed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions