United States: Practitioner Insights: Impact Of Settlements On CERCLA Actions

The Comprehensive Environmental Response Com- pensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) is a constantly evolving area of law and courts' interpretations of certain provisions can vary dramatically depending on the jurisdiction. Thus, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of how certain areas of CERLCA are interpreted across the country. One important example of such a variance is whether judicially approved settlements of environmental liabilities trigger the statute of limita- tions under CERCLA.

The Second and Third Circuits of the U.S. Court of Appeals have reached starkly different conclusions on this issue. In the Third Circuit, the statute of limitations is triggered when a party settles its environmental cleanup liability, even if such a settlement does not ex- pressly resolve CERCLA liability. Conversely, the Sec- ond Circuit has ruled that the statute of limitations does not begin to run until CERCLA liability is settled. Now, the Ninth Circuit has weighed in, agreeing with the Third Circuit in holding that a settlement agreement en- tered into under an authority other than CERCLA may give rise to a CERCLA cause of action and thereby trig- ger the applicable statute of limitations. Plainly, practi- tioners must be cognizant of which way each Circuit views the issue or face statute of limitations challenges.


When CERCLA originally was passed in 1980, it contained no provision allowing a party who has cleaned up a site to bring an action to recover its costs from another responsible party (i.e., a ''contribu- tion action''). In 1986, Congress sought to address that issue with the passage of the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (''SARA''). SARA provides that a person who has resolved its liability to the United States or a State for some or all of a response action or for some or all of the costs of such action in a judicially approved settlement may bring a contribution action. SARA further set forth a statute of limitations for those actions. Under SARA, a contribution action must be filed no more than three years after a judicially ap- proved settlement. However, SARA does not address whether the settlement must resolve CERCLA liability in order to trigger the running of the statute of limita- tions. As a result, a clear circuit split has arisen between the Second Circuit and Third Circuit as to whether a ju- dicially approved settlement requires resolution of CERCLA liability.

The Split

 The Second Circuit has taken a restrictive view, finding that, absent a reference to CERCLA, a ju- dicially approved settlement does not trigger the statute of limitations on a CERCLA contribution action. In Con- solidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. UGI Utilities, Inc., the Second Circuit interpreted CERCLA to create a right to bring a contribution action only when liability for CERCLA claims, rather than some broader category of legal claims, is resolved. In Consolidated Edison, ConEd sued UGI Utilities to recover cleanup costs at several sites. ConEd alleged that UGI Utilities was liable under CERCLA, as well as New York State law. How- ever, the judicially approved settlement agreement at is- sue was a voluntary cleanup agreement between ConEd and the New York Department of Environmental Con- servation resolving only ConEd's state law liability. The Department agreed that if ConEd cleaned up the sites, the Department would release ConEd from all state law claims.

The Second Circuit found that the agreement made clear that the only liability resolved was liability for state law—not CERCLA claims. The Second Circuit held that there was no running of the statute of limita- tions because the settling party did not resolve its CER- CLA liability. Several years later, in W.R. Grace & Co.- Conn. V. Zotos International, Inc., the Second Circuit confirmed this ruling. The Second Circuit found that a settlement agreement, which made no reference to CERCLA, established that the State settled only its state law claims against Grace, leaving open the possibility that the State or the EPA could, at some future point, assert CERCLA or other claims. Thus, in the Second Circuit, a party cannot bring a contribution action and the corresponding statute of limitations does not begin to run unless the judicially approved settlement ex- pressly resolves CERCLA liability.

In Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co., the Third Circuit rejected the Second Circuit's in- terpretation. On December 21, 2006, Trinity and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection entered into a consent order whereby Trinity agreed to fund and conduct response actions according to a schedule approved by the Department. The consent or- der was entered into pursuant to Pennsylvania law. Trinity tried to bring a CERCLA contribution action based on the consent order resolving its liability under the two Pennsylvania statutes. The court held that a right to bring a contribution action is not dependent on the resolution of CERCLA liability in particular. The court pointed to the plain language of CERCLA, finding that it ''requires only the existence of a settlement re- solving liability to the United States or a State 'for some or all of a response action.' ''

The Ninth Circuit is the newest United States Court of Appeals to weigh in on this issue. In Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., Asarco appealed a decision by the United States District Court of Montana that Asarco waited too long to bring its CERCLA contribution action against Atlantic Richfield. The East Helena Site was added to National Priorities List in 1984. In 1998, a con- sent decree was entered with the EPA under the Re- sources Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the Clean Water Act that made no express reference to CERCLA. In the District Court, Asarco argued that its consent decree with EPA that made no reference to CERCLA could not trigger the statute of limitations for Asarco's contribution action.

The District Court followed the Third Circuit's ap- proach to the triggering of the statute of limitations. The court noted that the plain language of CERCLA provides a contribution cause of action to parties who have resolved their liability for ''some or all of a re- sponse action or some or all of the costs of such action in . . . [a] judicially approved settlement.'' According to the District Court, if Congress intended to narrow the scope to cover only settlements that expressly resolve CERCLA liability, it could have done so, as it did in other sections of CERCLA.

On appeal, the Ninth Circuit found that a settlement agreement entered into under authority other than CERCLA could give rise to a CERCLA contribution ac- tion. The Court started by looking to the language of CERCLA that requires a responsible party to enter into a settlement agreement that is administratively or judi- cially approved, but the provision is silent on whether the agreement must settle CERCLA liability in particu- lar. Finding the plain text of the provision unilluminat- ing, the Court examined a related section of CERCLA. The Court found that the requirement of a CERCLA ac- tion in the related section and its absence in the section at issue in the case is ''strong evidence'' that Congress did not intend to require that the settlement of CERCLA claims in order to have the right to bring a contribution action.

The Ninth Circuit also examined the meaning of the phrase ''resolve its liability'' in CERCLA. Again, the Court's analysis started with the language of CERCLA. The Ninth Circuit found that ''resolved its liability'' means the settlement agreement must determine a par- ty's legal obligations with certainty and finality. The Ninth Circuit further determined that a settlement is reached even though the government may have the ability to enforce an agreement's terms. And, there is no need for the party to concede liability under the agree- ment in order to resolve liability.

The Ninth Circuit found that Asarco did not ''resolve its liability''. The agreement preserved all of the United States' enforcement options against Asarco. In short, because the agreement did not resolve any of Asarco's obligations, it did not resolve Asarco's liability. There- fore, Asarco could not have brought its contribution ac- tion, and the statute of limitations did not begin to run in 1998. A later 2009 agreement, on which Asarco bases its present contribution action, did resolve Asarco's li- ability. Because Asarco filed that action within the three-year limitations period, it was timely. Thus, the district court's decision was vacated and the matter was remanded for further proceedings.


In the Second Circuit, a CERCLA contri- bution action arises only when the settlement expressly resolves CERCLA liability. Conversely, in the Third Cir- cuit and Ninth Circuit, a non-CERCLA settlement can give rise to a CERCLA contribution action and thereby trigger the three-year statute of limitations. With the Ninth Circuit joining the Third Circuit, perhaps the trend will continue in the direction of allowing non- CERCLA settlement agreements to form the basis for a CERCLA contribution action. From a practical stand- point, courts will likely follow the Third and Ninth Cir- cuits because that approach seems to be most consis- tent with the expansive remedial purpose of CERCLA.

CERCLA is designed to encourage private parties to assume the financial responsibility of cleanups by al- lowing them to seek their costs from other responsible parties. An interpretation that limits the right to bring a contribution action to only CERCLA settlements would deter private parties from settling and delay the cleanup of contaminated properties. To the extent this becomes the dominant approach, practitioners need to pay close attention to the non-CERCLA settlements their clients enter in order to evaluate whether a right to bring a contribution action is created and the corresponding three-year statute of limitations is triggered. Focusing on the obligations under the agreement and the protec- tions afforded to the settling party will be key.

Regardless of how the trend plays out, it is imperative that practitioners are aware of the distinction among the Circuit Courts in order to avoid having a contribu- tion claim found to be time-barred. Many federal circuit courts have yet to address the issue of when settlements trigger the statute of limitations under CERCLA. Until this issue reaches the Supreme Court, lawyers practicing in federal court need to pay careful attention to the liabilities being resolved under an agreement and the express language used in the agreement. Based on the divergence at the Circuit Court level, there can be very different timing on the triggering of the statute of limitations.

Counsel should bear in mind that a wide range of cleanup activities taken pursuant to state or federal laws may trigger a right to bring a contribution action. For example, the removal of certain types of fill from a wetland in connection with restoration activities could be subject to CERCLA's three-year statute of limitations if the activities were agreed to as part of a judicially approved settlement. Ultimately, to eliminate any doubt, a prudent practitioner could file their contribution action and let the court rule on whether the claim is ripe. The expense incurred in bringing a premature claim is far outweighed by what could be lost if the opportunity to file a contribution action is missed.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.