ARTICLE
25 September 2017

Sleeping On The Job… Again? Second New York Appellate Court Finds Home Healthcare Employees Entitled To Pay For All 24 Hours On An Overnight Shift

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
On September 13, 2017, the Second Judicial Department (Dutchess, Kings, Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester) issued two decisions in line with Tokhtaman
United States Employment and HR

Seyfarth Synopsis:  The Supreme Court of the State of New York, Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department ("Second Department") joined the First Department in finding that home healthcare employees who work 24-hour shifts are entitled to pay for all hours present in a client's home, including sleeping and meal periods.  With this holding, the Second Department became the second appellate court in New York to reject the previously accepted interpretation of New York law, consistent with federal law, that allowed employers to pay home health care employees for 13 hours out of a 24-hour shift, so long as specified meal and sleep periods were provided. 

We previously wrote about the New York appeals court decision in Tokhtaman v. Human Care, LLC, in which the New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Judicial Department (Manhattan and the Bronx), held that a "non-residential" home healthcare employee must be paid for all hours present at a client's home, including meal periods and time spent sleeping.  The First Department opined that "non-residential" employees are those employees who, like the plaintiff in Tokhtaman, "maintain[] [thei]r own residence, and d[o] not live in the homes of [] client's."

On September 13, 2017, the Second Judicial Department (Dutchess, Kings, Nassau, Orange, Putnam, Richmond, Rockland, Suffolk, and Westchester) issued two decisions in line with Tokhtaman, holding that non-residential home healthcare employees must be paid for all 24 hours in a 24-hour shift, regardless of meal and sleep periods.  The Second Department did not provide any further clarity as to what constitutes a "residential" home healthcare employee. 

These decisions reflect a departure from the rationale set forth in a 2010 New York Department of Labor ("DOL") Opinion Letter, which interpreted the DOL Regulation 12 NYCRR § 142-2.1(b) to allow "live-in employees" -- whether or not they are residential employees -- to be paid for 13 hours for a 24-hour shift so long as the employee was afforded at least 8 hours for sleep (and actually received 5 hours of uninterrupted sleep), and 3 hours for meals. 

With both the First and Second Departments in agreement on the issue, however, employers in New York should be aware of these changing and increasingly onerous pay obligations for employees working 24-hour shifts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More