United States: A Copyright Fable: Debunking The "Seven-Second Rule"

Last Updated: September 6 2017
Article by David A. Kluft

If you are a television news producer or documentary filmmaker, you have almost certainly faced this issue: You are putting together a story about a past event, and you want to make the point that this past event was once the subject of media coverage.  The easiest way to do that is to show some of that media coverage, for example, by including a short clip from the evening news or by panning across a newspaper article headline. Are you allowed to do that? Are you infringing the copyright in that news clip or in that article?

When I was a video editor (and not yet a lawyer), I was regularly told by other non-lawyers that such use was permissible as long as it didn't violate the "seven-second rule." This apocryphal safe harbor provided that, if you show a copyrighted work for fewer than seven seconds, then you were protected either by the fair use doctrine or by the equally mythical doctrine of "nobody cares."  Why do intelligent professionals pass on such fables to each other? Perhaps it is because, when you are knee-deep in raw footage and working on a deadline, you crave certainty.

In fact, such certainty rarely exists in copyright law. There is no "seven-second rule;" there is no "nobody cares" doctrine; and advanced reliance on predictions about fair use (a notoriously uncertain inquiry) is risky at best. For those of you die-hard seven-second rule adherents who still need some convincing, take a look at the Southern District of New York's recent opinion in Hirsch v. CBS Broadcasting, Inc., which among other things demonstrates that the short length of an allegedly infringing use alone almost never gives rise to a successful copyright infringement defense.

The 48 Hours "Stalked" Episode

Back in 2010, Ivanka Trump was among the victims of alleged stalker Justin Massler. In April 2010, photojournalist Steven Hirsch snapped a photograph of Massler outside a Manhattan courthouse.  The New York Post licensed the photograph from Hirsch and included it in an article about Massler.

Seven years later, in early 2017, the CBS news program 48 Hours aired a multi-part series called Stalked , which included a segment focused on Massler.  To illustrate the point that Massler's stalking of Trump "was a huge story in 2010," the 48 Hours segment depicted a two-second rotating screenshot of the New York Post article, which included the headline and most of Hirsch's photograph.

Hirsch filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York, alleging that CBS infringed his copyright in the photograph. CBS moved to dismiss, arguing that its fleeting use of the photograph was de minimis and also protected by the fair use doctrine as a matter of law. The Court denied the motion, allowing Hirsch's case to proceed. Let's take a look at the two defenses asserted and why the length of the clip didn't really help either one.

The De Minimis Defense

The closest thing in actual copyright law to the "seven-second rule" fable is the de minimis defense, which derives from the legal maxim "de minimis non curat lex" (the law does not concern itself with trifles). In copyright law, the de minimis doctrine is not truly a separate defense but an extension of the elements of copyright infringement: to prove copyright infringement, you must prove copying, which can be done with a showing that the copyrighted work and the allegedly infringing work are "substantially similar."  Where copying has occurred but it is so trivial that the works cannot really be said to be substantially similar, the copying is considered to be de minimis and therefore non-actionable.

Substantial similarity includes both a qualitative and quantitative component. Because the Hirsch photograph was qualitatively unaltered by 48 Hours (i.e., the clip depicted an exact copy), CBS focused its argument on the quantitative component, which the Court held "generally concerns the amount of the copyrighted work that is copied," "the length of time the copied work is observable in the allegedly infringing work" as well as such factors as "focus, lighting, camera angles and prominence." CBS argued that the clip's mere two second length should carry the day on its de minimis defense, but the Court was "not aware of any authority that such a brief period alone defeats, as a matter of law, a finding of substantial similarity."

In other words, the length of the use is a factor, but one that is easily and often rendered unimportant by other contextual elements such as focus, lighting, camera angles and perhaps most importantly, prominence. For example, CBS cited a case ( Gottlieb Development LLC v. Paramount Pictures) in which the use of copyrighted piece of art for several seconds in the background of a movie scene was considered de minimis. Although the length of the use in that case was actually longer than the clip of Hirsch's photograph, far more important to the analysis was the fact that that the copyrighted art was "always in the background" and partially obscured.

What is the takeaway? When you are hoping to use the de minimis doctrine to justify depicting someone else's copyrighted work, the length of the depiction likely may matter far less than other contextual factors, particularly prominence. In Hirsch, the clip was short, but it included an exact copy of a substantial portion of the copyrighted work (i.e., a qualitative substantial similarity), and the Court found that this exact copy was featured in a prominent manner despite its short length (i.e., a quantitative substantial similarity).

The Fair Use Defense

The Court also rejected CBS's argument that its fair use defense was so obvious as to require dismissal. The fair use doctrine is a four-part balancing test set forth at 17 U.S.C. § 107. It bars copyright infringement liability where a copyrighted work is reproduced for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship or research. Whether the doctrine is applicable in an individual case depends in large part on four enumerated factors: (1) the purpose and character of the defendant's use; (2) the nature of the plaintiff's work; (3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and (4) the effect of the defendant's use on the plaintiff's potential market.

The first factor is usually the most important one. In analyzing the "purpose and character" of the use, many Courts first and foremost ask whether the use was "transformative," that is, whether it merely superseded the original or added something substantively new or different. CBS argued that its use of the photograph was "highly transformative" because, whereas the image was originally used by Hirsch to depict Massler as part of a contemporary news event, CBS used it years later to provide "historical context" (i.e., to report on the earlier reporting). But the Court focused on the fact that CBS made no substantive physical change to the photograph, and thus any transformative nature of the use was not "self-evident" based on visual inspection. Therefore, dismissal was not appropriate. The "newsworthiness" of the photograph "is not enough," according to the Court; there must be some showing after discovery that CBS's use of the photograph was transformative because it provided some "new [and presumably non-visual] insights and understandings."

Notably, when analyzing the fair use defense, the Court didn't give a fig about the short length of the clip. In fact, one could argue that a longer clip could have made for a stronger fair use defense. This will take some explaining. Say you want to comment on someone else's work, which we'll call "X." The fair use doctrine is premised on the idea that, in order to comment on X, you may need to copy some of X (or "conjure up" X) so you can show the object of your commentary, and this copying is considered "fair." For example, a parodic novel like The Wind Done Gone may fairly copy a whole lot of protected elements from the thing it is parodying (Gone with the Wind) or the parody will not work. But if your commentary is not really about X, but about Y, then you don't have a fair reason for copying X. For example, the Ninth Circuit has held that a book parodying the O.J. Simpson trial, as told by a Dr. Seuss character, is not a fair use of Dr. Seuss, because the parody was not about Dr. Seuss; rather, Dr. Seuss was just being used as a gimmicky vehicle to comment on something else. Put another way – you need Scarlett O'Hara to talk about Gone with the Wind, but don't need Dr. Seuss to talk about O.J.

What does this have to do with the "seven second rule"? Well, in the Hirsch case, CBS will seek to show that it was commenting on the media coverage of a newsworthy event, and that this commentary necessitated showing that media coverage, in this case the clip of New York Post article and Hirsch's photograph. Hirsch, on the other hand, will likely seek to show that CBS was in fact not using the photograph to talk about the photograph, but rather using it as a gimmicky shortcut to illustrate something else. One could argue that a longer clip, one which lingered on the article and/or made some substantive reference to its specific content, would have made a more convincing case that CBS was indeed fairly conjuring up a copy of the article in order to discuss that article or the media coverage of which it was a part.

Next Steps

All that being said, CBS hasn't lost the case yet. Following the denial of the motion to dismiss, the Court scheduled an approximately six-month discovery period, after which CBS will likely return to the Court on summary judgment to make the same arguments under a more movant-friendly standard. Nobody ought to be surprised if CBS prevails. But if it does, it will be because there is no genuine dispute that CBS was in fact engaged in protected First Amendment activity and fairly commenting on the media coverage of Justin Massler, not because it did so in fewer than seven seconds.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
22 Aug 2018, Webinar, Boston, United States

After years of debate, the Massachusetts Legislature recently passed a comprehensive noncompete reform law, and Governor Baker signed the bill on August 10, 2018.

12 Oct 2018, Other, Boston, United States

The New England Electricity Restructuring Roundtable has been meeting bimonthly since 1995 to discuss current topics related to important changes in the electric power industry in Massachusetts and throughout New England.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions