United States: Seventh Circuit Upholds First Criminal Conviction For Spoofing

Last Updated: August 21 2017
Article by Robert Zwirb

Most Read Contributor in United States, August 2018

A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit unanimously upheld the criminal conviction of a high-frequency trader, Michael Coscia, for engaging in spoofing and commodities fraud in the futures markets. The spoofing and fraud resulted in earnings of $1.4 million in 2011.

Mr. Coscia was the first person criminally charged under the anti spoofing provision of the Dodd-Frank Act. He was sentenced to a three-year prison term for his trading misconduct. In upholding the conviction of Mr. Coscia, the Court of Appeals rejected arguments that the anti-spoofing law was unconstitutionally vague and, therefore, did not give him adequate notice of what conduct was prohibited, and that both his spoofing and commodities fraud convictions were not supported by the evidence.

The appellate court held that the anti‐spoofing provision provided clear notice of the prohibited conduct. The Court found that Mr. Coscia committed fraud when he designed a trading program that used an algorithm to submit bids and offers that were cancelled before execution. The algorithm allowed him to "artificially skew [the] market[] and accordingly, make a profit." The Court dismissed the argument that Mr. Coscia's high order cancellation rate should not be considered a factor because HFT traders commonly cancel 98% of orders before execution stating that Mr. Coscia cannot complain of vagueness of law as applied to the conduct of others. The Court also distinguished between legal order cancellations, such as "stop-loss" and "fill-or-kill" orders, which are "designed to be executed upon the arrival of certain subsequent events," and the kind of orders that Mr. Coscia placed, which "are never intended to be filled at all."

In holding that Mr. Coscia's conviction was adequately supported by the evidence, the Court cited the large disparity between the high cancellation rate of his large orders and the low cancellation rate of his small orders, noting that while nearly 36% of Mr. Coscia's small orders were filled, only 0.08% of his large orders were. This discrepancy, according to the Court, suggested Mr. Coscia's orders were placed "not with the intent to actually consummate the transaction, but rather to shift the market toward the artificial price at which the small orders were ultimately traded." The Court further noted that the scheme allowed Mr. Coscia "to buy low and sell high in a market artificially distorted by his actions," and at "a price equilibrium that he created."

Commentary / Bob Zwirb

The Seventh Circuit does a very good job in clarifying the distinction between legal and illegal order cancellations. However, we still are left with an area of law that remains somewhat opaque (if not constitutionally vague). Notwithstanding the Court's view that "[t]he statute clearly defines the term spoofing," that definition, which is specified in a parenthetical, "(bidding or offering with the intent to cancel the bid or offer before execution)," is still problematic since it seems to encompass trading conduct that is well-accepted to be perfectly legal. (Note that the Court apparently concedes that 98% of orders are cancelled without execution, which would certainly suggest that there is little expectation that most orders will not be executed.) Further, if the statute were clear on its face, there presumably would be no need for the CFTC and the exchanges to issue serial interpretive guidance over the years in the form of policy statements, fact sheets, questions and answers, and Federal Register releases, and to hold roundtables to further flesh out what the written materials haven't. See, e.g., Antidisruptive Practices Authority, 78 Fed. Reg 31890 (May 28, 2013) (Interpretive guidance and policy statement); Federal Register: CFTC Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement; CFTC Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement on Disruptive Practices; CFTC Q&A – Interpretive Guidance and Policy Statement on Disruptive Practices; CFTC Staff Roundtable to Discuss Disruptive Trading Practices; New CME Rule on Disruptive Trading Practices Summary Chart.

Moreover, it doesn't help matters that the spoofing provision added by Dodd-Frank, as the Court observes, "has almost no legislative history." Court Op. at p. 5, n. 7 (noting that "[t]he only meaningful reference reads as follows: "The CFTC requested, and received, enforcement authority with respect to insider trading, restitution authority, and disruptive trading practices." 156 Cong. Rec. S5992 (daily ed. July 15, 2010) (statement of Sen. Lincoln) (emphasis added)).

One way to read the case is that the Court essentially defined "spoofing" as a form of what is traditionally understood to mean market manipulation. Thus, for example, the Court states that "it is clear that the purpose of spoofing is to artificially skew markets and accordingly make a profit"; that Mr. Coscia's large orders were placed, "not with the intent to actually consummate the transaction, but rather to shift the market toward the artificial price at which the small orders were ultimately traded"; that Mr. "Coscia made money by artificially inflating and deflating prices"; and that those who traded with Mr. Coscia "were always harmed by the artificial shift in market price." (emphasis added). Given all the ink that has been spilled over the years trying to describe what constitutes spoofing, and the angst that it has caused, if "spoofing" just means market manipulation, Congress would have done better not to add the spoofing language to the CEA, as it is both duplicative and confusing.

There is one point in the Court's decision that seems directly at variance with the approach followed by the CFTC. The calculation endorsed by the Court here for determining the losses attributable to Mr. Coscia's conduct – employment of "probable loss" for that of "loss" because "all losses could not be calculated reasonably," contrasts with the obligation of the CFTC in the civil context to establish such numbers with "reasonable precision." See In re R&W Technical Services, Inc. CFTC Docket No. 96-3 (Aug. 6, 2000) (interpreting Division's burden of proof under Section 6(c)'s treble monetary gain approach to determining maximum allowable civil money penalties as requiring it "to establish net profits with reasonable precision based on actual revenues and actual expenses").

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions