ARTICLE
17 August 2017

SEC Settles Insider Trading Charges With Former Analyst

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The SEC agreed to settle charges with a former hedge fund analyst accused of trading on nonpublic information (see previous coverage).
United States Criminal Law

The SEC agreed to settle charges with a former hedge fund analyst accused of trading on nonpublic information (see previous coverage).

In a Complaint filed in May 2017, the SEC alleged that Jordan Fogel traded on nonpublic information communicated to him by a "political intelligence consultant" about plans to cut Medicare reimbursement rates. Reportedly, the consultant received the confidential information from a former colleague employed at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Mr. Fogel agreed to cooperate with the SEC's litigation against the remaining defendants. The Court for the Southern District of New York will determine any potential interest, disgorgement or penalties.

Mr. Fogel now has resolved the SEC's civil claims and the DOJ's criminal charges against him. In May 2017, Mr. Fogel pleaded guilty to charges of insider trading, wire fraud and other crimes filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York.

Commentary / Joseph Facciponti

This case shows that those who use "political intelligence consultants" to obtain information for trading purposes expose themselves to similar risks as those who use "expert networks." Just as trading on material nonpublic corporate information can lead to potential civil and criminal charges, so can trading based on nonpublic information obtained from government sources.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More