United States: When It Comes To Domestic Industry's Economic Prong, Numbers Speak Louder Than Words

Last Updated: August 11 2017
Article by IP Landscape

Article by Jordan Coyle and Erica Rothenberg

Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and Recommended Determination on Remedy and Bond, Certain Radio Frequency Identification ("RFID") Products and Components Thereof, ITC Inv. No. 337-TA-979 (June 22, 2017) (ALJ MaryJoan McNamara)

In a recent Initial Determination, Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") MaryJoan McNamara ruled against Complainant Neology, Inc., finding no violation on multiple grounds.  This post focuses on ALJ McNamara's analysis of the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement.  Her decision is notable because of the number and diversity of economic prong theories Neology advanced, and the ALJ's focus on the presence or absence of quantitative evidence supporting those theories, further cementing the effect of the Federal Circuit's 2015 Lelo v. ITC decision.

Neology tried two patents: Nos. 8,325,044 ("the '044 patent") and 8,587,436 ("the '436 patent).  Both were directed to RFID technology, with the '044 patent focusing on RFID tags, and the '436 patent focusing on RFID readers.  Respondents did not contest that Neology satisfied the economic prong for the '044 patent.  Neology had manufactured millions of RFID tags at its 14,000-square-foot facility in California and invested significantly in employment there.

But when attention shifted to the '436 patent, the tide turned against Neology.  Neology advanced four distinct theories for how it met the economic prong for this patent.  ALJ McNamara rejected three of them and found the fourth "barely" satisfied the economic prong requirement.  (The fourth ground was mooted in light of her invalidity findings regarding the '436 patent.)

Neology argued that it met the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement through:

  1. Its own investments;
  2. Investments of its licensee;
  3. Investments of its subcontractor; and
  4. Investments of its distributor.

I.  Neology Lacked "Even Minimally Reliable Quantitative, Let Alone Qualitative Evidence" of Its Own Investments That Would Establish Domestic Industry 

Neology first relied on its own investments in developing a 6C-compatible prototype reader in 2006–2009.  But Neology outsourced that development to subcontractors in 2009—six years before the Complaint was filed and three years before the '436 patent even issued.

Neology emphasized that it maintained ongoing relationships with those subcontractors after 2009, but its expert and fact witnesses could offer only vague statements to this effect.  They insisted that these relationships were "extremely important," but could not quantify the time that Neology employees spent on subcontractor support, and could name only a few subcontractor employees—none with clear roles—who were dedicated to Neology's RFID readers.  Indeed, ALJ McNamara determined that Neology "completely ignored the holding in Lelo" and offered "no significant quantitative metric of Complainant's ongoing investments from 2009-2015."

Had Neology been able to quantify its continued qualifying investments through the date of the complaint, Neology might have been able to satisfy the economic prong in spite of its earlier departure from RFID production.  Indeed, the economic prong does not require any minimum monetary expenditure, so long as the complainant offers some quantification of its domestic industry.  Without "even minimally reliable quantitative, let alone, qualitative evidence" to support a finding of domestic industry, however, Neology's first argument failed.

II.  Evidence of Neology's Licensee's Investments Was "Simply Lacking in Quantitative Specifics" 

Neology next relied on the investments of its licensee.  This section of the ID was heavily redacted, but appeared to rely on a 2013 settlement that resulted in a licensing and supply agreement between Neology and another party, as well as Neology's acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment.  But evidentiary problems plagued this argument, as well.

Neology's witnesses were only generally familiar with the settlement in question; they could not quantify the value of the resulting agreement or items that the licensee manufactured up until the date of the Complaint.  They also could not quantify Neology's investments in conjunction with its use of the acquired equipment, the current value of the equipment, or even how much of that equipment was still in use after 2012.  Although the witnesses offered anecdotal information about relevant facilities and the employees who worked there, their accounts were "simply lacking in quantitative specifics."  Again citing Lelo, ALJ McNamara determined that Neology failed to establish domestic industry through its licensee's activities.

III.  Evidence of Neology's Subcontractor's Investments Lacked "Granular Detail"

  Neology's third argument relied on investments by its subcontractor with which it had two OEM agreements.  One of these agreements was still in force when Neology filed the Complaint, and was allegedly "tailored specifically" to Neology's requirements and those of its customers.  But the subcontractor had no licensing arrangements with Neology involving the asserted patents or relevant RFID protocols, and "Complainant offered little quantitative evidence with respect to [its] investments."  Neology provided no solid evidence of how much square footage of its subcontractor's facility was devoted to work for Neology.  Neology relied on equipment that the subcontractor used for R&D, but did not introduce evidence of the cost of that equipment, or provide any other "granular detail" for relevant R&D, equipment, labor or capital.  Without this "detail," Neology could not satisfy the economic prong through the subcontractor's activities.

IV.  Neology's Distributor's Investments "Barely" Satisfied the Economic Prong and Were Irrelevant in Light of Invalidity

  Lastly, Neology argued that the investments of its distributor satisfied the economic prong.  ALJ McNamara agreed these investments satisfied at least Section 337(a)(3)(B), albeit "barely."  The distributor had made significant investments in labor and capital related to the domestic industry products, and had used cost accounting methods within a "reasonable range" in connection with sales to Neology.  Unfortunately, because the patents at issue had both been found invalid, this had no practical effect on the ALJ's determination.

*          *          *

ALJ McNamara's decision is subject to review by the Commission and, therefore, is not final.  Still, her decision demonstrates the continuing impact of the Lelo decision on the domestic industry analysis.  Lelo and its progeny make clear that numbers speak louder than words.  In proving the existence of a domestic industry, complainants must demonstrate specific quantitative investments, such as facility space used for the domestic industry products, employees assigned to those products, hours worked on those products, and investments in equipment used for those products.  Qualitative evidence can set the stage for and augment quantitative evidence, but without the numbers, you won't get far in the ITC.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
17 Dec 2018, Seminar, New York, United States

Orrick partner Evan Hollander will be co-chairing the Practising Law Institute’s annual Nuts and Bolts of Corporate Bankruptcy seminar, which will be held December 17-18, 2018 at PLI New York Center.

19 Dec 2018, Webinar, New York, United States

Intellectual Property partner Rich Martinelli will join The Knowledge Group’s live webcast, “Artificial Intelligence: A Discussion of Intellectual Property Trends and Issues in 2019.”

16 Jan 2019, Other, New York, United States

Intellectual Property partner Paul Fakler will moderate the “The Future of Music Mechanical Licensing” panel at the Copyright and Technology 2019 Conference.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions