United States: FTC Sues Louisiana Appraisers For Price Fixing

Last Updated: June 21 2017
Article by Antitrust Watch

Authored by James J. Tierney and Emily Luken.

On May 31, 2017, the FTC filed an administrative complaint alleging that the Louisiana Real Estate Appraisers Board ("Board"), a state agency controlled by real estate appraisers, violated Section 5 of the FTC Act by fixing real estate appraisal fees paid by appraisal management companies ("AMCs"). AMCs act as agents for lenders in arranging real estate appraisals and are licensed and regulated by the Board.  The FTC alleges that the Board required AMCs to pay appraisal fees that are equal to or exceed the median fees identified in survey reports commissioned and published by the Board.  This action represents the FTC's first enforcement action against a state agency since its victory in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. FTC, 135 S.Ct. 1101 (2015).  An administrative trial is scheduled to begin on January 30, 2018.

FTC Allegations that the Board Suppressed Competition

The FTC complaint specifically identified two ways the Board restrained price competition for appraisal services in Louisiana, and suggested a third price-fixing mechanism. First, the FTC alleged that regulations adopted by the Board displaced market forces.  Under the regulations adopted by the Board, AMCs must compensate appraisers at a rate determined by one of three methods:  (1) a survey of fees paid by lenders; (2) a fee schedule established by the Board; or (3) fees recently paid by an AMC, adjusted for six factors related to the property and the appraiser's experience.  Because the regulations identified these three methods as the exclusive way to establish appraisal fees, it precluded AMCs from arriving at fees through the operation of market forces, for example negotiations between AMCs and individual appraisers.

Second, the FTC alleged that the Board's enforcement of its regulations unreasonably restrained price competition. The Board commissioned and published surveys on fees paid in 2012, 2013 and 2014 that identified the median fees paid by lenders for various types of appraisals.  The Board used its investigative and enforcement powers to effectively require AMCs to pay appraisal fees that equal or exceed the median fees identified in its surveys.  For example, the Board initiated enforcement actions against 2 AMCs that had negotiated fees below the median fees identified in the surveys commissioned by the Board.  Each of these enforcement actions were resolved with the AMCs paying a fine and administrative costs and agreeing that going forward they would pay the median fees identified in the Board's surveys.  The FTC alleges that these enforcement actions were closely monitored by other AMCs and that they decided to pay the surveys fees to avoid investigations and sanctions.  The FTC alleged that this conduct set a floor for fees that AMCs must pay appraisers.

The FTC complaint also suggests that the Board's conduct may lead to anticompetitive price increases. Although critical facts have been redacted from the public version of the FTC complaint, the FTC notes that the Board's surveys combined responses from lenders and appraisers and that the "appraisers were eager to participate in the survey."  It is not hard to imagine why the appraisers were eager to participate.  Appraisers have access to the reported survey results and could attempt to manipulate the results by reporting they have received fees that are higher than last year's median.  Over time, this conduct would have the effect of ratcheting-up the median fees.

The FTC's Action Is "Just Plain Wrong"

Responding to the FTC's action, the Board's Executive Director said the "FTC is just plain wrong . . . the FTC is seeking to punish a Louisiana state agency for following federal regulatory mandates. Specifically, Dodd-Frank regulations ..."  In enacting Dodd-Frank, Congress was concerned that inflated appraisals were a contributing factor to the 2007-08 financial crises.  To address this concern, Dodd-Frank included appraisal independence provisions to protect consumers from manipulated appraisals.  Dodd-Frank included provisions to prohibit contacts between lenders and appraisers, which led, in part, to the use of AMCs to arrange for appraisal services.  Dodd-Frank also required that appraisers be compensated at "customary and reasonable" rates.  Dodd-Frank further mandated that the Federal Reserve and other banking agencies establish minimum requirement for state appraisal agencies, such as the Board, to ensure compliance with Dodd-Frank appraisal independence standards.  In response, to Dodd-Frank, the Board adopted its regulations implementing Dodd-Frank's "customary and reasonable" requirement for appraisal fees.  The Board contends that it was the federal government that required the Board to adopt regulations to ensure AMCs pay "reasonable and customary fees" and that its adoption of a fee survey was a "good faith" effort to comply with federal law.

Any Trial Will Likely Focus on the Competitive Effects of the Board's Conduct

The FTC alleges that the Board is controlled by appraisers and that independent state officials do not supervise the Board's activities. Taking the FTC's complaint at face value, the Board is unlikely to meet the requirements for state action immunity articulated in the U.S. Supreme Court's 2015 North Carolina Dental decision.  There, the North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners, an entity created by a North Carolina statute, sent cease and desist letters to non-dentists who were performing teeth whitening services at a lower cost than licensed dentists.  This caused the non-dentists to stop offering teeth whitening services.  The Supreme Court, in a 5-3 decision authored by Justice Kennedy, held that the Board was not protected by the Parker state action immunity doctrine.  Specifically, because the Board as an active participant in the market that it regulates, under those circumstances immunity only applies when the state entity is subject to active supervision by the State.  The Board was not under the active supervision of the state when it interpreted its authorizing statute to include teeth whitening and enforced that interpretation by sending the cease and desist letters, so it was not entitled to immunity.

Without a state action immunity defense, the trial will focus on whether the appraisers' collective action through the Board had an anticompetitive effect on appraisal services in Louisiana and the Board's justification for imposing the fees established by its survey. It will be interesting to see why requiring higher fees that were negotiated by at least two AMCs was necessary to protect Louisiana consumers and the independence of appraisers.

Implications for State Regulatory Agencies

State regulatory boards should expect vigorous enforcement against rules and regulations that deny consumers the benefit of competition. In one of her first actions, FTC Acting Chairman Maureen Ohlhausen created an Economic Liberty Task Force to address regulations that "stifle competition and innovation by preventing newcomers from entering the market, harming consumers through higher prices and fewer choices." This case demonstrates the FTC will not hesitate to bring enforcement actions against state regulatory agencies that have been captured by those with a direct economic interest in the agency's actions.  State boards controlled by competitors in the industry they regulate should have adequate antitrust compliance programs in place to ensure their actions do not violate the antitrust laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

10 Oct 2018, Conference, Florida, United States
Julie Totten is Program Chair of this year’s conference, Lynne Hermle is speaking on women in the courtroom, boardroom, and c-suite, and Erin Connell is speaking on pay equity and pay transparency.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions