United States: European Central Bank (ECB) Publishes Final Guidance On Leveraged Lending Transactions


Following publication of its draft guidance on leveraged lending transactions on 23 November 2016 and conclusion of a public consultation process, the ECB has published the final form of its guidance on leveraged lending transactions (the "ECB Guidance") on 16 May 2017. From its entry into force on 16 November 2017, the ECB Guidance will apply to all 'significant' credit institutions supervised by the ECB and introduce general criteria to identify leveraged transactions. The ECB Guidance aims to reduce systemic risk in the financial system and strengthen the underwriting and syndication practices of lending banks by providing guidelines for the sound management and supervision of leveraged transactions.

The ECB Guidance is similar to the corresponding guidance (the "U.S. Guidance") on leveraged lending issued for the U.S. financial services industry by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Controller of the Cur-rency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the "U.S. Agencies") already in 2013. It is fair to assume that the effects of the ECB Guidance on the financial services industry in Europe may be broadly similar to the effects the U.S. Guidance had in the last few years in the U.S.


Significant credit institutions in the Eurozone

Under the Single Supervisory Mechanism (SSM), the ECB supervises credit institu-tions, financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies which are established in the Eurozone (i.e. EU member states which have adopted the euro as their currency) and are treated as 'significant'. 'Significance' is generally de-termined on any one of the following criteria: size (total value of assets exceeding €30 billion), economic importance (for the specific country of the Eurozone or the EU economy as a whole), relevant cross-border activities (total value of assets ex-ceeding €5 billion and the ratio of cross-border assets/liabilities in more than one other Eurozone member state to total assets/liabilities being above 20%) or bene-fiting from public financial assistance (funding from the European Stability Mecha-nism or the European Financial Stability Facility having been requested or re-ceived). As of 1 January 2017, 125 entities were under supervision of the ECB, ac-counting for more than 80% of the banking assets in the Eurozone.

As the United Kingdom does not participate in the SSM, English credit institutions are not subject to the supervision of the ECB. This has been an area of concern dur-ing the consultation process of the draft ECB Guidance as it was considered to re-sult in an unlevel playing field among European credit institutions active in the lev-eraged lending markets. In practice, however, this issue should at least to some ex-tent be mitigated by the fact that Eurozone branches of credit institutions located outside the Eurozone are subject to the supervision of the ECB. Such ECB supervi-sion is likely to result in the ECB Guidance also affecting the leveraged lending businesses of such credit institutions located outside the Eurozone. This e.g. brings European branches of U.S. financial institutions within the scope of the ECB Guid-ance in the same manner as U.S branches of European credit institutions are al-ready currently covered by the U.S. Guidance. As regards credit institutions domi-ciled in the United Kingdom, it remains to be seen how the United Kingdom's with-drawal from the European Union (Brexit) will impact such effect of the ECB Guid-ance on leveraged lending businesses of UK credit institutions.

Leveraged transactions

At the core of the ECB Guidance is the definition of "leveraged transaction". The ECB Guidance does not seek to regulate the lending business generally, but focuses on leveraged transactions. While, similar to the U.S. Guidance, each credit institu-tion is expected to develop its own suitable definition of leveraged transactions, the ECB Guidance, in sharp contrast to the U.S. Guidance which does not provide for a uniform rule for the definition of leveraged transactions, requires that any lending transaction that satisfies one of the following two criteria must be considered a "leveraged transaction":

  • all types of loan or credit exposure where the borrower's post-financing lever-age level exceeds a Total Debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.0 times; or
  • all types of loan or credit exposures where the borrower is owned by one or more financial sponsors.

Both limbs of the definition have been subject of extensive comments and criticism during the consultation process,1 but have been adopted in the final form of the ECB Guidance largely unchanged.

Ratio-based determination of "leveraged transactions": Total Debt to EBITDA

With respect to the ratio-based determination of leveraged transactions, Total Debt pursuant to the ECB Guidance refers to total committed debt (including drawn and undrawn debt) and any "additional debt that loan agreements may permit". The ECB Guidance explicitly only carves out undrawn liquidity facilities and liquidity risk monitoring tools from such calculation. It should be noted that for the determi-nation of Total Debt, available cash may not be netted against debt positions.

While such definition of Total Debt pursuant to the ECB Guidance is in line with the U.S. Guidance, it contrasts to the typical determination of total debt in lever-aged loan agreements for purposes of calculating the leverage ratio where available cash is netted against the outstanding debt.

Furthermore, it is unclear which debt items will have to be included in the Total Debt definition by virtue of the phrase "additional debt that loan agreements may permit". In light of the apparent intention of the ECB to align its guidance on lever-aged transaction to the corresponding U.S. Guidance, it would only be consistent to assume that additional debt permitted under the loan agreement, in particular, 'in-cremental facilities', but also financial debt permitted to be incurred outside the relevant loan agreement, should be included in the calculation of Total Debt.

Whether this also applies to non-financial debt items permitted under loan agree-ments, usually set out in the financial indebtedness undertaking, is doubtful. The intended alignment of the ECB Guidance with the U.S. Guidance speaks against the inclusion of such items. Furthermore, it would cause substantial practical difficul-ties to include permitted non-financial debt items in the definition of Total Debt: A number of such items usually permitted in the financial indebtedness undertaking are uncapped or subject to flexible baskets, e.g. grower baskets the size of which de-pends on varying reference figures (e.g. total assets). It is unclear how such posi-tions should be reflected in the calculation of Total Debt.

In light of such broad definition of Total Debt, the 4.0 times multiple appears to be rather low and prone to capture transactions the risk-profile of which is not compa-rable to the usual leveraged lending transactions.

Contrary to the draft guidance, the ECB Guidance now acknowledges adjustments to EBITDA to the extent such adjustments are duly justified and reviewed within the credit institution by a function independent of the front office. This is also in line with the implementation of the U.S. Guidance by the U.S. Agencies.

Ownership of the borrower by a financial sponsor

Under the second limb of the definition, any financing extended to a borrower owned (i.e. ownership or control of more than 50% of the borrower's equity) by one or more financial sponsors shall automatically qualify as a leveraged transaction, irrespective of the debt quantum and/or Total Debt to EBITDA ratio. Again, this has been criticised during the consultation process as the mere ownership by a fi-nancial sponsor does not by itself result in an increase of the credit risk for the re-spective lender. Still, this limb of the definition for leveraged transaction has re-mained unchanged since the draft form of the ECB Guidance.

Besides stipulating criteria for the assumption of a leveraged transaction, the ECB Guidance also explicitly exempts certain financings from the scope of the ECB Guidance. Such exempted transactions include loans extended to natural persons, other credit institutions, investment firms, public or financial sector entities or small or medium-sized enterprises, loans resulting in an overall exposure of the credit institution of less than €5 million, specialised lending and trade finance transactions and lending to investment-grade borrowers (i.e. borrowers with a rat-ing equivalent to BBB- (S&P)/BBB- (Fitch)/Baa3 (Moody's) or above). Not only ex-ternal credit ratings assigned by rating agencies, but also internal ratings assigned by the respective credit institution should suffice.

The following table provides an overview of the key similarities and differences be-tween the ECB Guidance and the U.S. Guidance.


The ECB Guidance

The U.S. Guidance

Nature and goal of guidance

Non-binding and not intended to stipulate non-pass thresholds re-garding the origination of transactions, but supervised entities re-quired to set up sound risk-management and monitoring struc-tures for leveraged transactions

Non-compliance with guid-ance

No provisions dealing with formal enforcement or disciplinary ac-tion that may be taken against credit institutions that are not in compliance with the respective guidelines

Type of transactions covered

Loan origination, syndication, material modification or refinancing

Definition of leveraged trans-actions

Criteria: Leverage ratio or fi-nancial sponsor ownership as independent and mandatory triggers for assuming a lever-aged transaction Total debt: Same as per the U.S. Guidance, but doubtful whether permitted non-finan-cial debt items should be in-cluded EBITDA: Adjustments are in-cluded

Criteria: No uniform rule when a loan should be considered a leveraged transaction; in partic-ular, leverage ratio2 considered an (important) indicator (amongst other factors) Total debt: Including permitted additional debt (in particular, in-cremental facilities) under the loan agreement and deter-mined without netting of cash EBITDA: Same

Underwriting standards, credit approval, general monitoring and transaction-management policies

Credit institutions shall set up comprehensive framework es-tablishing binding underwriting limits, quantum, types and ar-eas of financings that credit in-stitutions are permitted to par-ticipate in and related internal standards and monitoring func-tions, including by independent risk functions

Banks shall have "clear, written and measurable" underwriting standards

Aspects to be taken into ac-count in setting up such standards

Independent pricing verifica-tion; leverage test and amorti-sation test (cf. next row); spe-cial monitoring regime and standards for dealing with transactions not syndicated within 90 days ("hung transac-tions"); tracking of weak cove-nant features, e.g. absence of any (financial) covenant or presence of significant head-room in financial covenants

Leverage test and amortisation test (cf. next row); undertaking of independent enterprise valu-ation using capitalised cash flow and/or DCF models

In particular: Leverage test / Amortisation test

Leverage test: may be industry-specific; high leverage levels ex-ceeding 6.0 times (at deal inception) should remain exceptional and form part of the credit delegation and risk management esca-lation framework of the credit institution3

Amortisation test: Cash-flow projections should show the ability of the borrower, over a 5-7 year period, to fully amortise senior se-cured debt or to repay at least 50% of total debt

On-going monitoring

On-going internal review of outstanding leveraged transactions and updates to be sent to the senior management of the relevant credit institution. Update reports shall, inter alia, include key mar-ket trends, information on leveraged transactions across business units and (non-) compliance with internal limits, potential concen-tration of transactions in type, industry sector or location as well as exposure to weak covenant features.

The ECB Guidance will come into force six months after its publication, i.e. on 16 November 2017. Eighteen months after its publication, i.e. on 16 November 2018, the credit institutions subject to the supervision of the ECB shall draw up an internal audit report and submit such report to the supervisory bodies. The report shall provide details of the implementation of the governance requirements under the ECB Guidance. Until such date, it is to be expected that the ECB Guidance will also become part of the day-to-day supervisory dialogue between the ECB and the individual banks supervised by the ECB. Given the non-binding nature of the ECB Guidance, it is currently not yet clear what the consequences of a failure to comply will be.

The practical results of the ECB Guidance on the issuance and syndication of lever-aged loans by credit institutions which are under ECB's supervision remain to be seen. Looking at the effects the U.S. Guidance had on the U.S. leveraged loan mar-ket, market diligence shows rapid growth of leveraged lending in the U.S. in the years 2011 and 2012 with lending activity peaking around the first quarter of 2013 and a decline in leveraged lending since then, suggesting that the U.S. Guidance may have slowed the origination of leveraged lending transactions. At the same time, subordinated / hybrid financing instruments, e.g. preferred equity instru-ments, seem to have absorbed a significant part of the decline in senior leveraged lending and led to an additional layer within the capital structure.

In addition, and despite the non-binding nature of the U.S. Guidance, regular re-views undertaken by the U.S. Agencies have shown a constant decline of loan origi-nations from U.S. financial institutions that do not satisfy the requirements under the U.S. Guidance ("non-pass loans") and a continued progress toward full compli-ance with the underwriting and risk management expectations set forth in the U.S. Guidance. Presumably, the ECB will expect a similar development in the European leveraged lending market, in particular given that its ECB Guidance closely resem-bles the U.S. Guidance. Apart from avoiding regulatory arbitrage by credit institu-tions active in the leveraged loan markets in the EU and the U.S., this has presuma-bly been one of the key drivers for the ECB to publish the ECB Guidance.

At the same time, however, the aforementioned reviews noted a migration of lever-aged loan origination to non-bank entities as a potential response to the U.S. Guid-ance. The trend toward non-bank lending in the leveraged lending market may therefore also become stronger in Europe as a result of the new ECB Guidance.


1 23 out of the 24 submissions made in the consultation process raised this term and/or one or more of its elements as an issue. 

2 Total Debt to EBITDA ratio of 4.0 times (or above) or senior debt to EBITDA of 3.0 times (or above). 

3Whereas the draft form of the Guidance provided that leverage levels in excess of 6.0 times always had to be referred to the highest level of credit committee, the final form now permits referral to the compe-tent body within the usual credit delegation and risk management escalation framework of the credit institution. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.