Minnesota Legislature Gives Up on Bill to Preempt Cities' Safe and Sick Leave Ordinances

OD
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart

Contributor

Ogletree Deakins is a labor and employment law firm representing management in all types of employment-related legal matters. Ogletree Deakins has more than 850 attorneys located in 53 offices across the United States and in Europe, Canada, and Mexico. The firm represents a range of clients, from small businesses to Fortune 50 companies.
In the waning hours of the 2017 legislative session, Republicans who control both houses of the Minnesota Legislature reached an agreement with Democratic Governor Mark Dayton on a budget bill that removed from a provision that would have preempted Minnesota cities' safe and sick leave ordinances and other labor standards measures.
United States Employment and HR

In the waning hours of the 2017 legislative session, Republicans who control both houses of the Minnesota Legislature reached an agreement with Democratic Governor Mark Dayton on a budget bill  that removed from a provision that would have preempted Minnesota cities' safe and sick leave ordinances and other labor standards measures. Instead, the preemption bill will be presented separately to Governor Dayton, who has pledged to veto it. Since the legislature's regular session ended at midnight on Monday, May 22, 2017, and a one-day special session has been called starting today to complete the enactment of bills agreed to by both sides, it appears that the preemption bill is dead for this session.

This means that the Minneapolis and St. Paul ordinances slated to take effect on July 1, 2017, will become effective on that date. Employers should continue planning to implement the requirements of the ordinances. Employers should also keep in mind that both ordinances provide for a one-year moratorium on enforcement, during which time an employer may receive a letter from the city's enforcement agencies pointing out deficiencies and requesting that the employer bring its policies into compliance.

A legal challenge to the Minneapolis ordinance that resulted in a temporary restraining order limiting its application to employers physically located within the city will continue to advance in the courts, with the case likely being taken up by the Minnesota Court of Appeals this summer. Additional legal challenges to the ordinances could be mounted on other grounds, including federal labor law preemption, but no such cases have yet been brought. We will provide updates and guidance for employers as the work to draft or modify policies designed to comply with the ordinances continues.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More