United States: Inadequate Disclosures Preclude Monetary Damages Recovery In Trademark Infringement Suit

Last Updated: May 18 2017
Article by NorCal IP

Article by George L. Kanabe and Alex Fields

Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Sazerac Co., Inc., et al. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc., Case No. 3:15-cv-04618-WHO (Judge William H. Orrick)

As any practitioner who has sought to establish trademark infringement already knows, likelihood of confusion is difficult to prove at trial. Nonetheless, a recent Order in Sazerac Co., Inc., et al. v. Fetzer Vineyards, Inc. demonstrates that plaintiffs still retain certain inherent advantages at the summary judgment stage in proving that there exists a likelihood of confusion, given the high hurdle for defendants to convince a court that no genuine issues of fact exist and that summary judgment is warranted. But as this case also demonstrates, that does not mean that plaintiffs can "sleep at the wheel," so to speak, when disclosing infringement or damages theories during discovery.

At issue in Sazerac were several of Plaintiff Sazerac's registered designs and word marks related to its "Buffalo Trace" bourbon whiskey, first introduced in 1999. In 2011, Defendant Fetzer Vineyards's CEO—Giancarlo Bianchetti—sought to capitalize on a trend of swelling American pride and decided that the buffalo was the perfect icon to capture this trend. According to Fetzer, its CEO was unaware of the existence of either Sazerac or Buffalo Trace Bourbon when its own "1000 Stories Wine" and its accompanying buffalo logo were created. Still, Fetzer admitted that it targets the American bourbon consumer by prominently advertising its wine as "Bourbon Barrel Aged," and by marketing the wine throughout bourbon-focused magazines and events. Some of Fetzer's internal documents even specifically mentioned targeting Sazerac's consumers.

Notwithstanding these facts, Judge Orrick dismissed several (but not all) of the trademark and related trade dress claims raised by Sazerac against Fetzer because Sazerac offered no argument regarding whether certain marks were infringed. And while Sazerac's claims for its buffalo logos and Buffalo Trace word mark (and related trade dress claims) survived, it lost the opportunity to recover monetary damages due to deficient initial disclosures and its failure to disclose any damages calculation until after the close of fact discovery.

First, the Court addressed Sazerac's unregistered1 Buffalo Trace trade dress claims. The Court held that Sazerac's trade dress was product packaging2 because its predominant function was source identification. And while the trade dress was not inherently distinctive,3 the Court found that there was a genuine issue as to whether Buffalo Trace had developed secondary meaning, as Sazerac presented evidence of thousands of social media followers, significant sales, consumer surveys, and co-existence agreements between Sazerac and other alcoholic beverage companies using a buffalo image.

Second, the Court dove into the likelihood of confusion analysis, examining the marks on which Sazerac based its infringement arguments: its Buffalo logos, Buffalo Trace word mark, and Buffalo Trace trade dress. The Court noted that because of the intensely factual nature of trademark disputes, summary judgment is generally disfavored. And Judge Orrick found that there was at least a genuine issue of material fact as to whether each of the following eight so-called "Sleekcraft"4 factors weighed in favor of finding a likelihood of infringement.

  1. Similarity of the Marks and Dress: There were enough similarities between the marks and dress—including a sketched buffalo in neutral tones, images of a buffalo on the front of the label, a smaller buffalo on the neck of the bottle, and gold/white lettering—to create a genuine disputed issue of material fact.
  2. Proximity of the Goods: Even though the products at issue were different types of alcohol, Fetzer explicitly drew a connection between its 1000 Stories wine and bourbon drinkers.
  3. Strength of the Mark: The conceptual strength of Sazerac's marks was undisputed, and Sazerac created a genuine issue as to commercial strength through number of sales, years of continuous use, advertising expenditures, and social media following.
  4. Defendant's Intent in Selecting the Mark: Fetzer claimed that Bianchetti was inspired to use the buffalo by a National Geographic magazine article and that the higher-ups at Fetzer had no knowledge of Sazerac or the Buffalo Trace brand. But this story was undermined by Fetzer's internal documents, which evidenced a marketing strategy whereby Fetzer specifically targeted Sazerac accounts for sales of 1000 Stories wine.
  5. Evidence of Actual Confusion: While the Court agreed that Sazerac's expert survey suffered from some "technical inadequacies," this went to the weight of the survey, not its admissibility.
  6. Marketing Channels Used: The parties marketed in the same magazines and at the same events.
  7. Likelihood of Expansion into other Markets: Although bourbon and wine producers may not compete directly for the same consumers, the Court found that they occupy the same marketing and promotional space.
  8. Degree of Care Exercised by Purchasers of Defendant's Product: Even though Fetzer's consumers may be discerning, the use of the buffalo mark paired with an association to bourbon was deemed likely to mislead consumers to assume a marketing or sponsorship arrangement between the parties.

Third, even though there existed a disputed issue of material fact with respect to likelihood of confusion between Sazerac's and Fetzer's marks, the Court nonetheless dismissed Sazerac's claims for monetary damages5 due to its excessive delay in disclosing a different method to prove damages. In its initial disclosures, Sazerac represented that it would disclose an expert to prove damages, but ultimately failed to do so. And instead of amending its initial disclosures, Sazerac waited until after fact discovery closed to disclose a damages calculation based on third-party licensing agreements. The Court explained that while Sazerac produced some licensing agreements in discovery, Fetzer was not alerted that these agreements were material to damages, and, Fetzer reasonably assumed Sazerac would not be seeking damages for trademark infringement after it failed to disclose an expert. Thus, because Fetzer would be unfairly prejudiced were Sazerac allowed to alter its damages strategy this late in the game, the Court precluded Sazerac from recovering monetary damages.

There was one "silver lining" to the Court's rulings for Sazerac. Judge Orrick left open the door for Sazerac to recover attorney's fees, as Fetzer could still be found to have acted maliciously, fraudulently, deliberately, or willfully. Still, even with that potential for recovery, this case serves as a reminder that trademark infringement plaintiffs need to take care in adequately disclosing all potential avenues for recovery during discovery, lest they be foreclosed from pursuing all of their previously-available options.

Footnotes

1. Trade dress protects aspects of the total image of a product that cannot be registered.

2. There are two types of trade dress, product packaging and product design. Product packaging trade dress is protectable if it is inherently distinctive or has acquired secondary meaning, while product design trade dress is protectable only if it has acquired secondary meaning, as product design cannot be inherently distinctive.

3. Sazerac failed to present evidence that the ordinary consumer necessarily imagines the Buffalo Trace brand when presented with an American buffalo on an alcoholic beverage container.

4. AMF Inc. v. Sleekcraft Boats, 599 F.2d 341, 348-49 (9th Cir. 1979).

5. The Lanham Act provides multiple avenues for recovery, including defendant's profits, plaintiff's damages, treble damages, and attorney's fees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
22 Aug 2018, Webinar, New York, United States

On July 1, 2018, new regulations from California’s FEHC went into effect, clarifying protections from national origin discrimination.

5 Sep 2018, Seminar, New York, United States

This seminar will discuss a variety of topics concerning the responsibilities and conduct of gatekeepers and will provide practical advice dealing with the government’s increased policing of the activities of gatekeepers.

13 Sep 2018, Speaking Engagement, New York, United States

Employment partners Tim Long and Erin Connell will be participating in PLI’s Cutting-Edge Employment Law Issues 2018: The California Difference.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions