United States: The New Face Of White Collar Enforcement: President Trump Signs Executive Orders Directing DOJ To Make Trade, Customs Fraud Enforcement A ‘High Priority'

Last Updated: May 18 2017
Article by Andrew Boutros and John Schleppenbach

Elections have consequences. And, since the November election of President Donald J. Trump, pundits, practitioners, and legal observers alike have tried to predict what white collar enforcement priorities might take center stage under the new administration. On March 31, 2017, President Trump removed the guess work from that high-stakes question—at least partially—by issuing two Executive Orders emphasizing his commitment to prosecuting violations of the United States's trade and customs laws. Indeed, the Orders could not be more clear: unfair trade practices ''expose United States employers to unfair competition and deprive the Federal Government of lawful revenue'' and therefore federal prosecutors and other law enforcement partners must ''vigorously enforce[e] our Nation's trade laws.'' Doing so, according to the President, must be a ''high priority'' for the Department of Justice.

This new designation for trade and customs law violations is especially noteworthy because federal law gives prosecutors sweeping authority to prosecute:

  1. those who import merchandise contrary to law; And
  2. any person (or company) in the supply chain who handles the merchandise after its importation knowing it was imported into the U.S. contrary to law.

The latter prohibition means that a person or company that receives, conceals, buys, sells, or in any manner facilitates the transportation, concealment, or sale of imported merchandise knowing the merchandise to have been imported into the U.S. contrary to law commits a 20-year felony and is subject to fine, imprisonment, and Forfeiture.

Thus, unlike statutes such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) that only authorizes the government to prosecute one side of the criminal equation, namely, those who give bribes (supply) and not the foreign officials who receive them or create the market for them (demand), the trade and customs fraud criminal laws are not subject to the same limitations. To the contrary, the government can investigate and prosecute both the supply side (foreign manufacturers, shippers, importers, brokers, and agents) and the demand side (buyers, distributors, packers, wholesale manufacturers, retailers, and industrial end-users) of the trade/ customs fraud equation. Although some have predicted that the government might increase its civil and administrative enforcement of our nation's trade and customs laws, our prediction is of a different order of magnitude: We appear to be the first to predict the government's increased criminal enforcement of trade and customs law violations. With that, the business community is on notice: trade and customs enforcement may well prove to be the next big (criminal) shoe to drop.

Understanding and Preventing Customs and Trade Violations

Some background: The U.S. is the world's largest importer of goods, having imported $2.252 trillion worth of goods from around the globe in 2016, up by 40.6 percent since 2009. From a continental perspective, 45.7 percent of America's total imports by value in 2016 were purchased from Asian countries, with another 25.8 percent supplied by North American partners, and another 21.5 percent from Europe. With such a staggering volume of merchandise entering the U.S. from throughout the world, the opportunity for fraud and chicanery at the border—when merchandise is making entry into the U.S.—is breathtaking.

As such, fulfilling early-made and frequent campaign promises, President Trump's first March 31 Executive Order focuses on studying and better understanding the scope and magnitude of the country's trade problems. Among other actions, it directs the Secretary of Commerce and the U.S. Trade Representative to submit a report to the President on the foreign trading partners with which the U.S. has significant trade deficits. In particular, the report is to ''address the major causes of the trade deficit, including, as applicable, differential tariffs, non-tariff barriers, injurious dumping, injurious government subsidization, intellectual property theft, forced technology transfer, denial of worker rights and labor standards, and any other form of discrimination against the commerce of the United States or other factors contributing to the deficit.'' Additionally, the report must assess whether these trading partners are unfairly discriminating against U.S. commerce and if the trade relationship has weakened the production capacity and strength of the U.S.'s industrial base.

The President's second March 31 Executive Order announces a law enforcement policy initiative bearing the presidential stamp of approval: ''The Attorney General, in consultation with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall develop recommended prosecution practices and allocate appropriate resources to ensure that Federal prosecutors accord a high priority to prosecuting significant offenses related to violations of trade laws.'' (Emphases added.) Similarly, the Executive Order directs the Department of Justice's law enforcement partners, Homeland Security Investigations and Customs and Border Protection, to ''develop and implement a strategy and plan for combating violations of United States trade and customs laws for goods and for enabling interdiction and disposal, including through methods other than seizure, of inadmissible merchandise entering through any mode of transportation[.]'' And the Order directs the Secretary of the Treasury and the Secretary of Homeland Security ''[t]o ensure the timely and efficient enforcement of laws protecting Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) holders from the impor tation of counterfeit goods,'' specifically through greater information sharing with rights holders. In short, this second Order sets out a significantly more aggressive approach to enforcement of trade and customs laws violations.

Focus on Antidumping And Countervailing Duties

In announcing its new law enforcement priority, the second Executive Order singles out the assessment and collection of antidumping and countervailing duties as areas especially prone to fraud, abuse, and criminal conduct. Antidumping duties are owed when a foreign manufacturer sells goods in the U.S. at less than fair value, causing injury to the domestic industry for those goods. Countervailing duties occur when a foreign government provides assistance and subsidies, such as tax breaks, to manufacturers that export goods to the U.S., enabling the foreign manufacturers to sell the goods cheaper than U.S. manufacturers. The Order notes the past difficulties the U.S. has had in collecting these duties, especially where companies lack assets in the U.S. To improve the U.S. government's collection of antidumping and countervailing duties, the Executive Order directs the Secretary of Homeland Security and others to develop a system whereby certain importers would be required to post a bond as security for any potential duties before being allowed to import to the U.S. Specifically targeted are importers for whom there is no record of previous imports, those with a record of failing to fully pay duties, and those who have failed to pay in a timely fashion. In addition to the bond requirement, the Order envisions increased enforcement of these duties through ''interdiction and disposal, including through methods other than seizure, of inadmissible merchandise.''

Far-Reaching Consequences

From an enforcement standpoint, the implications of the President's Executive Orders are far-reaching and extend well beyond abuses in antidumping and countervailing duties. This is because federal trade and customs law criminalizes not just fraudulently or knowingly importing merchandise ''contrary to law,'' but also receiving, purchasing, selling, transporting, or concealing any such merchandise knowing the merchandise to have entered the country contrary to law. That means that federal prosecutors not only can prosecute those involved in abuses on the supply side of the criminal equation, but those in the supply chain who transact in the merchandise after its importation and thereby create the demand-side market for illegally-entered merchandise. That the government can prosecute the entire supply chain of imported goods gives prosecutors wide latitude to target companies and individuals in the U.S., who are free from extradition difficulties and more likely to have attachable assets. This includes a potentially wide range of companies large and small, public and private, as well as their executives and employees. Distributors, packers, wholesalers, retailers, industrial end-users, transporters, and others are all subject to criminal prosecution if they knowingly transact in imported merchandise that illegally entered the country.

Additionally, given that the relevant statute speaks in terms of ''contrary to law,'' the government's ability to investigate and prosecute individuals and companies is not just limited to violations involving tariffs and duties, but rather extends to a wide spectrum of prohibitions that make the entry of the merchandise into the U.S. improper. Much like with prosecutions under RICO (the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), but with even broader discretion, prosecutors have the ability to choose from any number of predicate offenses when specifying the underlying ''law'' that was violated. Thus, companies or individuals could find themselves prosecuted for purchasing imported merchandise they know have been tainted by, among other things:

  • intellectual property theft;
  • counterfeiting activities;
  • violations involving country-of-origin markings, product substitutions, and product labeling violations;
  • food fraud; and
  • forced, child, or abusive overseas labor practices.

No differently than our heavily-enforced export controls laws that seek to restrict the delivery of sensitive technologies and information to hostile regimes overseas (outbound restrictions), federal prosecutors can use longstanding (but until now, largely unknown) trade and customs laws to more vigorously restrict the importation of merchandise that does not reflect our values (inbound restrictions). And, not only can the tainted merchandise, itself, be restricted or forfeited, but all who transact in and handle it are subject to criminal prosecution, so long as they ''know'' that the imported merchandise entered the country ''contrary to law.''

And, as a general intent crime, the standard for ''knowledge'' of the predicate unlawful acts is not a high one. Actual knowledge is not required, so long as there are red flags that a company or individual can be said to have willfully ignored. As has frequently been the case with prosecutions under the FCPA and other criminal statutes, the government can prove ''willful blindness''—the legal equivalent to actual knowledge— from circumstantial evidence, such as general information about the market for the goods in question, prior public statements about similar enforcement actions involving the same products or companies, or even evidence that the price paid by the defendant for the goods was simply too good to be true. As the Seventh Circuit puts it in its pattern criminal jury instruction on knowledge, a jury ''may find that the defendant acted knowingly if [it] finds beyond a reasonable doubt that [the defendant] had a strong suspicion that [state fact as to which knowledge is in question, e.g., 'drugs were in the suitcase,' 'the financial statement was false,'] and that he deliberately avoided the truth.''


President Trump's March 31 Executive Orders make it abundantly clear that this administration intends to vigorously enforce—including perhaps criminally—the U.S.'s trade and customs laws. And, with all enforcement options on the table, it would not be surprising if federal prosecutors (and Main Justice prosecutors, in particular) borrow from some of their tremendous success in criminal enforcement areas such as the FCPA, to send a resounding message to overseas and domestic market actors who transact in improperly-entered merchandise. It is only a matter of time before we know for sure, but our continued ''on the record'' prediction is that customs and trade fraud violations are destined for ''high priority'' enforcement. If so, other high-profile criminal statutes and white collar enforcement areas will be soon welcoming a new member to the top of the marquee enforcement list.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions