United States: Conference Of State Bank Supervisors Files Lawsuit Against OCC To Stop Special Purpose FinTech Charter

On April 26, 2017, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors ("CSBS"), the trade association that represents state banking regulators, initiated a lawsuit against the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to prevent the OCC from moving forward with its proposal for granting special-purpose national bank charters to fintech companies.

The OCC Proposal.  On December 2, 2016, the OCC announced its intention to consider granting fintech firms special-purpose national bank charters.  Fintech companies receiving such a charter would be under the jurisdiction and regulatory scrutiny of the OCC, and would thus be treated similarly to banks from a regulatory perspective—from the initial charter application process to the ongoing supervisory and examination regime.  The OCC argued in its proposal that the special-purpose charter framework would "help ensure that these companies operate in a safe and sound manner so that they can effectively serve the needs of customers, businesses, and communities," "help promote consistency in the application of law and regulation across the country and ensure that consumers are treated fairly," and "encourage them to explore new ways to promote fair access and financial inclusion and innovate responsibly."

Although the regulatory standards the OCC would apply to fintech firms seeking such a charter would be rigorous, the potential benefits of a national bank charter seem significant enough to encourage many fintech companies to apply. Those benefits chiefly include being regulated by a single regulator and, because the National Bank Act ("NBA") preempts the application of most state laws to national banks, being able to conduct operations uniformly across state lines.

The Draft Licensing Manual Supplement.  Building on its proposal, the OCC, in March 2017, released a draft licensing manual supplement (the "Supplement")  explaining the licensing process, as well as the factors it would consider in determining whether to grant a special purpose charter to fintech companies.  In addition to describing how the chartering standards set forth in existing OCC regulations and policies would be applied to fintech companies, the Supplement also notes aspects of the chartering process that may be unique to fintech applications.  For example, the OCC reiterates that, pursuant to OCC regulation, fintech charter recipients must engage in activities that are "part of, or incidental to, the business of banking," or engage in at least one of three core banking activities:  taking deposits, paying checks, or lending money.  But the Supplement also recognizes that many fintech companies may engage in a variety of "new" activities that have not yet determined to be either a "core banking activity," or "part of, or incidental to, the business of banking."  Therefore, fintech applicants should be prepared to discuss the permissibility of the proposed activities with the OCC, and potentially provide a legal analysis supporting its view.

The Feedback.  The OCC's proposal generated support from a variety of interested parties.  The fintech industry generally viewed the OCC's fintech proposal positively, arguing that the current regulatory framework hinders innovation, and that a special-purpose fintech charter would lead to a reduction in regulatory complexity and allow for easier nationwide operation.  The Marketplace Lending Association ("MLA")—a trade association of fintech lending companies—supported the proposed charter framework, noting that the charter "would allow certain [marketplace lending platforms] to operate on a nationwide basis in a highly rigorous regulatory environment—leveling the playing field with traditional financial institutions, making room for competition and innovative financial products, and promoting safety and soundness."  The MLA also noted the potential benefits for fintech firms of having a single federal regulator, and argued that, under the current state-by-state model, fintech firms are "subject to a patchwork of state laws that can be challenging to navigate and have the unintended consequences of increasing cost, complexity, and limiting market reach. "

The proposal has also been met with fierce opposition from numerous groups, including state banking regulators, chief among them, the New York Department of Financial Services ("NYDFS").  NYDFS  argued in a letter to the OCC that the "imposition of an entirely new federal regulatory scheme on an already fully functional and deeply rooted state regulatory landscape will invite serious risk of regulatory confusion and uncertainty, stifle small business innovation, create institutions that are too big to fail, imperil crucially important state-based consumer protection laws and increase the risks presented by nonbank entities."  However, one could expect many fintech businesses to counter that, rather than "stifl[ing] small business innovation," regulatory certainty encourages innovation, and that following one set of rules—even if those rules are strict—is easier and cheaper from a compliance perspective than keeping up with different rules across 50 states.

The CSBS Lawsuit.  The lawsuit filed by the CSBS represents one of the most direct challenges to the proposed special-purpose charter system to date.  In a press release accompanying the lawsuit, CSBS President and CEO John Ryan stated that the OCC's action represents an "unprecedented, unlawful expansion of the chartering authority given to it by Congress," and "ignores Congress, seeks to preempt state consumer protection laws, harms markets and innovation, and puts taxpayers at risk of inevitable fintech failures."

The CSBS' complaint advances two central arguments: (1) that the NBA provides no authority to the OCC to issue national bank charters to fintech firms; and (2) that the OCC violated the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") by proceeding with its proposal (which the CSBS refers to in the complaint as the "Nonbank Charter Decision") without undertaking a formal rulemaking process.

OCC lacks authority.  According to Count I of the complaint, if the OCC implements the special-purpose nonbank charter for fintech companies, it will exceed the limitations set forth in the NBA.  The CSBS asserts that the NBA empowers the OCC only to charter entities that (1) carry on the "business of banking" (which the CSBS argues—based on legislative history, case law, and the language of other federal banking statutes—requires an entity to receive deposits), or (2) engage in activities to fulfill a special purpose expressly authorized by Congress (for example, credit card banks).  Because these fintech companies will not accept deposits and Congress has not specifically authorized the chartering of fintech firms, the CSBS argues that granting fintech charters would exceed the OCC's authority under the NBA.

In Count II, the CSBS argues that the OCC also exceeded its authority under the NBA in promulgating the 2003 regulation allowing the OCC to grant bank charters to entities that do not accept deposits.  In its proposal, the OCC cited this specific regulation, 12 C.F.R. § 5.20(e)(1),  as authority for issuing special-purpose fintech charters.  That regulation provides that a charter may be issued to a special purpose bank that limits its activities to fiduciary activities, paying checks, or lending money.  But, the CSBS argues, because the NBA limits the OCC to charter only entities that carry on the "business of banking" or pursue a special purpose expressly authorized by Congress, the OCC exceeded its statutory authority in promulgating the regulation.  Finally, as a result of exceeding its statutory authority, the CSBS alleges in Count V that the OCC's proposal violates the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which leaves to the states all powers not delegated to the federal government, including "the police powers necessary to regulate financial services and protect consumers and the public interest from unsound and abusive financial practices."

OCC violated APA.  The CSBS asserts, in Count III, that the OCC has implemented a new "rule" of general application without complying with the formal rulemaking process required under the APA, and, in  Count IV, that, in making a decision to issue special purpose fintech charters, the OCC acted in an arbitrary and capricious manner  and without engaging in "reasoned decision making," in violation of the APA.  Specifically, the CSBS argues that the OCC failed to (1) consider "the effect of its actions on the states' authority to regulate traditional areas of state concern," (2) consider "the many significant concerns arising from the Nonbank Charter Decision," (3) conduct an adequate cost-benefit analysis, and (4) offer "a reasoned explanation for its decision."

If you have any questions regarding the OCC's proposal to issue special-purpose fintech charters, its draft licensing manual supplement for fintech charter applicants, this specific lawsuit, or any other fintech or financial regulatory issues, please do not hesitate to contact Reed Smith's global financial regulatory team.

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions