United States: SEC Throws A Change-Up In Conflict Minerals Rule Compliance

The SEC's Division of Corporation Finance (CorpFin) recently issued a statement1 announcing that, in light of the uncertainty regarding how the SEC will resolve certain significant issues with the conflict minerals rule, CorpFin has determined that it "will not recommend enforcement action to the [SEC] if companies, including those that are subject to paragraph (c) of Item 1.01 of Form SD, only file disclosure under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of Item 1.01 of Form SD." CorpFin's no-action position (No-Action Position) will benefit those issuers whose circumstances otherwise require them to file conflict minerals reports in accordance with the requirements of Item 1.01(c) of the SEC's Form SD (Item 1.01(c)), but that rely on the No-Action Position to avoid filing conflict minerals reports containing disclosures subject to being read as implying that conflict minerals contained in products the issuers sell "have not been found to be 'DRC conflict free.'" Unfortunately, CorpFin's statement contains no specific guidance as to how issuers wanting to rely on the No-Action Position are expected to comply with the disclosure requirements of Items 1.01(a) and (b).

CorpFin's statement was prompted by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia's issuance of a final judgment in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. SEC, et al. (NAM)2 on April 3, 2017. The judgment set aside those provisions of the rule that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) had previously invalidated in NAM,3 and remanded the matter to the SEC for further action. The D.C. Circuit's holding invalidated provisions of Item 1.01(c) requiring an issuer to make disclosure as to any product it manufactured or contracted to have manufactured containing any conflict mineral necessary to the functionality or production (Necessary Conflict Mineral) of that product (Conflict Product) and that had "not been found to be 'DRC conflict free.'"4

On the day CorpFin issued its statement, the SEC's Acting Chairman, Michael S. Piwowar, issued a statement in which he noted that until certain issues with the rule are resolved by the SEC, "it is difficult to conceive of a circumstance that would counsel in favor of enforcing Item 1.01(c) of Form SD."5

CorpFin's and Acting Chairman Piwowar's statements raise questions regarding how issuers are to comply with the rule in advance of the May 31, 2017 deadline for the filing of reports on Form SD for the rule's reporting year ended December 31, 2016 (2016 reporting year).

Putting the CorpFin Statement in Context

To put the No-Action Position in context, it is helpful to revisit some pertinent requirements of Item 1.01(a) – (c) of Form SD, the rule's substantive provisions. Item 1.01(a) requires an issuer with any Conflict Product to conduct in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry (RCOI) to determine whether each Necessary Conflict Mineral contained in the issuer's Conflict Products originated in one of the Democratic Republic of the Congo and its adjoining countries (Covered Countries) or is from recycled or scrap sources.

Under Item 1.01(b) of Form SD (Item 1.01(b)), an issuer that, based on an RCOI, (1) concludes that the Necessary Conflict Minerals in its Conflict Products did not originate in a Covered Country or did come from recycled or scrap sources, (2) has no reason to believe that such Necessary Conflict Minerals originated in a Covered Country, or (3) reasonably believes such Necessary Conflict Minerals did come from recycled or scrap resources must disclose its determination in such regard and briefly describe its RCOI and its RCOI's results in a report on Form SD filed with the SEC.6

Under Item 1.01(c), an issuer with a Conflict Product containing a Necessary Conflict Mineral that the issuer knows, based on its RCOI, originated in a Covered Country and is not from recycled or scrap sources or has reason to believe may have originated in a Covered Country and may not be from recycled or scrap sources must exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of that Necessary Conflict Mineral in the manner required by Item 1.01(c). If, after the exercise of such due diligence, the issuer determines that all of its Necessary Conflict Minerals originated outside the Covered Countries or did come from recycled or scrap sources (Non-Conflict Minerals), the issuer must file a report on Form SD disclosing its determinations made based on its RCOI and due diligence and describing the RCOI and due diligence and their results. Such issuers need not file a conflict minerals report (CMR) as an exhibit to their Form SD.

Item 1.01(c) further requires an issuer that, after conducting an RCOI and exercising due diligence, cannot determine that all of the Necessary Conflict Minerals in its Conflict Products are Non-Conflict Minerals to file a report on Form SD with a CMR as an exhibit to that report. The CMR must disclose, among other information, the issuer's due diligence efforts, each of its Conflict Products that has not been found to be "DRC conflict free"7 (a disclosure requirement invalidated by the D.C. Circuit's holding in NAM) and the country of origin of the Necessary Conflict Minerals in such Conflict Product.

Effect of the CorpFin Statement on Compliance

Issuers not subject to the provisions of Item 1.01(c) of Form SD. Issuers that must comply with the rule, but, based only on RCOIs, make determinations regarding their Necessary Conflict Minerals that allow them to only make disclosure in a report on Form SD in accordance with Item 1.01(b)'s requirements are not subject to Item 1.01(c)'s disclosure, due diligence, or other requirements, and, thus, do not need or benefit from the No-Action Position's relief.

Issuers subject to the provisions of Item 1.01(c) of Form SD. The No-Action Position allows all of those issuers that must comply with any of Item 1.01(c)'s requirements (Item 1.01(c) issuers) to comply with the disclosure requirements of the rule by disclosing in a report on Form SD their determinations regarding the origin and source of their Necessary Conflict Minerals based on the RCOIs they perform and the nature and results of those RCOIs. It also allows those Item 1.01(c) issuers otherwise required by Item 1.01(c)'s express requirements to file a CMR as an exhibit to their Form SD to comply with the rule's disclosure requirements by filing with the SEC a report on Form SD containing the disclosure described above without including a CMR as an exhibit to their Form SD. The No-Action Position does not relieve any Item 1.01(c) issuer—at least expressly—from the diligence requirements of Item 1.01(c) or any other requirement not involving disclosure.8

At this late date in the compliance cycle for the 2016 reporting year, Item 1.01(c) issuers should have already exercised due diligence regarding the Necessary Conflict Minerals in their Conflict Products manufactured in the 2016 reporting year. Consequently, an Item 1.01(c) issuer deciding to rely on the No-Action Position must decide if it will disclose in its report on Form SD for the 2016 reporting year, the determinations it made regarding the origin or source of its Necessary Conflict Minerals based on its due diligence as well as based on its RCOI and the nature of its due diligence and the results of that due diligence as well as the nature and results of its RCOI.9

CorpFin's expectations in this regard are unclear. While the No-Action Position could be construed as excusing all Item 1.01(c) issuers from all reporting under Items 1.01(a) and (b),10 we think it more likely that CorpFin intends the No-Action Position to be available to Item 1.01(c) issuers that file a report on Form SD containing disclosures complying with the provisions of Items 1.01(a) and (b) as if such provisions were specifically made applicable to those issuers. Thus, we believe that, unless the SEC provides guidance to the contrary, it is prudent for Item 1.01(c) issuers relying on the No-Action Position to disclose in their reports on Form SD for the 2016 reporting year, the (1) determinations regarding the origin and source of their Necessary Conflict Minerals they make based on their RCOIs and due diligence and (2) describe briefly their RCOIs and due diligence process and the results of such RCOIs and due diligence.

Without additional SEC guidance on compliance with the rule, Item 1.01(c) issuers still face, at least with respect to their compliance efforts as to the rule's reporting year ending December 31, 2017, the question of whether the No-Action Position is intended to relieve them from all of Item 1.01(c)'s requirements, not just Item 1.01(c)'s disclosure requirements. Acting Chairman Piwowar's statement suggests that, at least in the near term, the SEC is unlikely to take any action against an issuer not exercising due diligence under Item 1.01(c)'s diligence requirement. Nevertheless, without further SEC guidance on the issue, the more conservative course of action for Item 1.01(c) issuers to take will be to continue to exercise due diligence in accordance with Item 1.01(c)'s requirements.

Practical Considerations

Carefully consider disclosures in light of No-Action Position. The No-Action Position is unlikely to afford Item 1.01(c) issuers with any significant reduction in the compliance burden under the rule as to the 2016 reporting year. However, an Item 1.01(c) issuer that would otherwise be required to file a CMR with its Form SD for the 2016 reporting year could reduce its exposure to liability for any material misstatement or omission from disclosure that would be have to be made in a CMR, but not in a report on Form SD complying only with Item 1.01(b), by relying on the No-Action Position and filing only such a report on Form SD with the SEC. More importantly, an Item 1.01(c) issuer choosing to rely on the No-Action Position to not file a CMR should be able to craft the disclosures in its report on Form SD in a manner that does not expressly state or imply in any way that any of its Conflict Products have "not been found to be 'DRC conflict free,'" which is the type of disclosure required by those portions of the rule that the D.C. Circuit has invalidated. At the same time, issuers relying on the No-Action Position should be careful not to include in a report on Form SD any disclosure characterizing any Conflict Product as being, or implying any Conflict Product is, "DRC conflict free." The SEC is likely to view a report on Form SD including such disclosure as being subject to an independent private sector audit as the rule requires be conducted as to CMRs containing such disclosure and as being inconsistent with the No-Action Position.

When determining whether to rely on the No-Action Position, Item 1.01(c) issuers should consider the potential reactions that any changes to their disclosure practices under the rule may evoke from shareholders, activists, customers and NGOs that have taken an interest in disclosures under the rule. Such reactions could include a shareholder lawsuit claiming—notwithstanding the No-Action Position—that the issuer omitted more disclosure than was determined to be unconstitutional by the D.C. Circuit.

Contact CorpFin staff with compliance questions. CorpFin's statement invited issuers with questions regarding the content of Form SD and any CMR to contact the CorpFin staff. In light of the questions regarding compliance with the rule raised by the D.C. Circuit's holding in NAM and CorpFin's recent statement, issuers may want to take the opportunity to obtain whatever clarity CorpFin may offer regarding compliance with the rule and the expectations of the CorpFin staff for that compliance in connection with the reports on Form SD that must be filed on or before May 31, 2017.

Stay tuned to further developments. Meanwhile, in view of the reconsideration of the rule that the SEC is expected to undertake if the U.S. Congress does not first repeal Section 13(p) of the Exchange Act, issuers that may be required to comply with the rule should continue to monitor developments related to the rule.


1. SEC Div. of Corp. Fin., Updated Statement on the Effect of the Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule (Apr. 7, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/corpfin-updated-statement-court-decision-conflict-minerals-rule. CorpFin's statement updates the April 29, 2014 statement of Keith F. Higgins, the then-current Director of CorpFin. See Keith F. Higgins, Director, SEC Div. of Corp. Fin., Statement on the Effect of the Recent Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule (Apr. 29, 2014), available at https://www.sec.gov/News/PublicStmt/Detail/PublicStmt/1370541681994. See our discussion of Corp Fin's 2014 statement here.

2. Case 1:13-cv-00635-KBJ (D. D.C Apr. 3, 2017).

3. 800 F.3d 518 (D.C. Cir. 2015). See our discussion of this holding here.

4. Id. at 530.

5. Acting Chairman Michael S. Piwowar, Statement of Acting Chairman Piwowar on the Court of Appeals Decision on the Conflict Minerals Rule (Apr. 7, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/public-statement/piwowar-statement-court-decision-conflict-minerals-rule. This statement follows his statement of January 31, 2017 in which he announced that he had directed SEC staff to consider whether existing guidance regarding compliance with the rule was still appropriate and if additional relief was needed. See Acting Chairman Michael S. Piwowar, Reconsideration of Conflict Minerals Rule Implementation (Jan. 31, 2017), available at https://www.sec.gov/news/statement/reconsideration-of-conflict-minerals-rule-implementation.html.

6. The information in an issuer's report on Form SD, including in any conflict minerals report filed as an exhibit to the Form SD, must also be posted on the issuer's publicly available website.

7. Conflict Products are "DRC conflict free" if they do not contain a Necessary Conflict Mineral that directly or indirectly finances or benefits certain armed groups in a Covered Country.

8. As noted above, Acting Chairman Piwowar's statement may suggest that he sees the legal viability of the diligence requirements of Item 1.01(c) to also be questionable in light of NAM.

9. Many, if not most, Item 1.01(c) issuers see their RCOIs and due diligence regarding the origin and source of their Necessary Conflict Minerals converging, if not being the same efforts or process. For such Item 1.01(c) issuers, this question may be largely one of how they will label the particular efforts they make to ascertain the origin or source of their Necessary Conflict Minerals.

10. By its terms, CorpFin's statement of the No-Action Position seems to allow all persons potentially subject to the conflict minerals rule—including entities subject to the requirements of Item 1.01(c)—to comply with the rule if they "only file disclosure under the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of Item 1.01 of Form SD." This particular statement creates some ambiguity as to CorpFin's intent for how Item 1.01(c) issuers will comply with the provisions of paragraphs (a) and (b) of Item 1.01 because paragraphs (a) and (b) by their terms only impose reporting obligations on issuers that determine that their Necessary Conflict Minerals all meet the requirements of Item 1.01(b) based solely on their conduct of an RCOI.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.