United States: "Common Sense Reality": Seventh Circuit Holds That Sexual Orientation Discrimination Violates Title VII

Executive Summary:  In a landmark decision overruling decades of precedent, the Seventh Circuit en banc declared that sexual orientation discrimination violates Title VII in Hively v. Ivy Tech Community College. This comes as the first decision of its kind. The Seventh Circuit's decision was followed by a Second Circuit panel decision days later in Zarda v. Altitude Express reaffirming its recent holding in Christiansen v. Omnicom that the long-held view that sexual orientation is not considered to be a protected class under Title VII remains good law. It is now unquestionable that the Circuits have split on the matter.

Background:  Since Title VII was passed in 1964, the Circuit Courts have all held that sexual orientation is not a protected class. With the 1989 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins that gender stereotyping is discrimination "because of sex," the courts have been left to distinguish between discrimination based on gender stereotypes and discrimination based on sexual orientation. Hively came to the Seventh Circuit on appeal from the trial court's decision on a motion to dismiss in which the lower court determined the claim was one of sexual orientation discrimination, and therefore, consistent with prior precedent, dismissed the lawsuit. On appeal, the Seventh Circuit panel was also bound by this precedent and (similar to the panel of the Eleventh Circuit in Evans v. Georgia Regional Hospital and the Second Circuit panel in Christiansen v. Omnicom), noted that an en banc decision was necessary to overturn prior precedent. Hively moved for reconsideration en banc.

The Decision:  In holding, for the first time, that sexual orientation is protected under Title VII, the majority, in an opinion authored by Chief Judge Diane Wood, determined that "actions taken on the basis of sexual orientation are a subset of actions taken on the basis of sex," and, therefore, violate Title VII's prohibition of discrimination "because of sex." Key to this determination was the opinion — articulated as early as 1971 in Sprogis v. United Air Lines, Inc.— that among the purposes of Title VII is to "strike[] at the entire spectrum of disparate treatment of men and women resulting from sex stereotypes."

Two lines of prior Supreme Court cases guided the Seventh Circuit. The first included those applying Title VII to situations other than classic disparate treatment claims – i.e., making a decision because an employee is of a specific biological gender. Of particular importance to the decision were the Supreme Court decisions in Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. (recognizing same-sex harassment as a violation of Title VII) and Hopkins (recognizing gender stereotyping as a violation of Title VII).  In particular, the majority was guided by the Oncale Court's observation that statutory protections often go beyond the "principal evil" that the legislature was concerned with at the time the law was enacted to cover "reasonably comparable evils." The court concluded that using both the comparative approach and associational approach, Title VII must include a prohibition against sexual orientation discrimination. Under the former, the Seventh Circuit reasoned that Hively had been discriminated against "because of" her sex in that she suffered an adverse employment action because she was married to a woman, while a man married to a woman would not have been treated the same. As to the latter, the court compared Hively's same-sex marriage to that of interracial marriage. In Loving v. Virginia, the U.S. Supreme Court held that a state-wide ban on interracial marriage violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. In the same way, the Hively majority held that discriminating against an employee involved in a same-sex marriage violates Title VII.

The second line of cases looked to more recent Supreme Court precedent outside of the employment context that has recognized that same-sex couples are entitled to broader civil rights protection. In particular the Hively court looked to Romer v. Evans (Colorado Constitutional provision that prohibited government protection of "homosexual, lesbians or bisexual persons" violated the Equal Protection Clause), Lawrence v. Texas (statute criminalizing sodomy violated the Substantive Due Process Clause), United States v. Windsor (Defense of Marriage Act defining marriage as that between a man and woman violated Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses) and Obergefell v. Hodges (legalizing same-sex marriage).

Although the Hively court recognized that there is precedent to maintain the current state of the law in which sexual orientation discrimination remains untouchable by Title VII as noted by the dissenting opinion, "[i]t would require considerable calisthenics to remove the word 'sex' from 'sexual orientation'" and that "[t]he effort to do so has led to confusing and contradictory results...." As such, the court concluded that it is "common sense reality that it is actually impossible to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation without discriminating on the basis of sex."

Update from Other Circuits: Despite the Hively decision, the law in other Circuits remains the same. In fact, just days after the Hively decision was released, in Zarda v. Altitude Express, the Second Circuit reaffirmed its opinion in Christiansen that sexual orientation discrimination does not violate Title VII. While the Zarda court recognized that the Hively court had ruled otherwise, it distinguished its position from Hively in that, as a panel of the Second Circuit, it had no authority to overturn prior precedent. There is no indication that the plaintiffs in either Christiansen or Zarda will seek rehearing en banc by the Second Circuit. However, a petition for rehearing en banc by the Eleventh Circuit has been sought in Evans. A decision on that petition has not yet been made.

What Does This All Mean? The decision in Hively has left the Circuits, for the first time, divided on the issue of Title VII's protections for sexual orientation. Additionally, employers in the Seventh Circuit must assume that this decision encompasses gender identity and transgender status as well. Thus, the LGBTQ community has significantly more federal protections in the Seventh Circuit – which includes Illinois, Wisconsin and Indiana – than in other U.S. jurisdictions. This will remain the case until other Circuit Courts, sitting en banc, follow Hively's groundbreaking decision and, perhaps, the U.S. Supreme Court provides the ultimate decision to guide the country as a whole.

Bottom Line:  Hively should have little practical effect on Illinois and Wisconsin employers, who are already ruled by state law prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination. Indiana employers, however, should be aware that to the extent their policies and practices do not protect LGBTQ employees from discrimination, their policies should be updated to reflect the new state of the law. Additionally, employers operating in multiple states should recognize that legal obligations regarding the need to address sexual orientation and/or gender identity in the workplace now, more than ever, may vary depending upon the state. As a best practice, it is highly recommended that all employers, regardless of the state(s) in which they operate, have a comprehensive anti-discrimination and anti-harassment EEO policy that specifically prohibits sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination and harassment, and a complaint procedure so that employees who do experience such discrimination/harassment have an avenue to make the employer aware of the problem. Additionally, every employer should develop an investigation and resolution procedure for such complaints.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions