ARTICLE
24 April 2017

Prosecutorial Discretion in the Age of Over-Criminalization

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
An attorney with WilmerHale examines what legal commentators have called the overcriminalization of the U.S. Code. The former federal prosecutor discusses the best tactic for defense lawyers to tackle the problem, including by focusing less on critiques of Congress, and more on lobbying federal prosecutors on charging decisions.
United States Criminal Law

Depending on whom you ask, the U.S. Code contains between 3,000 and 4,500 federal crimes. The sheer volume has prompted legal commentators to decry the steady expansion of federal criminal statutes over the last several decades as an ''overcriminalization'' of American society that threatens individual liberty and takes an unduly draconian approach to corporate misconduct. Typically, these commentaries blame Congress for the phenomenon. By focusing on Congress, however, legal observers spend too little time on the role of the executive branch and ignore the more immediate, practical question: How should prosecutors exercise their enormous discretion in an era when theories of criminal liability are so abundant?

Click here to continue reading

Originally published in Bloomberg BNA's White Collar Crime Report

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More