United States: Massachusetts DOR Announces Bright-Line Sales Tax Nexus Standard For Remote Internet Vendors

On April 3, 2017, the Massachusetts Department of Revenue issued a directive advising taxpayers that it has adopted an administrative bright-line rule that will require out-of-state Internet vendors to collect sales or use tax if they meet certain sales and transaction thresholds.1 Under the rule, which is effective July 1, 2017, an Internet vendor with a principal place of business located outside Massachusetts will be required to register, collect and remit sales or use tax on its Massachusetts sales if during the preceding year it had over $500,000 in Massachusetts sales and made sales for delivery into Massachusetts in at least 100 transactions.

Bright-Line Nexus Standard

Directive 17-1 provides guidance on how the Massachusetts general sales and use tax jurisdictional standard2 applies to Internet vendors, and how such application complies with the Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the U.S. Constitution. In the Directive, the Department explains that, in lieu of applying the state's sales and use tax collection requirements on a case-by-case basis, it has chosen to adopt, for clarity and administrative simplicity, an administrative bright-line rule.

Economic Presence

Under the administrative bright-line rule, an Internet vendor with a principal place of business located outside Massachusetts is required to register, collect and remit Massachusetts sales or use tax on its Massachusetts sales3 as follows:

  • For the six-month period, July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, if during the preceding 12 months, July 1, 2016 to June 30, 2017, it had in excess of $500,000
  • in Massachusetts sales and made sales for delivery into Massachusetts in 100 or more transactions.
  • For each calendar year beginning with 2018, if during the preceding calendar year, it had in excess of $500,000 in Massachusetts sales and made sales for delivery into Massachusetts in 100 or more transactions.

After establishing this rule, the remainder of the Directive explains how the rule complies with both state law and the requirements of the Due Process Clause and the Commerce Clause as provided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Quill Corp. v. North Dakota.4

Constitutionality of Bright-Line Standard

The Directive identifies two criteria that an out-of-state Internet vendor must meet in order to be subject to a sales or use tax collection duty in Massachusetts. Specifically, a vendor that is engaged in making taxable sales in Massachusetts or that sells taxable products for use in Massachusetts will be subject to a sales or use tax collection duty in the state if it is "engaged in business in the commonwealth" as defined under Massachusetts law and meets the constitutional standards set forth in Quill.

Engaged in Business in the Commonwealth

A Massachusetts statute lists a series of activities that will cause a vendor to be "engaged in business in the commonwealth" for purposes of the state's sales or use tax collection requirements.5 Under this statute, a vendor is "engaged in business in the commonwealth" if it "regularly or systematically solicit[s] orders for the sale of services to be performed within the commonwealth or for the sale of tangible personal property for delivery to destinations in the commonwealth" or "otherwise exploit[s] the retail sales market in the commonwealth through any means whatsoever, including, but not limited to, salesmen, solicitors or representatives in the commonwealth . . . [and] computer networks or . . . any other communications medium." Relying on this definition, the Directive explains that an Internet vendor with significant Massachusetts sales is "engaged in business in the commonwealth" because it exploits the state's retail sales market through "computer networks" and "other communications medium."

Quill Corp. v. North Dakota

Turning to the second criteria, the Directive explains that, under Quill, a sales or use tax collection duty imposed upon a mail order vendor will be valid if it meets the requirements of both the Due Process Clause and the Commerce Clause.

For due process purposes, under Quill, the state sales or use tax jurisdictional standard is met when a vendor "purposefully avails itself of the benefits of an economic market in the forum State." This requirement is satisfied when a vendor is "engaged in continuous and widespread solicitation of business within a State." The Directive explains that an Internet vendor with significant Massachusetts sales has "purposefully availed itself of the benefits of the state's economic market" by engaging in "continuous and widespread solicitation of business" in the state.

Turning its focus to the Commerce Clause, the Directive explains that the foundation of the Quill decision rested on National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue,6 which held that a mail order vendor could not be made subject to a state's sales or use tax collection duty when it limited its in-state contacts to mail and a common carrier. According to the Directive, the decision in Quill to re-affirm Bellas Hess was driven by the doctrine of stare decisis. Mail order vendors had relied on the Bellas Hess decision, and according to the Directive, stare decisis "applies with greater force when a taxpayer has reasonably relied upon a prior Supreme Court precedent."

Following its Quill analysis, the Directive draws a clear distinction between the mail order vendors found in Quill and Internet vendors, noting that Internet vendors were not the subject of Quill and Internet commerce was an unknown phenomenon at the time of the case. The Directive notes that while Quill addressed the physical presence standard in the context of mail order vendors, it did not otherwise define "physical presence." According to the Directive, Quill stands for the proposition that the existence of a vendor's in-state physical presence is to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, as "informed by the Supreme Court's precedent." The Directive explains that Quill made clear that physical presence includes situations where a vendor owns, leases or licenses in-state property, or relies upon one or more in-state representatives "to establish and maintain a market" in the state for its sales.

Activities Establishing Physical Presence

Applying its Quill analysis to Internet vendors, the Directive explains that large Internet vendors7 will have contacts with the state, beyond mail and common carrier, which will constitute an in-state physical presence. The Directive identifies several activities that create in-state physical presence.

First, large Internet vendors have software that is downloaded on an in-state customer's computer to make shopping easier. Under Massachusetts sales tax laws, software is considered tangible personal property.8 Furthermore, this software resides pervasively on nearly all in-state customers' computers or devices and is crucial to the vendor's in-state business activities. Given that Quill held that title to a few floppy diskettes represented "slightest presence,"9 the Directive reasons that a large Internet vendor's ownership of in-state software "would apparently" result in in-state physical presence under Quill.

The Directive also notes that large Internet vendors utilize cookies that are stored on their customers' computers and communication devices when the customers visit the vendor's Web site. These cookies are not software but serve a similar purpose, which is to enhance and facilitate sales. The Department explains that the ownership and use of these in-state cookies by a vendor constitutes in-state business activity that, like the in-state software, distinguishes such vendors from the mail order vendors found in Quill.

The Department also noted that large Internet vendors contract with providers of content distribution networks (CDNs) to use local servers to accelerate the delivery of their Web pages to their customers. According to the Directive, these CDNs perform activities for the vendor that "are significantly associated with the [vendor's] ability to establish and maintain a market" for its sales and, as a result, establish an in-state physical presence on behalf of the vendor. The Directive also addresses how the use of online marketplaces and delivery services by a large Internet vendor constitutes an in-state physical presence for the vendor.


With this Directive, Massachusetts follows the state trend of challenging the physical presence requirement of Quill, in the absence of more recent court decisions evaluating Quill or federal legislation on the subject. Following the lead of Wyoming,10 South Dakota,11 Vermont,12 Tennessee13 and Alabama,14 Massachusetts relies upon a bright-line standard to impose a sales tax collection requirement on certain remote sellers. However, this bright-line approach to sales tax nexus remains controversial and its constitutionality is being challenged. A South Dakota court has held that the state's bright-line standard in its sales tax nexus law is unconstitutional.15 Also, the Tennessee Chancery Court recently suspended enforcement of the state's bright-line nexus rule.16

The Directive is an interesting and novel approach that substantially differs from the methods used by the other states to implement a bright-line standard. Rather than promulgating new regulations or enacting legislation, Massachusetts has chosen to interpret existing law in a way that purportedly complies with the constitutional requirements set forth in Quill. The Directive is essentially a roadmap that provides the Department's reasoning for implementing an economic nexus standard. The Department's argument hinges on the premise that the business and activities of Internet vendors are factually and legally distinguishable from those of the mail order vendors found in Quill. By distinguishing itself from Quill in this manner, Massachusetts provides support for the supposed constitutionality of its bright-line test which relies on a large Internet vendor's use of "computer networks" and "other communications medium" to establish physical presence. It should be said, however, that while the Department's policy in this area has now been published, it is uncertain as to how much revenue this policy will bring to the state if such policy ultimately survives the constitutional challenges already being faced in other states dealing with this issue.

The Department points to a large Internet vendor's use of cookies as a rationale to establish physical presence. However, the problem that arises with this argument is that cookies are not software and the Department readily acknowledges this in the Directive.17 When the state began taxing electronically transferred software/software as a service (SaaS), e-software was placed in the same category as tangible software (e.g. CDs), with the state indicating that both formats would be considered tangible property. It appears that the Department is utilizing the same type of reasoning with cookies in order to conclude that the physical presence standard may be reached merely through the prevalent use of cookies. As cookies are not tangible property, however, using that isolated connection to Massachusetts to proclaim that physical presence has been met appears likely to be challenged.

Another issue to consider is whether the Massachusetts bright-line test contained in the Directive may violate the Internet Tax Freedom Act (ITFA).18 The ITFA places restrictions on the ability of states to tax Internet access or impose multiple or discriminatory taxes on electronic commerce.19 Illinois addressed the potential applicability of the ITFA in this situation in 2014 when it amended its sales and use tax click-through nexus statutes20 after the Illinois Supreme Court invalidated the original statutes due to the federal prohibition against discriminatory state taxes on electronic commerce contained in the ITFA.21 Specifically, under the original statute, electronic commerce transactions were treated differently than transactions that were not conducted electronically.

It is too early to tell whether the language of the Directive violates the ITFA. Under the ITFA, a "discriminatory tax" includes "any tax imposed by a State or political subdivision thereof on electronic commerce that-- . . . imposes an obligation to collect or pay the tax on a different person or entity than in the case of transactions involving similar property, goods, services, or information accomplished through other means."22 Thus, if it can be shown that the Directive treats transactions performed by Internet vendors differently than other vendors, then the Directive may violate the ITFA. According to the Department, Directives "concern current Department policy, practice or interpretation, and provide details or supplementary information, clarify ambiguities, resolve inconsistencies or explain and elaborate on issues."23 If the Directive is an interpretation of underlying law as applied to one specific type of vendor, Internet vendors, it is possible that the underlying law may treat Internet vendors differently from other vendors.


1 Directive 17-1, Massachusetts Department of Revenue, April 3, 2017. According to the Massachusetts Department of Revenue's Web site, a "Directive states the official policy of the Department, has the status of precedent unless revoked or modified, and may be relied upon by taxpayers in situations where the facts, circumstances and issues presented are substantially similar to those in the Directive." Note that the Directive terms this bright-line nexus standard as a "rule," but it is not an official administrative rule or regulation.

2 The sales and use tax nexus standards are provided by MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 64H and 64I.

3 For purposes of the Directive, "Massachusetts sales" is defined as all sales made by the vendor of tangible personal property or services delivered into the state, however consummated. 

4 504 U.S. 298 (1992).

5 MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 64H, § 1. 

6 386 U.S. 753 (1967).

7 The Directive defines "large Internet vendors" as modern-day Internet vendors with a large volume of in-state sales.

8 See the definition of "tangible personal property" in MASS. GEN. LAWS ch. 64H, § 1.

9 "Quill recognized that 'title to a few floppy diskettes present in a State might constitute some minimal nexus' but concluded that 'the existence in [a state] of a few floppy diskettes to which [the vendor] holds title' does not result in nexus because it would represent a mere de minimis or 'slightest presence.'" Citing Quill, 504 U.S. at 315 n.8. 

10 Ch. 85 (H.B. 19), Laws 2017.

11 S.D. CODIFIED LAWS §§ 10-64-1 to 10-64-9, as enacted by S.B. 106, Laws 2016. For a discussion of this legislation, see GT SALT Alert: South Dakota Enacts Legislation Challenging Quill's

12 H. 873, Laws 2016. For a discussion of the Vermont legislation, see GT SALT Alert: Vermont

13 TENN. COMP. R. & REGS. 1320-05-01-.129.

14 ALA. ADMIN. CODE R. 810-6-2-.90.03. For a discussion of this regulation, see GT SALT Alert:

15 South Dakota v. Wayfair, Inc., No. 32CIV16-000092 (S.D. 6th Cir. Ct.), order granting defendants' motion for summary judgment, March 6, 2017. For a discussion of this case, see GT SALT Alert:

16 American Catalog Mailers Ass'n v. Tennessee Department of Revenue, Tennessee Chancery Court, No. 17- forcement of Rule 129, April 10, 2017.

17 the state and serve to facilitate such vendor's in-state sales."

18 Pub. L. Nos. 105-277, 114-125.

19 For a discussion of the ITFA, see GT SALT Alert: President Obama Signs Legislation Making

20 P.A. 98-1089 (S.B. 352), Laws 2014, effective Jan. 1, 2015.

21 Performance Marketing Association, Inc. v. Hamer, 998 N.E.2d 54 (Ill. 2013). See also GT SALT Alert:

22 114-125.

23 Massachusetts Department of Revenue's Web site. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.