United States: Potential Liability For Design Defect In Use Of Button Cell Batteries

Last Updated: April 7 2017
Article by Glenn A. Gordon

A recent Report and Recommendation by a Magistrate Judge in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania may serve as a warning to companies that manufacture and supply products containing button cell batteries of potential personal injury liability for design defect claims.  

In Punch v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 12-154 (W.D. Pa.), the plaintiffs, Tony and Jennie Punch, sued for injuries resulting from their six-day-old infant son Lincoln's ingestion of two 11.6 mm button cell alkaline batteries. Lincoln ingested the button cell batteries after his three-year-old sister removed the batteries from a pair of lighted tweezers and fed them to him. Following discovery, the defendants filed motions for summary judgment asserting, among other things, that the plaintiffs' design defect and failure to warn claims were inadequate as a matter of law. In her Report and Recommendation entered on February 17, 2017, Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter recommended to the District Court judge, who will ultimately rule on the summary judgment motions, that the defendants' motions be denied as to the design defect claims (thus calling for a trial on the merits of those claims), but granted as to the failure to warn claims.

Design Defect Claims

Magistrate Judge Baxter applied a multi-factor risk-utility analysis previously endorsed by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in recommending that the case proceed with respect to the plaintiffs' strict liability design defect claim. Although the court acknowledged the utility of button cell batteries, it found that the parties' conflicting expert reports created a genuine issue of fact "as to the potential danger that an 11 mm alkaline battery poses to a child of Lincoln's age." Specifically, conflicting evidence included plaintiffs' expert opining that button cell batteries of all sizes are known to be dangerous and cause catastrophic injuries in children, and defendants' expert opining that button cell battery injuries occur with much higher frequency where battery cells are larger than 18 mm, and that the occurrence of serious injury from button cell batteries smaller than 15 mm is extremely rare.  

Magistrate Judge Baxter also found a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to the feasibility and cost of alternative designs for the battery compartment of the lighted tweezers, which "was not secured by any mechanical means and could be removed simply by grasping the case and sliding it off of the main housing."  Plaintiffs' engineering expert testified that there were at least five alternative designs, including adding a small screw to the battery housing cover, and that such alternatives would only add "a penny or two" to the manufacturing cost, although he had not performed testing of the alternative designs to confirm added safety. Defendants' expert testified that these alternative designs would add a level of inconvenience to the products that would drive them off the marketplace. The defense expert's testimony was rebutted in part, however, by evidence that other products in the marketplace did utilize some of plaintiffs' expert's proposed alterative designs. On balance, the Magistrate Judge found that the competing testimony amounted to a battle of the experts to be decided by a jury.  

The Report and Recommendation also included analyses of the ability of the plaintiffs to avoid injury through reasonable care and the public awareness of the dangers inherent in the product. Although she found that plaintiffs could have avoided the injuries through reasonable care, the Magistrate Judge found that the public awareness factor weighed against the defendants. Even though there was evidence in the record of increasing public awareness in recent years with respect to the dangers of button cell batteries, the plaintiffs testified that they were not aware that the tweezers contained such batteries. Evidence was also in dispute as to whether the lighted tweezers were accompanied at the time of sale by packaging or literature containing warnings about the dangers of the batteries.

Based on her analysis of the above factors, the Magistrate Judge found that summary judgment was inappropriate as to the design defect claims. She also rejected the defendants' related argument that the daughter's actions constituted a superseding cause of the boy's injuries. The Magistrate Judge rejected this argument despite the fact that the daughter eluded parent supervision, retrieved the lighted tweezers from the kitchen closet through the use of a step stool, removed the button cell batteries from the tweezers, and fed them to her infant brother. Even if this chain of events was far-fetched, the Magistrate Judge reasoned, there was evidence that the injuries could have been avoided if the daughter was unable to access the batteries for even a few minutes.

The Court then proceeded to analyze the sounding of plaintiffs' design defect claim under a negligence theory. The Court concluded that the same evidence resulting in genuine disputes of fact with regard to the strict liability design defect claim applied with equal force to the negligence claim.  

Failure to Warn Claims

The Magistrate Judge found, however, that the plaintiffs' strict liability and negligent failure to warn claims were not sufficient to go to a jury. In doing so, she rejected the plaintiffs' contention that they would have acted more carefully with respect to the storage of the lighted tweezers if they had been warned of the dangers of the button cell batteries. Specifically, she rejected the argument because evidence in the record showed that the plaintiffs knew the lighted tweezers as a whole were dangerous and, for that reason, had already resorted to keeping them in a kitchen closet that would be difficult for the children to access. Furthermore, she rejected the plaintiffs' argument that they would not have purchased the lighted tweezers if they had been warned that the product contained button cell batteries because evidence showed that they owned numerous other products that contained such batteries, including children's clothing and toys.  

Although personal injury litigation resulting from children's ingestion of button cell batteries is not a new phenomenon, Magistrate Judge Baxter's Report and Recommendation in Punch v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc. should serve as a reminder to manufacturers and suppliers of products containing such batteries to ensure that the evolving standards for safety of product designs, the need for adequate warnings, and the potential cost of litigation related to button cell batteries should not be overlooked. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Mondaq Free Registration
Gain access to Mondaq global archive of over 375,000 articles covering 200 countries with a personalised News Alert and automatic login on this device.
Mondaq News Alert (some suggested topics and region)
Select Topics
Registration (please scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions