United States: Podcast - Supreme Court Ruling: Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands

What impact is the Supreme Courtís recent decision in†Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, the cheerleader costume case, likely to have on the protectability of the creative elements of clothing and other useful articles?† Doug Hallward-Driemeier, who leads Ropes & Grayís Appellate & Supreme Court practice, along with Evan Gourvitz from the firmís Intellectual Property Litigation practice, offer their perspectives on the case and what it may mean for the future copyright protection of fashion and industrial design.


Hello, Iím Doug Hallward-Driemeier a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Ropes & Gray and chair of the firmís Appellate and Supreme Court practice.† Today Iím joined by IP litigation counsel Evan Gourvitz from Ropes & Grayís New York office.†

In todayís Supreme Court podcast we are going to talk about the Supreme Courtís recent copyright decision Star Athletica v. Varsity Brands, better known as the cheerleader uniform case which was decided by the Court on March 22.† The decision found that certain decorative elements of cheerleader uniforms were potentially protected by copyright law and more generally provided guidelines for assessing the copyrightability of the design elements of useful articles.† Evan can you summarize for our audience what the impact is at the high level of this decision.

Evan: Iíll lay out one technical result of the decision and the practical result of the decision.† Technically, for copyright folks the interesting thing here is that the decision rejects the long-standing distinction between physical and conceptual separability.† Iím sure weíll go into that in greater detail.† As far as the practical implications, because this decision laid out new and arguably more lenient guidelines for assessing the copyrightability of the design elements of useful articles this might end up leading to expanded attempts to protect clothing designs and industrial designs more generally through copyright law so it might lead to the fashion industry and consumer products companies more generally trying to get more expansive copyright protection for their products.†

Doug: So Evan this is an odd case in that itís not very often that we have pictures, the Supreme Court usually issues its opinions just in words, but here we have pictures of the copyrighted uniforms, and I have to confess when I look at the designs here, what I see are cheerleader uniforms, so maybe you could unpack this a little bit for us when you are talking about these doctrines of separability, how do they apply to the question presented in this case as applied to cheerleader uniforms?

Evan: This is the tricky part of the decision really.† How do you separate conceptually, physically or however you might do it, the copyrightable and protectable aspects of any given cheerleader uniform from cheerleader uniforms more generally.† As you said, the decision does include pictures and if you look at the pictures (and we canít really do that on a podcast), you see that the designs that are protected are essentially geometric design elements, chevrons and other aspects of sort of a conventional looking cheerleader costume that, considered in their entirety, make up the whole thing. They make up the whole costume.† Itís not like a picture of Mickey Mouse on a t-shirt where you can say well yes thereís a t-shirt and it has this completely separable illustration of Mickey Mouse on it; rather, all of the elements or essentially all of the elements of the cheerleader uniform are encompassed by this design, and this is exactly why in copyright law, the doctrine of separability came about.

Doug: I was taken by the fact that this was an opinion that was written by Justice Thomas and Justice Thomas is famous for being I suppose a quintessential originalist.† He doesnít really care much for legislative history or what courts have said legislation means over the years.† He goes back to the original text as written and asks what does this mean.† So in this case, he seems to have gone back to the language of Section 101, which says that the design, if it incorporates pictoral graphic and sculptural features that can be identified separately from and are capable of existing independently of the utilitarian aspects of the article, they would be eligible for copyright protection.† But Iím focused on this language ďcapable of existing independently of.Ē †I suppose thatís where the physical separability test comes from. †How does the Courtís analysis square with that?

Evan: I think that there is sort of a reasonable roadmap here.† Traditionally, the separability of the pictorial graphic or sculptural elements of a useful article were sort of broken down into two categories: physical separability and conceptual separability.† Physical separability simply meant, can you cut the darn thing off.† So for example, could the hood ornament of a car be protectable even though its part of a car?† Yes, because itís physically separable.† Conceptual separability was slightly different and was figured basically by the argument can you sort of conceive of the protectable elements sort of existing in and of themselves as an illustration or a sculpture.† Generally, the way that courts and for that matter the legislative history understood that was basically to say, can you remove the copyrightable elements so at the end you have two different things.† You have the copyrightable elements as a sculpture or illustration and you nevertheless still have a completely functional item without the illustration or sculpture on the other end.† What this decision did was abolish it and as you pointed out, itís a little tricky when you take a look at the language of the Copyright Act itself because it does say that to be protectable, the design elements have to be identified separately from and are capable of existing independently of the utilitarian aspects of the article. †Traditionally, that was understood as meaning you have to have copyrightable elements here on one side, you have to have the useful article on the other side.† They both have to exist in and of themselves, but what Justice Thomasí decision does is that it points out that this doesnít have to work both ways.† That is, if you look at the actual language it says that the pictorial graphic or sculptural features must be identified separately from and must be capable of existing independently of the utilitarian aspects, but the statute itself does not say it has to go vice versa.† It doesnít say that the utilitarian aspects have to exist independently themselves.† So basically what this test says and the way that Justice Thomas interpreted it was by saying you know look at that cheerleader uniform, look at that t-shirt, look at that hood ornament, can you basically take the graphic or sculptural elements, rip them off and kind of slap them on a blank wall.† And if so, can you identify look, that would be a protectable work in and of itself.† If so, itís protectable and if there is nothing left over in terms of the utilitarian work afterwards, well it doesnít matter, the test doesnít go both ways.† It just goes one way.†

Doug: So if there is nothing left over, does that mean that in effect the item itself is susceptible to copyright protection?

Evan:†††† Well thatís really the trickiest issue here.† And thatís the most problematic one.† The dissent to this decision basically says, yeah thatís kind of what happens at the end.† If you basically say that an entire item is protectable in and of itself, whatís left?† Can you basically copyright a shovel.† Can you basically say that every sort of physical aspect of the shovel should be protectable by copyright because a picture of the shovel would be protectable.† The dissent says no that canít be right thatís just sort of an absurd result so we canít accept it.† And I think this is something that really is going to have to kind of work its way through the Copyright Office as they try to sort of interpret the extent and sort of scope of where this will lead us.

Doug: As a practical matter, what do you think this means in terms of the interest of those I guess top-end manufacturers who have the designs and their relationships with their knockoff competitors?

Evan: I think what this means is that going forward, apparel companies, clothing companies for that matter, even industrial design companies are going to go to the Copyright Office and they are going to try to register their works, whether that is a particular dress design or for that matter a particular shovel design and basically say we want to register the sculptural or ornamental aspects of this product.† We are not trying to register the useful article itself, rather we are just trying to register the pictorial graphic or sculptural features of this useful article which just happened to encompass the entirety of the useful article.† And then the Copyright Office will then have to consider that given this decision and really sort of have to work out for themselves where it is they can draw the line, especially now that there is no real split between physical separability and conceptual separability.†

Doug: How searching of an inquiry does the Copyright Office apply in deciding whether to register an application?

Evan: As a general matter they donít do a very searching inquiry at all.† Honestly, I don't actually prosecute copyright applications, but I have dealt with a couple of appeals where the Copyright Office has rejected a given work as being insufficiently original.† So generally they just take a look at a work to determine whether it constitutes copyrightable subject material and if it does, they register it.† On rare occasions, they basically say hereís some guidance you can only claim this part of a work but not that part.† I think they are going to have a harder time doing that going forward and basically saying no you can only copyright this part and not that part.† But I guess we are going to have to see.† Once companies do get registrations, assuming they do, we will also have to see how the courts actually deal with the litigation of infringement cases involving these potentially expanded works and where they draw the line between granting a company copyright protection in its original work of authorship and basically just utilitarian articles as utilitarian articles.

Doug: So I can see that we can expect the applicants to be more aggressive in what they are seeking copyright protection of, but even if they are successful, there are defenses available for entities that might be subject to suit for copyright infringement?

Evan: Sure, I mean even in this case, Justice Thomas basically says while we consider this cheerleader uniform design to be potentially protectable, we are not opining on whether it is in fact in and of itself copyrightable.† There might be other reasons why it might not be. For example, this design might not be sufficiently original to qualify for a copyright.† There may have been many other cheerleader uniforms created by third-parties before this, making this work a derivative work based on those other works.† Defendants in cases are also going to have all sorts of arguments, including fair use.† They might be able to claim that the original owners might not have obtained all the necessary rights from the author of the original work. †There are still plenty of defenses that people should be able to bring up.†

Doug: So it seems that this may open a whole new chapter in kinds of litigation that weíll have on a new playing field in terms of these design copyrights.† So stay tuned for further developments, but thatís all the time we have today.† Thank you Evan for joining me in this interesting conversation and hopefully we will be able to have another Supreme Court podcast soon.† In the meantime, thank you all for listening and please visit our Capital Insights page at www.ropesgray.com for more news and analysis on noteworthy issues arising out of Washington D.C.

Download Podcast

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think youíve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.comís content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltdís services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) Ė meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with ďno disclosureĒ in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a userís hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friendís name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our usersí information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a userís personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that userís personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the ďYour ProfileĒ page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.