United States: The Media Scores A "Win" At The Texas Supreme Court

Last Updated: March 9 2017
Article by Joseph Larsen

The Texas Supreme Court's opinion in Brady v. Klentzman, --- S.W.3d ----, 2017 WL 387217 (Tex. 2017) has been characterized as a "win" for the media after a "tough week," but its practical import appears to further expose the media to defamation lawsuits for reporting on matters of public concern. Brady was a clear win for the media in that the court reiterated several important First Amendment principles. The court, however, ultimately sent the case back to the jury for a new trial with a different jury charge rather than dismiss the case for failure to prove any actual damages.
The plaintiff, Wade Brady, sued regarding a newspaper article that, among other things, portrayed him as "unruly and intoxicated" when he interacted with a state trooper and described that Wade's father, the chief sheriff's deputy, "continually made contact with the officers" who ticketed his son and described that the officers "were intimidated" when Chief Brady "demanded any and all audio tapes or notes from that incident in their possession." Personnel in the sheriff's office were "wondering when the other shoe will drop." The article included reporting of other prior encounters of a similar nature.
Wade sued for libel and libel per se, alleging that the article was a malicious attempt to portray him as a criminal who used his father's connections to skirt the charges filed against him. According to Wade, the newspaper "consciously ignored the truth in preparing the story," by never disclosing that he was acquitted of the minor-in-possession charge. The jury assessed $50,000 in actual damages for mental anguish and damages to Wade's reputation as well as punitive damages of $1,000,000, which the trial court reduced to $200,000 without requiring the plaintiff to prove that the newspaper's statements were false and without a finding that the newspaper knew the statements were false or was reckless regarding their falsity.
The court of appeals — holding that the article covered a matter of public concern — reversed and remanded for a new trial, so the jury could evaluate the evidence under the proper standard. In affirming the court of appeals' opinion, the Texas Supreme Court recognized that the First Amendment (1) requires that a private individual who sues a media defendant for defamation over statements of public concern bear the burden of proof that the statements were false (citing Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. Hepps, 475 U.S. 767, 776–77 (1986)) and (2) in order to recover punitive damages, such a plaintiff has the burden of proof that the defendant acted with "knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth" (citing Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323, 349 (1974)).
The court noted the U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence holding that speech deals with matters of public concern when it can be "fairly considered as relating to any matter of political, social, or other concern to the community." (citing Snyder v. Phelps, 562 U.S. 443 (2011)). The court held that the salacious details of Wade's encounters with law enforcement directly relate to the general subject matter of the article: Chief Brady's use of authority on Wade's behalf. Courts have declined "to get involved in deciding the newsworthiness of specific details in a newsworthy story where the details were 'substantially related' to the story" and should not "make editorial decisions for the media regarding information directly related to matters of public concern." 
Because the entire article must be considered as embracing matters of public concern, the trial court jury charge did not comply with First Amendment standards. Although falsity was not an element of defamation at common law, the First Amendment requires private individuals to meet the burden of proof that statements made by media defendants on matters of public concern are false, but here the jury charge required the media defendants to prove that their statements were true. The First Amendment also requires that a private plaintiff prove actual malice, that is, "knowledge of falsity or reckless disregard for the truth," before recovering anything more than actual damages for a statement on a matter of public concern, but "malice" in the jury charge referred only to an intent to cause injury or conscious indifference to the risk of injury; it was not tied to the truth or falsity of the statements. The court ruled that in addition to proving the traditional "malice" required to obtain exemplary damages under Texas law, one seeking exemplary damages for speech on a public matter must also prove constitutional "actual malice."
These excellent holdings are based largely upon the court's own precedent and established First Amendment jurisprudence. The higher standard in the jury charge may foreclose a jury finding against the newspaper in the retrial. The court, however, sent the case back to the jury on thin evidence of damages, raising the specter of a jury trial based upon speculation in a media-unfriendly environment. It is important to this analysis that while Wade pleaded that the statements in the article were defamatory per se, which refers to statements that are so obviously harmful that general damages such as mental anguish and loss of reputation may be presumed, he did not argue this theory at trial, but rather argued that there was evidence of mental-anguish and loss-of-reputation damages in the record.
The court noted that damages in defamation cases must compensate for "actual injuries" and cannot merely be "a disguised disapproval of the defendant." That is, there must be evidence that people believed the statements and the plaintiff's reputation was actually affected. The court held that Wade had presented such evidence. However, the evidence as summarized by the dissent seems to fall short of the mark:

One cannot fairly infer that Wade's reputation was injured at all, let alone on account of the article. If anything, even assuming that the article was related to Wade's being asked to quit his job, he returned to the same job, indicating that his reputation was not injured. This was no evidence that Wade's reputation suffered in any way, and certainly no evidence of an injury for which $30,000 would be reasonable compensation.

With regard to Wade's claims of mental anguish, the evidence is that Wade, shy and introverted before the article, was shy and introverted after the article. This would be far less than would be required as evidence for compensable mental anguish in a case involving any other type of tort — for example a slip and fall. This is a case attacking speech regarding a matter of public concern.
The Greek tyrant Pyrrhus is reputed to have said, following the Battle of Ascalum, "If we are victorious in one more battle with the Romans, we shall be utterly ruined." After this "win" before the Texas Supreme Court, we might watch warily for the next media victory.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions