United States: Post Daimler AG v. Bauman Decisions

Recent Court Rulings Applying Bauman Create a Path for Defendants to Win Dismissal Based on a Lack of Personal Jurisdiction

Nationwide, courts are applying the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Daimler AG v. Bauman and granting defendants' motions to dismiss based on a lack of personal jurisdiction. Here are a few noteworthy examples.

On September 30, 2016, in Bauer v. Nortek Global HVAC LLC, the Middle District of Tennessee granted the defendants' motion to dismiss, holding that the Court lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants.1 Applying Bauman, the Court held that it lacked general jurisdiction over the defendants because they were not essentially at home in Tennessee. Defendants were neither incorporated nor headquartered in the state.2 The Court also held that one of the defendant's in-state facilities did not meet the "continuous and systematic contacts" test, finding that, under Bauman, a defendants' "mere presence" in the forum state is not sufficient to find general jurisdiction.3 Finally, as to specific jurisdiction — which the Court noted requires a connection between the forum and the controversy and is "confined to adjudication of issues deriving from, or connected with, the very controversy that establishes jurisdiction"4 — the Court held that, under the Sixth Circuit's three-part test,5 the plaintiffs failed to "offer any factual allegations that the outof- state Plaintiffs had any dealings with the Defendants" in the state.6

On October 25, 2016, in Addelson v. Sanofi, the Eastern District of Missouri held similarly, finding that, under Bauman, the Court did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendants.7 First, citing two post-Bauman federal district court cases, the Court noted that while federal courts "customarily"8 resolve subject matter jurisdiction issues first, here personal jurisdiction merited an initial resolution because it was straightforward.9 Second, the Court found that the defendants were incorporated in Delaware, had their principal place of business in New Jersey, and that the complaint lacked facts to "establish continuous and systematic contacts with Missouri[.]"10The Court held that, under Bauman, "[s]imply doing continuous and systematic business in a state is not enough to establish general jurisdiction."11 The plaintiffs' allegations that Sanofi "distributed, marketed, promoted, and sold" the drug in Missouri was insufficient.12 Third, noting the plaintiffs' argument that Sanofi consented to general jurisdiction in Missouri by registering with the State's secretary of state and maintaining a registered agent there (as required by state law to do business there), the Court held that "more substantial contacts are required to hale a litigant into the Court's forum," finding that to hold otherwise would subject national companies to "suits in almost every state in the country continued 2 [which] would not comport with the principles of personal jurisdiction" established in Bauman.13

State courts have joined the party too. On April 18, 2016, faced with whether its own "interpretation of [Delaware's] registration statutes as conferring general jurisdiction over the foreign corporation remains tenable," based on the "major shift in our nation's personal jurisdiction jurisprudence" due to Bauman, the Supreme Court of Delaware overturned its precedent and held that Delaware's business registration statutes did not provide general jurisdiction over out-ofstate businesses.14 Finding that its early case law had read Delaware law "broadly as providing a basis for general jurisdiction," the Court held that "although it is possible, as [it had done], to read the concept of general jurisdiction into [the statute] . . . it is also possible to give that statute a narrower and constitutionally unproblematic reading."15 The Court determined that this narrower reading had the "intuitively sensible effect" of avoiding the U.S. Supreme Court's concern regarding subjecting foreign corporations "to an 'unacceptably grasping' and 'exorbitant' exercise of jurisdiction, consistent with Daimler's teachings,"16 whereas the Court's previous "construction . . . was strongly influenced by prior U.S. Supreme Court jurisprudence whose dependability has been undermined by Daimler."17 Finally, noting that "[t]he tension created by's Due-Process [l]imits [o]n [g]eneral [j]urisdiction [c]annot [b]e [i]gnored," the Court found that a state cannot "condition a foreign corporation's right to do business on consent to general jurisdiction" and that "a foreign corporation's consent to personal jurisdiction cannot be coerced or conditioned on the corporation waiving its right not to be subject to all-purpose jurisdiction in all but a few places where it has sufficient contacts."18

Slowing down the exuberance for dismissal, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in Bors v. Johnson & Johnson, found that, under pre-Bauman Third Circuit case law not directly overturned by Bauman, it had general personal jurisdiction because, while Johnson & Johnson had no contacts with Pennsylvania and the plaintiff's action arose from transactions that occurred outside that commonwealth, the company had consented by simply registering to do business in the state.19 The Court held that unlike Delaware's registration statute, Pennsylvania's statute "specifically advis[es] the [foreign corporation] registrant of its consent to personal jurisdiction through registration" and that this explicit warning meant that "general and specific jurisdiction principles applying to non-consensual personal jurisdiction do not apply."20

Bauman has reset the landscape for permissible pleadings. Defendants may now consider motions to dismiss in cases where a plaintiff's personal jurisdiction claims are rooted in pre-Bauman case law. Moreover, while plaintiffs and some courts (as in Bors) may attempt to preserve jurisdiction by consent, defendants should carefully examine the due process arguments made by the Delaware Supreme Court in Genuine Parts. As Genuine Parts makes clear, this notion does not align with Bauman's due process concerns and the Supreme Court's conclusion that general jurisdiction is rooted in a defendant's home jurisdiction. Defendants should also point to the Addelson court's decision to resolve general jurisdiction prior to complex subject matter jurisdiction issues since it may comport with judicial economy and, most especially, save the parties time and money when defendants are not at home in the chosen jurisdiction.

Of course, the landscape could significantly change again when the U.S. Supreme Court rules in Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the Supreme Court's upcoming review of a California Supreme Court decision in which the State court took a very broad view of specific personal jurisdiction, permitting numerous out-of-state plaintiffs to sue in California courts.21 The case, which was granted certiorari in January, will be argued later this year. Stay tuned.


1.No. 3:14-CV-1940, 2016 WL 5724232 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 30, 2016).

2.Id. at *5.

3. Id. at *6.

4. Id. (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

5. Id. ("First, the defendant must purposefully avail himself of the privilege of acting in the forum state or causing a consequence in the forum state. Second, the cause of action must arise from the defendant's activities there. Finally, the acts of the defendant or consequences caused by the defendant must have a substantial enough connection with the forum state to make the exercise of jurisdiction over the defendant reasonable.") (quoting S. Machine Co. v. Mohasco Indus., Inc., 401 F.2d 374, 381 (6th Cir. 1968)).

6. Id.

7. No. 4:16-CV-01277 ERW, 2016 WL 6216124 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 25, 2016).

8. Id. at *2 (quoting Ruhrgas AG v. Marathon Oil Co., 526 U.S. 574, 578 (1999)).

9. Id. (citing Guillette v. PD–RX Pharmaceuticals Inc., No. 5:15-CV-00564–R, 2016 WL 3094073 at *2 (W.D. Okla. June 1, 2016); In re Testosterone Replacement Therapy Prods. Liab. Coordinated Pretrial Proceedings, 164 F. Supp. 3d 1040, 1045–46 (N.D. Ill. 2016)).

10.Id. at *3. Facts such as "maintain[ing] an office in Missouri, or employees here, or any other facts, which would suggest [Sanofi is] at home in Missouri." (Id.).

11. Id. (citing Bauman, 134 S. Ct. at 760–61).

12. Id. Regarding specific jurisdiction, the Court noted its power over a defendant regarding "specific claims, because of the relationship between the defendant, forum, and the litigation," (citing Bauman, 134 S. Ct. at 758), i.e., the existence of a "nexus between a plaintiff's claims and a defendant's forum-based activities" (quoting In re: Zofran (Ondansetron) Prods. Liab. Litig., No. 1:15-CV-13760-FDS, 2016 WL 2349105 at *5 (D. Mass. May 4, 2016)).

13. Id. (citing Keeley v. Pfizer Inc., No. 4:15-CV-0058-3 ERW, 2015 WL 3999488 at *4 (E.D. Mo. July 1, 2015); Neeley v. Wyeth LLC, 4:11-CV-00325-JAR, 2015 WL 1456984 at *3 (E.D. Mo. Mar. 30, 2015)).

14. Genuine Parts Co. v. Cepec, 137 A.3d 123, 137, 133 (Del. 2016) (citing Sternberg v. O'Neil, 550 A.2d 1105 (Del. 1988)).

15. Id. at 138-39.

16. Id. at 141.

17. Id. at 141-42.

18.Id. at 144-47.

19. Bors v. Johnson & Johnson, --- F.Supp.3d ----, No. 16- 2866, 2016 WL 5172816 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 20, 2016).

20.Id. at *1

21. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of San Francisco Cty., 206 Cal. Rptr. 3d (2016), cert. granted sub nom. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of California, San Francisco Cty., No. 16-466, 2017 WL 215687 (U.S. Jan. 19, 2017).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.