United States: Florida Supreme Court: Federal PSQIA Does Not Pre-empt State's Constitution

Erica Gooden Bartimmo is an Associate in our Tampa office.


  • The Florida Supreme Court has held that the federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA) is not and was never intended to be a shield to prevent the production of documents required under Florida's Constitution.
  • In Charles v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc., the state's high court further held that Article X, Section 25, of the Florida Constitution (Amendment 7) is neither expressly nor impliedly pre-empted by the PSQIA.
  • As such, adverse medical incident reports produced in conformity with state law and requested by patients under Amendment 7 cannot be classified as confidential and privileged "patient safety work product" under the PSQIA.

In Charles v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc., published on Jan. 31, 2017, the Florida Supreme Court held that the federal Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act (PSQIA) is not and was never intended to be a shield to prevent the production of documents required under Florida's Constitution.

The state's high court further held that Article X, Section 25, of the Florida Constitution (Amendment 7) is neither expressly nor impliedly pre-empted by the PSQIA. Therefore, reports and records generated under the federal law can still be discoverable in Florida.

Legislative Background

In November 2004, Florida voters approved Amendment 7, which became Article X, Section 25, of the Florida Constitution. Amendment 7 provides "a right to have access to any records made or received in the course of business by a health care facility or provider relating to any adverse medical incident." According to the Florida Supreme Court in Florida Hospital Waterman, Inc. v. Buster, decided in 2008, Amendment 7's clear purpose was to do away with existing restrictions on a patient's right to access a medical provider's history of adverse medical incidents and to provide a clear path to obtain those records. Amendment 7 effectively did away with the Florida statutes restricting access to such records.

In effect, Amendment 7 created a right for patients to know about adverse medical incidents that previously existed and removed the cloak of privilege and confidentiality from records that fell under the ambit of Amendment 7. In Baldwin v. Shands Teaching Hosp. and Clinics, Inc., the First District Court of Appeal stated that "[t]he Florida Supreme Court has recognized that this popularly adopted amendment affects, or even abrogates, statutes that previously exempted records of investigations, proceedings, and records of peer review panels from discovery in civil or administrative actions."1

A year after the adoption of Amendment 7, the U.S. Congress passed the Patient Safety and Quality Improvement Act of 2005 (PSQIA). The passing of the PSQIA followed the 1999 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. In the report, the IOM estimated that at least 44,000 people and potentially as many as 98,000 people die in U.S. hospitals each year as a result of preventable medical errors. The IOM report recommended that legislation be passed to foster the development of a reporting system through which medical errors could be identified, analyzed and utilized to prevent further medical errors.2 Through passage of the Act and its privileges, Congress sought to "facilitate an environment in which health care providers are able to discuss errors openly and learn from them."3

PSQIA was intended to replace a "culture of blame" and punishment with a "culture of safety" that emphasizes communication and cooperation.4 PSQIA creates a voluntary, confidential, non-punitive system of data sharing of healthcare errors for the purpose of improving the quality of medical care and patient safety. PSQIA envisions that each participating provider or member would establish a patient safety evaluation system (PSE system) in which relevant information would be collected, managed and analyzed.5 After the information is collected in the PSE system, the provider would forward it to its patient safety organization (PSO), which serves to collect and analyze the data and provide feedback and recommendations to providers on ways to improve patient safety and quality of care.6 Information reported to PSOs would also be shared with a central clearing house, the Network of Patient Safety Databases, which aggregates the data and makes it available to providers as an "evidence-based management resource."7

To incentivize participation, a protected legal environment was created in which providers would be comfortable sharing data both within and across state lines "without the threat of information being used against [them]."8 Privilege and confidentiality protections attach to the shared information, termed "patient safety work product" (PSWP) to "encourage providers to share this information without fear of liability[.]"9The protections are "the foundation to furthering the overall goal of the statute to develop a national system for analyzing and learning from patient safety events."10

Case Background

In Charles v. Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida, Inc., the Florida Supreme Court examined the important constitutional issue regarding whether reports that patients in Florida have a constitutional right to access under Amendment 7 are privileged and confidential under the PSQIA.11 In this case, Jean Charles Jr., initiated a medical malpractice action as next friend of his sister, who had suffered a neurological injury. During the discovery phase of the case, Charles requested documents pursuant to Amendment 7. Specifically, Charles requested documents that were 1) related to adverse medical incidents, and 2) either related to any physician who worked for Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida (Southern Baptist) or arising from care and treatment rendered by Southern Baptist. In response to Charles' request, Southern Baptist produced certain documents and objected to producing other documents, primarily occurrence reports, claiming privilege under the PSQIA.

Charles moved to compel production of the documents that Southern Baptist claimed were privileged. He argued that the PSQIA protects documents created only for the purpose of submission to a PSO and that the subject documents did not constitute PSWP because they were collected or maintained to comply with state law. In a series of three orders, the trial court agreed with Charles and reasoned that the subject documents were not PSWP because they were collected or maintained for a purpose other than submission to a PSO (i.e., there was dual purpose). Consequently, the trial court held that "all reports of adverse medical incidents, as defined by Amendment 7 which are created, or maintained pursuant to any statutory ... requirements are not protected from discovery under [the PSQIA]."

First District Court of Appeal

In response to the unfavorable trial court rulings, Southern Baptist filed a petition for writ of certiorari in Florida's First District Court of Appeal. The First District granted the petition and quashed the three trial court orders. It opined that under the plain language of the PSQIA, the subject documents were PSWP because the documents were placed into a PSE system for reporting to a PSO and did not exist outside the PSE system. The First District noted that the "documents at issue clearly meet the [PSQIA's] definition of PSWP." In addition, the First District opined that the PSQIA expressly and impliedly pre-empts Amendment 7 under the Supremacy Clause.

Charles appealed the First District's decision. After the parties fully briefed the case before the Florida Supreme Court and the day before oral arguments, the parties filed a stipulation of dismissal. The Florida Supreme Court rejected the stipulation, reasoning that the case involved an issue of statewide importance and that the First District's holding that federal law pre-empted Amendment 7 rendered it invalid.

Florida Supreme Court Opinion

The Florida Supreme Court examined the language of the PSQIA and whether it expressly or impliedly pre-empts Amendment 7.

The state's high court noted that the First District's reading of the PSQIA was in error because it failed to consider the statute as a whole. The First District failed to consider the "numerous exceptions and limitations placed on the PSQIA." For example, although the PSQIA generally states that documents placed into a PSE system that do not exist outside the system are privileged and confidential work product, the PSQIA also makes clear that its provisions shall not be construed to limit "the discovery of or admissibility of information described in this subparagraph in a criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding," or "a provider's recordkeeping obligation with respect to information described in this subparagraph under Federal, State, or local law."12

The Florida Supreme Court opined that the subject documents fit squarely within the recordkeeping obligations under state law. In fact, the Florida Supreme Court held that records do not become PSWP simply because they are placed in a PSE system or submitted to a PSO, because providers have an independent obligation under Florida law to create and maintain them. As such, adverse medical incident reports produced in conformity with state law and requested by patients under Amendment 7 cannot be classified as confidential and privileged PSWP under the PSQIA. Moreover, the Florida Supreme Court held that the PSQIA neither expressly nor impliedly pre-empted Amendment 7. 


1 45 So. 3d 118, 123 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010).

2 See S. Rep. No. 108–196, at 3–4 (2003); H.R. Rep. No. 109–197, at 9 (2005).

3 H.R. Rep. No. 109–197, at 9 (2005); see also Patient Safety and Quality Improvement, 73 Fed. Reg. 8,112, 8,113 (proposed Feb. 12, 2008).

4 See S. Rep. No. 108–196, at 2 (2003); 73 Fed. Reg. at 70,749.

5 42 U.S.C. §299b–21(6).

6 See 42 U.S.C. §299b–24; 73 Fed. Reg. at 70,733.

7 See 42 U.S.C. §299b–23.

8 Id.

9 73 Fed. Reg. at 70,732; 42 U.S.C. §299b–22(a)–(b).

10 73 Fed. Reg. at 70,741.

11 No. SC15-2180, 2017 WL 411333 (Fla. Jan. 31, 2017).

12  U.S.C. §299b-21(7)(B)(iii).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions