On December 22, 2016, ESMA published the results of a peer review it has conducted into how national regulators ensure and assess compliance by CCPs with the margin and collateral requirements under EMIR. ESMA has a coordination role between national regulators to build a common supervisory culture and consistent supervisory practices. ESMA is required to conduct a peer review of the supervisory activities of the national regulators of CCPs at least annually. ESMA's report on the peer review provides an overview of the approaches of national regulators and sets out ESMA's assessment of the degree of convergence between those approaches. ESMA found inconsistencies in the frequency and depth of the supervision of CCPs (even for CCPs of a similar size or complexity). ESMA highlights various areas for improvement to enhance supervisory convergence, including identification of new services which require an extension of a CCP's authorization, determining significant changes to a CCP's risk model and the ongoing review of CCP collateral policies. The report sets out some examples of good practice that ESMA observed during the review, such as having direct access to the data of a supervised CCP. ESMA intends to follow up on the findings from the peer review by, amongst other things, identifying appropriate tools to enhance supervisory convergence.
ESMA's peer review report is available at: https://www.esma.europa.eu/sites/default/files/library/2016-1683_ccp_peer_review_report.pdf .
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.