United States: Second Circuit Denies En Banc Rehearing Of Stored Communications Act Decision In Microsoft Case

Last summer, in a closely watched decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit quashed a warrant issued to Microsoft seeking a customer's electronic communications that the company had elected to store on a server in Ireland. As we reported at the time in a Kramer Levin Alert, a three-judge panel of the court declined to uphold the warrant, issued by a magistrate judge pursuant to the Stored Communications Act (SCA). The court concluded that requiring Microsoft to access the files stored overseas and turn them over to the government would amount to an extraterritorial application of the law. According to the panel, the SCA should not be applied extraterritorially because Congress had not expressed its intent for the SCA to apply outside of the United States. The panel further found that, in this particular case, the government was not seeking to apply the statute domestically because execution of the warrant would require the seizure of communications stored in Ireland. 

Last week, in a 4-4 vote, the full court of the Second Circuit denied the government's petition to rehear the case en banc, leaving the ruling quashing the warrant in place. Judge Carney, who wrote the original panel decision, concurred with three other judges in the denial of rehearing en banc, and authored an opinion defending the original ruling. Judges Jacobs, Cabranes, Raggi and Droney each wrote opinions dissenting from the denial, and then joined in the dissents of the other three. Judges Pooler, Livingston and Lohier Jr. did not participate in the rehearing decision.

Similar arguments run through the four dissents, many of which were also made by the government in its petition for rehearing. Because the government may very well seek certiorari to the Supreme Court on the difficult question presented in this case, it is worthwhile to briefly review the arguments, with a focus on those now writing in dissent.

Judge Carney Defends the Original Majority Panel Decision

Judge Carney, author of the original panel decision, defended that ruling, arguing that it was properly based on a textual analysis of the SCA guided by the approach to extraterritoriality laid down by the Supreme Court in Morrison and refined in RJR Nabisco. Because the data at issue was stored overseas, and because Microsoft would need to access those communications to enforce the warrant, the original panel — which included Judge Carney, Judge Lynch (who authored a concurring opinion) and District Judge Bolden, sitting by designation — concluded that the order qualified as an impermissible extraterritorial application of a statute that Congress must be presumed to have intended to apply only within the United States. While Judge Carney lamented the "anachronistic" nature of the SCA and acknowledged that a recalibrated statutory regime might produce a different result, she stood by the original panel's decision as a faithful application of the words of the law to the facts at hand.

The Dissents

In his dissent, Judge Jacobs offered what he considered a relatively "reductionist" approach as compared to his fellow dissenters, concluding that because no extraterritorial "reach" was required to "deliver" the information sought by the government, the warrant was domestic and properly issued. The communications covered by the warrant could be obtained by Microsoft with ease from one of the company's computer terminals in Washington state, so the fact that the data happened to be stored in Ireland was immaterial. As he put it, "[e]xtraterritoriality need not be fussed over when the information sought is already within the grasp of a domestic entity served with a warrant."

Disagreeing with the denial of rehearing, Judge Cabranes claimed that the panel's opinion created a "roadmap" for evading detection of criminal activity conducted in part through electronic communications: Simply inform your service provider that you live overseas, which, with luck, will prompt it to store your data abroad, beyond the reach of a warrant under the SCA. Highlighting the decision's immediate impact, Judge Cabranes observed that major companies like Google and Yahoo have already begun limiting their cooperation with the government by producing only data stored in the United States at the moment they are served with a warrant under the SCA. Accepting the original majority panel's reading that the SCA was designed to protect customer privacy, Judge Cabranes would hold that this privacy interest is affected, and thus the warrant is enforced, at the moment of disclosure of the communications in the United States, not at the moment of its access by the service provider. 

Judge Raggi also disagreed with the original panel's conclusion, calling it "simply unprecedented" to hold that the presumption against extraterritoriality would prohibit the issuance of a warrant to a United States entity to produce property in its possession. Judge Raggi argued that warrants issued under the SCA function not as traditional warrants focusing on places to be searched, but rather as subpoenas targeting persons, to be executed by service providers when customer content is disclosed to the government. Thus, even assuming that the original panel majority was correct to identify "privacy" as the focus of the SCA, Judge Raggi agreed with Judge Cabranes that the customer's privacy is compromised not when materials are returned to the United States from abroad by Microsoft (an action for which they need no permission from the customer or the government), but rather at the instant the communications are disclosed to the government. It is the moment of disclosure at which the warrant is executed, not the moment of access. Therefore, as disclosure would occur within the United States, there would be no extraterritorial application of the SCA in executing the warrant.

After acknowledging the good faith efforts of the original majority panel to accomplish the difficult task of applying the SCA to a factual scenario that its drafters could not have foreseen, Judge Droney also took issue with the denial of rehearing en banc for several reasons. Judge Droney wrote that the privacy interests of the customer were adequately protected by the neutral magistrate who issued the initial warrant, and reasoned that, because Microsoft's compliance with the warrant would occur in the United States, there was no extraterritorial application of the statute in this case. "It makes no difference," Judge Droney wrote, "that Microsoft has chosen to store some electronic communications in other countries. That decision is based on its own business considerations, not privacy concerns for its customers."

The Next Chapter?  Supreme Court Review or Legislative Action

With an equal division amongst the participating judges of the Second Circuit in such an important case, we may see the Department of Justice seek Supreme Court review of the decision. While the parties and the judges disagree on many issues, all concur that congressional action to modernize the legal framework for protecting the privacy of digital communications and for requiring their production to the government in the course of criminal investigations would be welcome. In the absence of a Supreme Court ruling or legislative action to amend or replace the SCA, the Second Circuit's ruling stands, and for the time being the government may have to rely on mutual legal assistance treaties and other mechanisms of cooperation with foreign nations to obtain stored communications held on servers overseas.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions