United States: Antitrust Analysis Of Joint Ventures: An Introduction

Last Updated: February 10 2017
Article by Antitrust Watch

Joint ventures ("JVs") can require navigation of a potential minefield of antitrust issues, which we'll explore in a series of six blog posts beginning with this introductory post. Not all of the law in this area is entirely settled, and there remain ongoing debates about some aspects of the antitrust treatment of JVs.  Indeed, arriving at a coherent and unified view of JV law is like putting together a jigsaw puzzle with missing and damaged pieces.

Before digging into some of the legal issues, however, let's first take a step back to establish some agreed-upon definitions and consider why you should care about antitrust law if you are forming, operating, selling or buying a JV.

What Is a Joint Venture?

Let's start with a well-known "secret" of antitrust law that may nevertheless surprise non-antitrust specialists: there is no well-established definition of the term "joint venture" for antitrust purposes. Although "joint venture" may be a well-defined term in other areas of the law or in business practice, using the term cavalierly in the context of antitrust analysis may be tantamount to committing the sin of synecdoche (i.e., may be under- or over-inclusive)–and may therefore cause us to miss and overlook important issues and questions because we're, for example, using a potentially narrow term to refer to a broader canvas of activities.

In fact, for antitrust law purposes, the term "JV" is flexible and reaches many types of activity that you might not otherwise think of as a JV. The term of course reaches traditional formal business collaborations between or among companies to produce or buy products or services.  But the antitrust analysis of joint ventures also reaches, or can reach, trade associations, standard-setting bodies, patent pools, agreements to jointly market products, and even professional and amateur sports leagues.

A related issue is how to distinguish a JV from a full-blown merger, which is subject to merger control analysis. Not surprisingly, the conventional wisdom is that a JV is something less than a full-blown merger, but the dividing line between the two categories is not always a bright one.

A better term for "JV" might be "competitor collaboration," but even that term has its limitations. For one thing, potential competitors can count in or towards the antitrust analysis, and it can sometimes be difficult to determine when firms are legitimate potential competitors.  In addition, although vertical collaborations between non-competitors typically do not raise substantial antitrust concerns, they are not immune from antitrust liability.

With the above caveats in mind, we'll use the terms "joint venture" and "JV" throughout this series of blog posts, if only because many of the cases and agency guidance documents have used and continue to use those terms.

Why Should I Care About Antitrust and Joint Ventures?

If you're forming, buying, or operating a "false" JV–a JV that is a JV in name only, but is in reality a naked competitor agreement–you could face substantial civil (or even potentially criminal) claims of a per se unlawful agreement.  Even if your JV is legitimate, you still may face potential liability for so-called "ancillary" restraints (those affecting activities outside the JV itself) imposed by or on the JV, or because the JV is "too big," or because it is structured improperly and has a tendency to facilitate price or other potentially problematic coordination between JV members.  In addition to (trebled) damages, you may be required to restructure, suspend, or in the worst case even dissolve your JV.  To avoid all these problems, it makes abundant sense to structure JVs properly in the first instance.

Why Does Antitrust Law Apply to Joint Ventures?

Generally speaking, antitrust law is intended to foster competition, which is thought to improve product quality while lowering product price. JVs are often procompetitive, but they can have anticompetitive effects.

On the procompetitive side of the balance sheet, JVs can create efficiencies and economies of scale, leading to lower costs, new or higher-quality products, and more rapid or higher levels of innovation. In addition, if a JV sets prices for its own products, doing so can eliminate free riding and improper information exchange with JV members.

On the anticompetitive side of the balance sheet, JV member firms might compete with each other–or at least compete more vigorously–absent the JV. In addition, an output JV can reduce competition in the market for the purchase of inputs used by the JV and its member firms.  Other types of JVs can have similar effects on ancillary or related markets.  Some JVs aren't real JVs at all but are "naked" competitor agreements masquerading as JVs, and thus squarely within the crosshairs of antitrust enforcement.  And JVs can impose ancillary restraints that restrict or harm competition, thus posing antitrust concerns.  For example, an agreement by JV members not to compete with the JV itself is an ancillary restraint.

However, to some extent we are putting the cart before the horse, because much of the above discussion assumes that an analysis and balancing of procompetitive benefits and anticompetitive effects is necessary. Sometimes it is, and sometimes it is not–as we shall explore in subsequent posts in this series.

What Are the Major Antitrust Questions Raised by JVs?

In general, antitrust analysis of a JV raises the following four sets of questions, the first of which inquires whether there is a legitimate JV, and the next three of which focus on whether the JV's procompetitive efficiencies outweigh its anticompetitive effects:

  • Does the JV constitute a "naked" agreement among competitors which is per se unlawful, does it not present an antitrust issue because there is only a single, integrated entity performing the JV functions, or does it involve restraints within the scope of a legitimate collaboration that are virtually per se lawful?
  • Does the JV impose so-called ancillary restraints on the venture itself or its members, and if so, what standard of review applies to such restraints?
  • Assuming the JV is properly structured to avoid an unlawful conspiracy charge, is it "too big" to be acceptable? What guidance applies to the size or market footprint of a JV?
  • Will operation of the JV involve sharing of information between or among competitors, and if so, what practical steps should be taken to manage and limit information sharing between and among the JV and JV members?

What Are the Sources of Guidance?

The guidance in this area is somewhat varied. It includes several prominent Supreme Court cases, a number of lower court cases and agency actions, and several agency guidelines.  Of the latter, the most notable are the Antitrust Guidelines for Collaboration Among Competitors ("Collaboration Guidelines"), which are now slightly long in the tooth (predating a few important Supreme Court cases concerning JVs) and somewhat general (some say too general to be very useful). Also potentially applicable are the federal enforcement agencies' Antitrust Guidelines for the Licensing of Intellectual Property ("IP Guidelines") and Statements of Antitrust Enforcement Policy in Health Care ("Healthcare Guidelines"), which discuss, inter alia, patent pools and physician/hospital networks and collaborations, respectively, but whose reasoning may be more broadly applicable.

What's Next?

Our series of forthcoming posts will discuss these major questions as well as other issues concerning JVs. Then we'll wrap-up with a checklist for thinking about JV issues.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

10 Oct 2018, Conference, Florida, United States
Julie Totten is Program Chair of this year’s conference, Lynne Hermle is speaking on women in the courtroom, boardroom, and c-suite, and Erin Connell is speaking on pay equity and pay transparency.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions