United States: Try-And-Try-Again Is A Recipe For Failure When Petitioning The Patent Trial And Appeal Board

Last Updated: December 21 2016
Article by David A. Klein

Whether an Inter Partes Review (IPR) will be instituted is at the discretion of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board ("the Board"). Usually when the Board declines a petition requesting an IPR, it is due to there being insufficient support for at least one challenged claim being unpatentable. Less developed are the Board's standards for declining petitions based on equity and fairness. One question has been how many bites-at-the-apple does a petitioner get when filing multiple petitions asking for review of a same patent claim.

The Board's November 28 decision in Alarm.Com Inc. v. Vivint, Inc. denying institution of an IPR attempts to provide practitioners some guidance. The Board assembles a list of eight factors they use in deciding whether to exercise their discretion. The factors are

  1. the finite resources of the Board,
  2. the need to issue a final determination within one year,
  3. whether the same petitioner has previously filed a petition for the same claim in the same patent,
  4. whether the petitioner should have known of the prior art they assert in their new petition when filing a prior petition,
  5. whether at the time of filing the petition, the petitioner already received the patent owner's preliminary response regarding a prior petition or received the Board's decision on whether to institute an IPR based on a prior petition,
  6. the time delay between when the petitioner learned about prior art cited in the petition and when they filed the petition,
  7. how persuasive a petitioner's excuse is for a time delay between filings when multiple petitions are directed to the same claim, and
  8. whether the petitioner's argument is rehashing prior art or arguments that the Office has seen before.

The list comes with the caveats that not all factors need to be present, that they need not give the factors equal weight, and an implication that additional factors might be added in the future.

The facts in Alarm.com are well-suited for use as a test case. In 2011, home automation and security services provider Vivint partnered with security system and home automation product maker Alarm.com. At some point, their relationship soured, and in 2015, Vivint filed a patent infringement suit against Alarm.com in Utah. The dispute escalated. By the time the panel picked up Alarm.com's petition requesting an IPR for eight claims in Vivint's U.S. Patent 6,462,654 B1 ('654 Patent), Alarm.com had filed 17 other petitions against patents owned by Vivint, including three directed to claims in the '654 patent.

The first of the three prior petitions was directed to the same claims in the '654 Patent as the petition under consideration, and cited one of the same prior art references. That petition was denied for failing to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success. The second and third petitions were directed to different claims than the petition under consideration, but asserted invalidity based in-part on the same two prior art references now relied upon. An IPR was granted for some of the claims in the second petition, and briefing by the parties was already complete. The Board had not yet made a decision on whether to institute an IPR based on the third petition.

The Board proceeded to check off factors one-and-two at a time. Immediately checked off was the third factor: There had been a prior petition for the same claims. Next checked off were the fourth and sixth factors: The two references now relied upon had been known to Alarm.com, with six months having passed from when The Board proceeded to check off factors one-and-two at a time. Immediately checked off was the third factor: There had been a prior petition for the same claims. Next checked off were the fourth and sixth factors: The two references now relied upon had been known to Alarm.com, with six months having passed from when Alarm.com first citing both references in a petition against the same patent and the filing of this petition. As for the fifth and seventh factors, Alarm.com had received Vivint's preliminary responses to the second petition directed to the same patent, and had received the Board's decision on whether to institute an IPR for the first and second petitions. Moreover, Alarm.com had received responses from Vivint and decisions in some of the 14 other petitions, and could provide no explanation as to why it could not have raised arguments against the current claims in a prior petition. Checking off the eighth factor, the Board explained that although Alarm.com swapped out one of the references from their previous petition targeting the same claims, they were essentially retreaded their same arguments.

The Board observed that Alarm.com waited until a week before a statutory bar to file their petition, inferring that Alarm. com was trying to gain as much information as they could from Vivint's responses and the Board's decisions before filing. In essence, the Board concluded that Alarm.com was gaming the system, engaging in "incremental petitioning" to fix deficiencies in earlier petitions. Concluding that  responses and the Board's decisions before filing. In essence, the Board concluded that Alarm.com was gaming the system, engaging in "incremental petitioning" to fix deficiencies in earlier petitions. Concluding that Alarm.com was wasting Office resources, and citing the potential for inequity, the Board checked off the first and second factors for good measure.

For those keeping score, that is eight-for-eight.

At this point, Alarm.com's only recourse is to request a rehearing within 30 days of the November 28 decision. As decided in June's unanimous Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee from the United States Supreme Court, a Board's decision not to institute an IPR proceeding is not appealable to the Federal Courts.


Do not take a scatter-shot approach to filing IPR petitions. Make every effort to be complete on the first try, even if it might seem beneficial to get a petition filed quickly. If a second petition becomes necessary against the same patent (and particularly the same claims), craft fresh arguments and try to avoid retreading references. PTAB is overloaded and has ample motivation to deny wash-rinse-and-repeat petitions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Jones Day
McDermott Will & Emery
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Jones Day
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions