Worldwide: Combatting Corruption Risk In The Asia Pacific Region: What Next?

Last Updated: December 29 2016
Article by Ben Allen and Michelle J. Shapiro

Introduction

The election of Donald Trump as the next US president has raised fundamental questions about the role of the United States going forward, and what implications this will have globally. This presents renewed challenges for Asia Pacific trade; particularly in light of uncertainty arising from increased protectionism as well as broader trade and currency risks for the region. This also has a unique impact for those companies reliant on global supply chains and regional subcontractors for manufacturing. Corruption as an impediment to business remains a theme for the region, and one that adds to the uncertainty.

The recent ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2017 conducted by AmCham Singapore and the US Chamber of Commerce allows some broad comparisons across the Asia Pacific region to be made. The tone of the (pre-election) survey is optimistic with 87 percent of companies saying that their level of trade and investment in the region will increase in the next five years. Troubling however is the fact that 62 percent say the need to combat corruption is a key priority area to enhance regional economic cooperation. In Australia, understanding corruption risks and consequences is still an area that needs work.

Corruption risks for businesses regionally

As this year’s corruption scandal in the oil and gas sector demonstrated, the issues are not new. Much has been written in recent years about the scope and costs of regulatory investigations and the powers of regulators, in Australia as well as in the UK and US. Bribery and corruption risk is becoming an increasing concern for businesses, and company executives and organisations operating in a range of sectors across the region are among those that have incurred the most significant penalties. How increased regional trade uncertainty affects those in Australia remains to be seen. More importantly for those Australian businesses reliant on regional supply chains, the weapons at the regulator’s disposal in the coming year will be critical to understand, as well knowing what more can be done locally to avoid corruption risks.

Corruption can take many forms. Not all companies bid on government contracts, being a major area of focus for regulators. Companies often underestimate the impact of private sector bribery, which remains a focus for not just Australia’s corruption regulator (the Australian Federal Police) but also its corporate regulator (ASIC). Nevertheless, the ASEAN Business Outlook Survey 2017 demonstrates that pressure for businesses to pay bribes for routine government services around the region remains a significant obstacle, especially when the alternative is to face costly delays within the supply chain.

While the problem potentially affects all businesses operating regionally, the impact on individual companies (and specific transactions) will vary according to the sector and location. Another major variable among organisations is that organisation’s culture, which will also be a factor considered when discussions commence with regulators investigating allegations of wrongdoing. How those discussions proceed, with new enforcement options at the regulators disposal, remains to be seen.

Deferred prosecution agreements in Australia?

In March 2016, the Australian Government released for public consultation its paper for improving enforcement options for serious corporate crime: Consideration of a Deferred Prosecution Agreements scheme in Australia. That paper outlined the Australian Government’s consideration of options to facilitate a more effective and efficient response to corporate crime through encouraging greater self-reporting by companies; the key plank of those options being a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) scheme. Utilised to great effect in the UK and US, the paper argued that an Australian DPA scheme for serious corporate crime may improve agencies’ ability to detect and pursue crimes committed by companies and help to compensate victims of corporate crime. That paper coincided with the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into foreign bribery and white collar crime, which is now scheduled to report on 30 June 2017, and which will likely include recommendations in relation to DPAs in Australia.

If adopted in Australia, DPAs would be a revolutionary tool for prosecutors addressing corruption issues. It had been thought that deferred prosecution agreements would not be appropriate within the Australian constitutional setting but a series of legislative amendments adopted in the UK could be mirrored in Australia negating that concern. However, risks will still remain for corporations once negotiations with prosecutors commence.

What can Australia learn from the US and UK schemes?

Deferred prosecution agreements were viewed as an attractive alternative to criminal prosecution in the US from around 1999. This grew largely from the need to find a mechanism to bring corporates to account for criminal violations without inflicting harm on innocent victims. These victims included workers left unemployed as a result of a company being found guilty of an economic crime, as well as affected investors and markets.

The US example of a DPA scheme, in operation for much longer than the UK scheme, has shown that deferred prosecution agreements have the capacity to both encourage and enforce cultural and behavioural change amongst corporations, while allowing internal redress in sufficient training and compliance. Negotiated agreements, as opposed to complex investigations and criminal proceedings, are more efficient, less costly and result in a more assured outcome for all parties in many cases. Financial penalties payable under a deferred prosecution agreement also allow both an accrual of government revenue as well as redress for wrongdoing and, in some cases, compensation for victims.

There remains a risk for corporations in entering into deferred prosecution agreement negotiations. There is no assurance that once negotiations are commenced an agreement will be formulated and prosecution deferred. As seen in the US and UK, evidence raised and admissions made by companies throughout negotiations can be used in any later prosecution if an agreement is unable to be reached. The prosecutor may also choose to withdraw unilaterally from negotiations and pursue criminal proceedings based on such information. It is likely that any Australian adoption of deferred prosecution agreements would include similar processes.

Nevertheless, history has also shown that corporations are incentivised by the prospect of entering into a deferred prosecution agreement and avoiding criminal prosecution. This is especially so given the reduction in legal uncertainty and costs, negative publicity and the ability to avoid criminal liability and associated consequences. In the US, companies are increasingly more likely to self-report, thereby improving enforcement rates and outcomes for serious economic crimes.

In Australia, adopting the improvements made to the deferred prosecution agreement framework by the UK legislature (by incorporating a judicial function and oversight) would make deferred prosecution agreements an effective option for authorities here in pursuit of corporate wrongdoers. The potential for alternative and individually negotiated outcomes, as well as heightened levels of voluntary reporting and compliance as provided by deferred prosecution agreements cannot be overlooked.

What more can businesses do to combat a “culture of corruption”?

In February 2016, the chairman of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), Wayne Byres, informed a Senate Estimates Committee hearing that APRA and the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) had each set up teams specifically to focus on “fixing corporate culture”. He went on to say that those teams would be sharing information about organisations, but acknowledged that “you can’t just regulate [appropriate culture] into existence”. Mr Byres saw leadership from executives as the key plank to improving behaviour within organisations. The difficulty for organisations is identifying “appropriate culture” and, perhaps more importantly, knowing how to fix “bad culture”. Striking the right culture balance will be key to ensuring that regulatory compliance is adhered to and also key to minimising fraud and corruption risks.

Attributing liability to an organisation for a breach of Australia’s Commonwealth anti-bribery legislation requires that organisation to have expressly, tacitly or impliedly authorised or permitted the commission of the relevant offence. In practice, the means by which such authorisation or permission is established includes proving that a corporate culture existed that directed, encouraged, tolerated or led to non-compliance or that the organisation failed to create and maintain a corporate culture that required compliance. Similarly, for those facing investigations of fraud or wrongdoing by other regulators (such as ASIC’s recently proposed action against those financial institutions allegedly engaged in the rigging of Australia’s bank bill swap rate, or BBSW), demonstrating that wrongdoing was the work of individual “bad apples” and not the barrel in which they were stored may prove critical. Establishing a culture of compliance to the satisfaction of regulators may help an organisation escape from liability, but begs the question: what is required to create “good culture”?

How do you create “good culture”?

In Australia, certainly in the context of anti-corruption regulation, there is very little guidance about what constitutes a compliant “corporate culture”. This is in stark contrast to the United States and the United Kingdom, where comprehensive guidance is offered to organisations across a range of white collar crime offences, including bribery and corruption. In the absence of clear guidance in Australia, organisations might look to generally recognised compliance standards to assist in understanding an approach to creating good culture.

To embed a true culture of compliance, a focus on more than just leadership (or “tone at the top”) is required. It must extend to things such as appropriate hiring (and increased vetting procedures for staff), proper incentives tied to long term performance of the organisation, adequate internal controls (such as dual authorisations, segregation of duties and suitable reporting structures), efficient internal audits (including use of data analytics), budget support for internal audit and compliance functions, promotion of an open communication channel throughout the organisation (including a robust whistleblower regime), competent and empowered compliance personnel as well as appropriate and tailored training for all staff. Focussing only on the “bad apples” within an organisation ignores the bigger issues: a true culture of compliance requires weeding out the structures, processes and social systems of organisations that lead to opportunities for wrongdoing to occur.

Where to from here?

Australia has already been criticised by the lack of anti-corruption proceedings under the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention, enacted in 1999. This dearth of enforcement more probably signifies inadequate strategies for prosecution and a lack of incentives for voluntary reporting than it does the absence of fraudulent or corrupt practices among Australian and foreign companies. The recent scandal involving Unaoil may change that landscape. Against this backdrop, it is clear that new strategies to address corporate wrongdoing, fraud and corruption would assist Australian authorities and enforcement bodies in their endeavours. A new weapon in the arsenal such as deferred prosecution agreements may be the next logical step to take up the fight against serious economic crime. In addition, being ready to respond to an allegation and demonstrate “good culture” will be critical. Conversations with risk and compliance officers and those with governance oversight need to start now as such areas are increasingly in the spotlight when it comes to how organisations manage their affairs, particularly in relation to their compliance obligations and what will be seen as “good culture” when it comes to avoiding corruption.

Dentons is the world's first polycentric global law firm. A top 20 firm on the Acritas 2015 Global Elite Brand Index, the Firm is committed to challenging the status quo in delivering consistent and uncompromising quality and value in new and inventive ways. Driven to provide clients a competitive edge, and connected to the communities where its clients want to do business, Dentons knows that understanding local cultures is crucial to successfully completing a deal, resolving a dispute or solving a business challenge. Now the world's largest law firm, Dentons' global team builds agile, tailored solutions to meet the local, national and global needs of private and public clients of any size in more than 125 locations serving 50-plus countries. www.dentons.com.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Dentons is delighted to support a global IT services and consulting firm Miratech as an event host partner at their annual conference called M-Force18 New York on September 27th. The event will be held at Dentons New York office in the heart of Midtown Manhattan, opposite Rockefeller Center.

2 Oct 2018, Seminar, Dallas, United States

We are pleased to offer a program of five sessions designed specifically for in-house counsel. Topics will include:

  • In-house corporate ethical issues
  • What recent Supreme Court decisions mean for business
  • Keeping lawyers out of your benefit plans
  • Litigation tactics for in-house counsel
  • Employment issues in the age of #MeToo
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions