United States: A Closer Look At Rigsby And The Supreme Court's Rejection Of Mandatory Dismissal For Seal Violations

In light of the rising civil monetary penalties under the False Claims Act (FCA) and the looming threat of bank-breaking treble damages, avenues to dismissal are paramount to defendants operating in industries vulnerable to FCA claims, including health care. The United States Supreme Court's unanimous decision in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States ex rel. Rigsby, issued on December 6, 2016, narrows the path for one such avenue.

In Rigsby, the Supreme Court closed the door on what would have been a powerful tool for defendants facing qui tam complaints brought under the FCA: mandatory dismissal based on a relator's violation of the 60-day seal requirement. The Court did not, however, foreclose dismissal as a possible sanction against relators who violate the seal‑requirements.

Under the FCA, qui tam complaints "shall be filed in camera, shall remain under seal for at least 60 days, and shall not be served on the defendant until the court so orders." 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2). This 60­‑day period—which is often extended for good cause, on the government's motion, for periods of months or even years—is designed to give the government sufficient time to investigate the relator's allegations and determine whether to intervene in the suit. While the complaint remains under seal, the government reviews the evidence in the relator's disclosure statement, subpoenas records and witnesses, and consults with experts. At the conclusion of its investigation, and armed with enhanced information about the strength (or weakness) of the relator's allegations, the government has several options—it can pursue a settlement, intervene in one or more counts of the complaint, decline to intervene, or move to dismiss the relator's complaint. If the government intervenes, it will often file its own complaint separate from the relator's and may pursue alternative arguments and legal theories, including claims under the Anti-Kickback statute.

In Rigsby, defendant State Farm argued that the relators' violation of the FCA's seal requirement mandated dismissal of their complaint. This argument, originally raised in a motion to dismiss almost five years after the complaint was filed and more than three years after the district court lifted the seal in full, arose from two disclosures by relators. First, relator's counsel disclosed a sealed evidentiary filing to three news outlets: ABC, the Associated Press, and the New York Times. This disclosure resulted in the publication of multiple news stories discussing relators' fraud allegations, though none of these stories specifically referenced the pending FCA complaint. Second, relators met with a member of Congress who subsequently spoke out against the defendant's alleged fraud without citing the existence of an FCA action. Following the disclosing attorney's indictment for bribery and the removal of his colleagues from relators' case, the defendant moved to dismiss the qui tam complaint on the grounds that the relators violated the seal requirement.

In determining whether dismissal was warranted, the district court balanced the three factors articulated in the Ninth Circuit decision, United States ex rel. Lujan v. Hughes Aircraft Co.: (1) the actual harm to the government resulting from the premature disclosure; (2) the nature and severity of the violation; and (3) the evidence of bad faith. Concluding that these factors weighed against dismissal, the district court denied the motion and the case proceeded to a bellwether trial.

At trial, the relators prevailed. The Fifth Circuit affirmed on appeal. Holding that a seal violation does not automatically mandate dismissal of a qui tam complaint, and applying the three factors articulated in Lujan and relied on by the district court, the court determined that the circumstances underlying the relators' seal violation did not require dismissal.

In an opinion authored by Justice Kennedy, the Supreme Court affirmed. The seal requirement is "a mandatory rule the relator must follow," the Court opined. The FCA "says nothing, however, about the remedy for a violation of that rule." Looking to the structure of the FCA, including the statute's provisions mandating dismissal (based on lack of jurisdiction) for certain claims brought against service persons or members of Congress, see 31 U.S.C. § 3730(e)(1)–(2), the Court concluded that "had Congress intended to require dismissal for a violation of the seal requirement, it would have said so." Rather than mandate dismissal for a violation of the seal requirement, the FCA is silent about possible remedies.

Because the seal requirement is designed to protect the government's interests by concealing the nature and scope of the relator's allegations until the government has sufficient time to investigate, the Court opined, "it would make little sense to adopt a rigid interpretation of the seal provision that prejudices the Government by depriving it of needed assistance from private parties." The government agreed with this conclusion, asserting that a mandatory dismissal rule would harm its interests and thereby undermine the seal requirement's purpose.

The Supreme Court also rejected the defendant's argument that the district court failed to consider potential harm to the defendant as a factor in assessing the justification of a sanction. While the Court left open the question of which factors lower courts may consider in determining whether dismissal is warranted, it held that the district court did not abuse its discretion by relying on the test articulated in Lujan in denying the defendant's motion to dismiss.

In its petition for certiorari, previously discussed here, the defendant argued that by violating the seal requirement, relators sought to "fuel a media campaign designed to demonize and put pressure on [defendant] to settle." And the parties in Rigsby agreed that the disclosure by relators' attorney issue did in fact violate the seal requirement. The weight of the Supreme Court's opinion, however, rested on the analysis of potential harm to the government's ability to investigate and assess defendants' FCA exposure.

While the Rigsby decision reinforces the assumption that the sanction of dismissal of the complaint requires a high bar of justification, the Supreme Court noted that other, lesser sanctions can be considered in cases where the relator violates the seal. District courts "have inherent power. . . to impose sanctions short of dismissal for violations of court orders," the Court observed, including "monetary penalties or attorney discipline."

Before the district court, the defendant in Rigsby failed to seek any relief other than dismissal in response to the relators' seal violation. However, the Supreme Court's opinion makes clear that defendants have several tools available to them to discourage and penalize relators' efforts to extract settlements through premature disclosures. On the one hand, monetary penalties or attorney discipline may be appropriate in those cases in which the seal violation is not particularly severe (because the relator initially complied with § 3730(b)(2)'s requirements) or there is little or no evidence of bad faith. On the other hand, defendants can still seek dismissal where there is a colorable argument that the government was harmed by the disclosure, e.g., because the disclosure publicized the pendency of the FCA suit before the seal was lifted. The Rigsby Court did not attempt to minimize the seriousness of violations of the seal by relators, but rather signaled that the remedy of dismissal should not be expected under circumstances that could undermine the United States' ability to pursue, in good faith, FCA claims against defendants.

A Closer Look at Rigsby and the Supreme Court's Rejection of Mandatory Dismissal for Seal Violations

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions