European Union: Implications For Bank Creditors: The Latest EU Banking Reform Proposals

The European Commission recently announced an extensive package of banking reform proposals. Of particular interest to bank creditors, proposed amendments to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive aim to amend the creditor hierarchy in European bank resolution and insolvency proceedings. The Commission is also proposing changes to the onerous requirement that banks procure third party agreements to the recognition of bail-in for contracts governed by the laws of a third country. The timing of these proposals is significant because in both areas national rulemakers in different EU Member States are currently implementing, or planning to implement, differing requirements. This note discusses the Commission's proposals in the context of the bail-in tool with a particular focus on the implications for creditors.


On 23 November 2016, the European Commission published legislative proposals outlining far-reaching amendments to the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive ("BRRD")1 and other key pieces of EU banking legislation.2 Under the BRRD, resolution authorities have the power, among other things, to write down or convert into equity certain debt liabilities of an EU firm in resolution ("Bail-In").

Bail-In Clauses

Bail-In is one of the resolution measures available to EU resolution authorities which is given cross-border recognition throughout the EU. This means that any Bail-In with regard to contracts governed by the laws of an EU Member State should be construed as a valid administrative act under the governing law of the contract. We would not expect Bail-In measures to exclude liabilities under contracts which are governed by the laws of a third-country (i.e., non-EU law governed contracts). However, due to concerns as to the effectiveness of a Bail-In under the governing law of the contract, there is a requirement in BRRD to procure contractual agreement to Bail-In under such contracts. Without such language, under a contract governed by New York law for instance, a creditor might argue in the US courts that a write-down or conversion into equity was not valid to modify the parties' obligations under the contract and that the EU firm is in default of a payment obligation, notwithstanding the resolution action.

BRRD requires EU firms to include in their non-EU law governed contracts a clause by which "a creditor or party to the agreement" recognises and agrees that liabilities may become subject to Bail-In (the "Bail-in Clause"). As currently drafted, the scope of the Bail-in Clause requirement is very broad. Beyond certain limited exceptions, it appears to be triggered by any type of liability regardless of the circumstances.3

Sequence of Bail-In

When applying the Bail-In tool under BRRD, resolution authorities must respect the following order of loss- absorbency in terms of creditor hierarchy (from last to first): regulatory capital (namely Common Equity Tier 1, then Additional Tier 1 and Tier 2), other subordinated debt and, last, senior debt. Within the categories of non- regulatory required subordinated debt and senior debt, any Bail-In must follow the hierarchy of claims in normal insolvency proceedings as stipulated in the relevant national insolvency law. One exception to this principle applies for deposit-takers: protected (typically consumer) deposits are outside the scope of the Bail-In tool. BRRD also requires EU Member States to ensure that any deposits of natural persons and SMEs that are not covered by depositor protection rank higher than other (non-preferred) senior debt.

Loss-Absorbing Capital

To ensure that EU firms have at all times sufficient liabilities that are eligible for a Bail-In, BRRD introduced a minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities ("MREL"). Resolution authorities must set an individual MREL for each EU firm which will depend on, amongst other things, their resolution strategy. MREL serves a similar purpose to the total loss absorbing capital ("TLAC") standard established by the Financial Stability Board for global systemically important banks ("G-SIBs"), but the two concepts differ in a number of details, particularly the subordination criterion.4

BRRD does not include a formal requirement for subordination but resolution authorities may require a specific EU firm's MREL (or part thereof) to be met with subordinated instruments. By contrast, subject to certain exemptions, the TLAC standard includes a subordination requirement.

Diverging Approaches of EU Member States to the Ranking of Senior Unsecured Bonds

EU Member States have taken very different approaches to help local banks comply with the subordination requirement of the TLAC standard and the broader MREL requirements. The UK favours a structural subordination approach under which major banks issue senior unsecured bonds from holding companies that do not have operational liabilities. This approach ensures that liabilities of operational entities are not impacted by any Bail-In at the level of the non-operating holding company. However, many of the largest continental banks have an operating top-level entity. Bailing-in senior unsecured bonds which have the same rank as large deposits, liabilities arising from derivative contracts and other operational liabilities may entail significant legal risks and render a Bail-In less effective. To address this, some EU Member States have favoured an approach based on either contractual or statutory subordination. The latter is the current German and Italian approach, whereas France and Spain plan to follow an approach based on contractual subordination.

New Non-Preferred Senior Debt Instruments

To address the legal patchwork arising from diverging national approaches, the Commission is proposing to harmonize legislation in this area by introducing a separate tier within the category of senior debt. The new non- preferred senior debt instruments would rank junior to all other senior liabilities but would be senior to the subordinated debt. Much like the French approach, the Commission proposes that these instruments, when issued, must explicitly refer to the 'non-preferred' ranking in their terms and conditions. The status as non- preferred senior debt would mean that, in case of a Bail-In that breaks within the senior debt, losses could be allocated to the holders of such instruments ahead of the creditors of other senior liabilities. Through the establishment of a statutory basis for the issuance of non-preferred senior debt instruments, combined with explicit contractual subordination arrangements, legal certainty around the ability of resolution authorities to resolve failing EU firms is expected to increase significantly. The proposed harmonised approach should also help the holders of ordinary senior unsecured bonds (i.e., those issued without reference to the new regime) and the creditors of other senior liabilities (such as large deposits, liabilities arising from derivatives contracts and other operational liabilities) with the assessment of their Bail-In risk. From their perspective, a new layer of non-preferred senior debt would function as an extra safety cushion, making it less likely that they get bailed-in themselves.


These proposed amendments are intended to be transposed throughout the EU by June 2017 and to apply from July 2017. However, the ultimate timing will depend on how long the EU legislative process takes. Unlike under the German approach, the Commission does not intend to apply the provisions retroactively, which means that any instruments issued before the date of application of the revised BRRD provisions would remain subject to national insolvency regimes. To the extent that any of the existing national approaches adopted by EU Member States conflict with the final text, they will need to amended or adjusted accordingly.

New Waiver to Bail-In Clause Requirement

The Commission is also proposing a new right of resolution authorities to waive the Bail-In Clause requirement under certain circumstances.5

The intention is to remove the practical and legal issues that EU firms and, in particular, those operating branches in third countries, have faced in complying with the Bail-In Clause requirement, and will help them avoid having to discontinue business lines. Some third-country counterparties have persistently declined to include the Bail-In Clause in contracts with EU firms. In other instances, third- country regulators have even prohibited agreement to such clauses. Due to the many difficulties faced by EU firms in complying with the Bail-In Clause requirement, the banking industry has lobbied for a more flexible implementation and enforcement approach. This has led some of the EU national regulators, in particular those in the UK and Germany, to give guidance on their supervisory practice to mitigate some of the challenges. For example, UK firms may decline to include a Bail-In term for unsecured liabilities which are not debt instruments where it would be "impracticable" to do so.6

The UK Prudential Regulation Authority ("PRA") has provided some examples of where firms might assess that their compliance is impracticable, such as where it would be illegal to include the language in a contract governed by a particular country's laws or where the liability is contingent on a breach of the relevant contract. However, the PRA will not allow the rule to be used where a bail-in clause is merely inconvenient or leads to loss of competitiveness or profitability. In light of diverging approaches at national level and the limited leeway in BRRD, amendments to the text of BRRD itself will be broadly welcomed. Building on the UK approach, the Commission proposes to give resolution authorities discretion to grant a waiver from compliance with the Bail-In Clause requirement where:

  • it is determined that it would be "legally, contractually or economically impracticable" for a EU firm to include a Bail-In Clause;
  • the waiver would not impede the resolvability of the EU firm; and
  • the liabilities or instrument can be subject to the Bail-In powers of an EU resolution authority according to the laws of the relevant third country.

The European Banking Authority ("EBA") would be charged with preparing draft technical standards on the conditions under which it would be legally, contractually or economically impracticable for an EU firm to include a Bail-In Clause in certain liabilities and the conditions under which a waiver would not impede the resolvability of an EU firm. The waiver would only be available for liabilities that are not unsecured debt instruments, Additional Tier 1 instruments or Tier 2 instruments and for liabilities that would be senior to any MREL liabilities. If a waiver is granted, the liabilities would not count towards the EU firm's MREL. If the Commission's amendments go ahead as currently drafted, a waiver could only be given if all three of the conditions are met. This may be difficult to achieve and, with regard to the third condition, also depend on the analysis of the relevant third-country law. With regard to the details, much will depend on the EBA's technical standards. The Commission intends the revisions to be transposed by EU Member States within 12 months after the date of entry into force of the revised BRRD and to apply within six months after that transposition date. Those national regulators that have already adopted supervisory practices, such as the UK's PRA, will need to assess whether the final text will require an alteration to their existing practices.


1  The Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/EU.

2  The proposals also covered the Capital Requirements Regulation 575/2013 (CRR) and Capital Requirements Directive 2013/36/EU (CRD IV). The changes to the BRRD are mirrored in the Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation 809/2014. The proposals amending CRD IV are available here and the proposals amending CRR are available here. Those amending the BRRD on ranking of unsecured debt instruments in the insolvency hierarchy are available here and on loss-absorbing and recapitalisation capacity of credit institutions and investment firms here. The proposals amending Single Resolution Mechanism Regulation are available here.

3   Further detail on the scope of the Bail-In Clause requirements is available in our client note, "BRRD: Contractual Recognition of Bail-in and Resolution Stays," available here.

4  The European Commission's proposals to amend the BRRD and CRR include proposals to amend the EU MREL to introduce the TLAC standards for EU G-SIBs. Those proposals are not discussed in this note. The Commission suggests that, in light of the similar purpose of MREL and TLAC, an integrated approach is best so as to avoid undue complexity.

5  The bail-in tool is a separate resolution mechanism to that of the resolution stay. You may like to view our client note, BRRD: Contractual Recognition of Bail-in and Resolution Stays, available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.