United States: Reflections On The Next Four Years Of Antitrust Enforcement

1. By the votes of a nation's electors, the future of U.S. antitrust enforcement moved from "pragmatic aggressive enforcement as usual" to "too early to call." The unexpected election of President-elect Donald J. Trump opened wide the speculation or mystery of what he and his advisors are planning as his administration's antitrust policy. Given the paucity of his statements on antitrust policy, and the random nature of his few comments, we must dig deeply to formulate the outline of his enforcement plans or speculate about practices and policies in the spirit of the campaign's "America First" rhetoric. At this moment, there is little evidence of which way it will go— hence, "too early to call." Secretary Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, had a detailed policy statement on antitrust enforcement. In addition, the very substantial majority of articles and reports published in recent weeks discussed Secretary Clinton's very focused and well-prepared views in detail. In the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that this "reflection" was initially drafted to analyze Secretary Clinton's policies—at least until 11:00 PM on November 8, 2016. I know I was not alone!

2. Even when everyone was focusing most of their attention on Secretary Clinton's detailed enforcement plan, there were three issues that developed from President-elect Trump's brief excursions into antitrust enforcement or from significant campaign themes that are at the center of our analysis and reflection.

3. First, the announcement of the AT&T/Time Warner deal and the reaction of Mr. Trump shone a bright light on the likely magnitude and shape of President-elect Trump's antitrust enforcement policy themes. Importantly, we must determine if Mr. Trump's reaction to the AT&T/Time Warner matter brings about a return to the populist political consideration (as opposed to a strictly economic analysis) in antitrust enforcement. I suspect that is a position that would horrify the conservative lawyers and economists who will assist President-elect Trump in forming his government.

4. Second, it is what Mr. Trump did not say in his AT&T/ Time Warner statement that is the central focus of antitrust enforcement -- that the courts, not the executive departments or the administrative agencies, make the final decision. The importance of the courts in giving the parties a fair and impartial hearing and making a sound, precedent-based decision is the centerpiece of our antitrust jurisprudence.

5. Third, in light of considerable concern about living and working globally in trade deals and military alliances, how will President-elect Trump and his Administration deal with international cooperation, comity and coordination in the antitrust world?

I. "The concentration of power in the hands of too few"

6. The most significant and strongest statement of antitrust policy that Mr. Trump delivered during the campaign related to his opposition to the AT&T/Time Warner transaction, announced in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania in October. At a campaign rally, Mr. Trump concluded that "[a]s an example of the power structure I'm fighting, AT&T is buying Time Warner and thus CNN, a deal we will not approve in my administration because it's too much concentration of power in the hands of too few." He went on later to attack the Obama Administration's approval of the Comcast/NBC Universal deal in 2011 by making the same argument: it "concentrates far too much power in one massive entity that is telling the voters what to think and what to do. Deals like this destroy democracy." He suggested that he might reopen that matter: "we'll look at breaking that deal up and other deals like that." While the crowd cheered and journalists filled their notebooks, the statement has become the subject of great debate in the antitrust world. The President- elect's economic advisor also released a "statement on monopoly power of new media conglomerates." Investigating the monopoly power of "conglomerates" takes us back to the case law of the 1960s.

7. Thus, Mr. Trump's statements received—and are still receiving—great scrutiny as Mr. Trump became President- elect. Mr. Trump's statements recalled a time when the drafters and enforcers of the antitrust laws believed that enforcement actions challenging mergers and monopolization cases were not only subject to economic analysis and scrutiny, but also looked at the political aspect of antitrust. This is very similar to the populist sentiments that Mr. Trump expressed in his campaign speech—there is too much concentration of power in the hands of too few. Obviously, the fact that these are powerful media companies is an important element in the discussion. Much of the case law through the early 1970s took seriously the political values of antitrust, while also considering the economic impact of the transaction.

8. The best scholarship on the importance of alleging the political issue of limiting political power of corporate combinations is a seminal article by then Professor, and later FTC Chairman, Robert Pitofsky. His classic article, "The Political Context of Antitrust" appeared at 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1051 (1979). Professor Pitofsky boldly—even defiantly—takes on whether antitrust law should be based purely on economic analysis, or whether there is a political context as well. The short summary of the political element relates to the concentration of power in the hands of a few. From Senator John Sherman to President Theodore Roosevelt and President (and later Chief Justice) William Howard Taft, the justification of the antitrust laws was both political and economic. The words of Professor Pitofsky's formulation are virtually identical to the words Mr. Trump uttered on the campaign trail.

9. Professor Pitofsky criticizes antitrust economists and lawyers for "persuading the courts to adopt an exclusively economic approach to antitrust questions." He argues that "[i]t is bad history, bad policy and bad law" "to exclude certain political values in interpreting the antitrust laws." Professor Pitofsky carefully defines what he means by "political values"—a fear of excessive concentration of economic power in a few hands, and, most importantly, "if the free market is allowed to develop under antitrust rules that are blind to all but economic concerns, the likely result will be an economy so dominated by a few corporate giants that it will be impossible for the state not to play a more intrusive role in economic affairs." It is ironic that Mr. Trump's found his voice in raising concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of the few -- in media companies and throughout the economy.

10. It will be interesting to see, in the coming weeks, whether President-elect Trump maintains and further articulates this populist view or embraces the usual economics only policy. This issue will bring about some interesting discussions at Trump Tower, the White House, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. I'm certain that the many lawyers and economists will advise Mr. Trump on their perspective on economic policy. The question remains: what will the President-elect say? What will be do? What is the Trump policy?

II. A government of laws, not men

11. In his statement regarding AT&T/Time Warner, Mr. Trump stated directly that this is "a deal we will not approve in my administration." The ultimate decision on whether the transaction is approved or the practice is determined to be legal under the antitrust laws is not in the hands of President-elect Trump, or his assistant attorney general for Antitrust, or his FTC chairman—it is in the hands of an Article 3 federal district judge, and, as may be required, court of appeals judges and Supreme Court justices.

12. The Antitrust Division may file charges to stop a transaction or end an illegal practice, but it must present its case to a federal judge at trial. The Federal Trade Commission is an administrative agency that has the power to make an initial ruling in some cases, but its ruling will be reviewed by a federal appeals court panel, and, in the case of a merger challenge, the Commission must also bring its case to a federal district judge who has the power to issue an injunction to prohibit the transaction from moving forward. While the enforcement agencies have great power to bring cases and close cases and to do their best to shape the law, they are not the decision makers on challenges to deals or challenges to conduct: the courts are. We, as counsel for potential defendants, must, on occasion, gently remind our enforcer friends of this fundamental principle as well.

13. Our court-based system is completely different than the systems of many nations around the world where the administrative agency is empowered to judge the case, determine the outcome, set all of the terms and assess fines and penalties, although there may be some level of judicial review in certain cases. The fundamental difference is that many non-U.S. enforcement agencies are regulatory and the governments have enormous power to shape the national economy. Conversely, U.S. antitrust policy promotes the free market and combats those things that harm the free market. It is—and will remain— the courts that decide antitrust cases after hearing the evidence of the enforcers and defense counsel. When everyone is heard and has the opportunity to present evidence, the legitimacy of the system is assured. It is the independence of the judiciary and the guarantee of due process of law that make our system so much better than many around the world.

III. The promise of future international antitrust enforcement: Cooperation and Coordination

14. A major theme of the 2016 campaign revolved around international trade agreements and defense alliances and the heightened concern that they were no longer of value or no longer a cost effective investment for the U.S. Although not specifically articulated or identified, the antitrust enforcement world has an enormous body of treaties, allowing for coordination and information exchange between and among nations, including collaboration and coordination in investigations. In recent times, such agreements were entered with Japan, India and China, among others.

15. Even more important than the bilateral agreements, however, was the formation of the International Competition Network (ICN). The ICN grew out of a recommendation of the International Competition Policy Advisory Committee (ICPAC), a group organized by Attorney General Janet Reno and Assistant Attorney General Joel Klein to evaluate the problems of economic globalization, particularly multi-jurisdictional mergers and international cartels. Out of that idea, a new organization was formed to enhance cooperation and coordination among antitrust enforcers. The Network was launched on October 25, 2001, with 14 jurisdictions represented. Over its 15-year life, the ICN has grown to 120 jurisdictions.

16. Unlike trade agreements and military alliances, the ICN is not a place where jobs could be lost or weapon systems or U.S. troops could be sent to help allies. It is not, and cannot be, a decision-making entity like the World Trade Organization. The ICN brings together enforcers on a regular basis to establish best practices, to discuss cooperation and coordination and educate its members, especially from the developing world. It is an institution that the new Administration should embrace and nurture. For 15 years it has enhanced and developed antitrust globally. The importance of an organization where all its members learn from each other and cooperate with each other on the enforcement field will serve U,S, enforcement policy for decades to come.

IV. Conclusion

17. We certainly live In interesting times. After a chaotic campaign and a very, very surprising result, it is time to govern. The Sherman Act has served the country well for 126 years, protecting free enterprise and punishing those who broke the rules. In the end, it is the skill and dedication of the men and women of the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission that will make the difference. Those men and women need strong and able leadership to make that difference.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
24 Oct 2017, Seminar, Los Angeles, United States

Presented by The American Bar Association White Collar Crime Committee.

24 Oct 2017, Conference, Los Angeles, United States

Corporate transactions are not just in the domain of M&A corporate attorneys. This program will cover the important role of employment and benefits counsel in shaping mergers and acquisitions. The presenters will provide practical guidance on conducting due diligence of labor, employment, employee benefits and executive compensation arrangements of target companies.

25 Oct 2017, Business Breakfast, New York, United States

Please join us for a complimentary breakfast program and networking with private equity investment banking professionals to discuss private equity activity and prospective deal flow opportunities in the technology industry.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.