United States: Reflections On The Next Four Years Of Antitrust Enforcement

1. By the votes of a nation's electors, the future of U.S. antitrust enforcement moved from "pragmatic aggressive enforcement as usual" to "too early to call." The unexpected election of President-elect Donald J. Trump opened wide the speculation or mystery of what he and his advisors are planning as his administration's antitrust policy. Given the paucity of his statements on antitrust policy, and the random nature of his few comments, we must dig deeply to formulate the outline of his enforcement plans or speculate about practices and policies in the spirit of the campaign's "America First" rhetoric. At this moment, there is little evidence of which way it will go— hence, "too early to call." Secretary Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, had a detailed policy statement on antitrust enforcement. In addition, the very substantial majority of articles and reports published in recent weeks discussed Secretary Clinton's very focused and well-prepared views in detail. In the interest of full disclosure, I must admit that this "reflection" was initially drafted to analyze Secretary Clinton's policies—at least until 11:00 PM on November 8, 2016. I know I was not alone!

2. Even when everyone was focusing most of their attention on Secretary Clinton's detailed enforcement plan, there were three issues that developed from President-elect Trump's brief excursions into antitrust enforcement or from significant campaign themes that are at the center of our analysis and reflection.

3. First, the announcement of the AT&T/Time Warner deal and the reaction of Mr. Trump shone a bright light on the likely magnitude and shape of President-elect Trump's antitrust enforcement policy themes. Importantly, we must determine if Mr. Trump's reaction to the AT&T/Time Warner matter brings about a return to the populist political consideration (as opposed to a strictly economic analysis) in antitrust enforcement. I suspect that is a position that would horrify the conservative lawyers and economists who will assist President-elect Trump in forming his government.

4. Second, it is what Mr. Trump did not say in his AT&T/ Time Warner statement that is the central focus of antitrust enforcement -- that the courts, not the executive departments or the administrative agencies, make the final decision. The importance of the courts in giving the parties a fair and impartial hearing and making a sound, precedent-based decision is the centerpiece of our antitrust jurisprudence.

5. Third, in light of considerable concern about living and working globally in trade deals and military alliances, how will President-elect Trump and his Administration deal with international cooperation, comity and coordination in the antitrust world?

I. "The concentration of power in the hands of too few"

6. The most significant and strongest statement of antitrust policy that Mr. Trump delivered during the campaign related to his opposition to the AT&T/Time Warner transaction, announced in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania in October. At a campaign rally, Mr. Trump concluded that "[a]s an example of the power structure I'm fighting, AT&T is buying Time Warner and thus CNN, a deal we will not approve in my administration because it's too much concentration of power in the hands of too few." He went on later to attack the Obama Administration's approval of the Comcast/NBC Universal deal in 2011 by making the same argument: it "concentrates far too much power in one massive entity that is telling the voters what to think and what to do. Deals like this destroy democracy." He suggested that he might reopen that matter: "we'll look at breaking that deal up and other deals like that." While the crowd cheered and journalists filled their notebooks, the statement has become the subject of great debate in the antitrust world. The President- elect's economic advisor also released a "statement on monopoly power of new media conglomerates." Investigating the monopoly power of "conglomerates" takes us back to the case law of the 1960s.

7. Thus, Mr. Trump's statements received—and are still receiving—great scrutiny as Mr. Trump became President- elect. Mr. Trump's statements recalled a time when the drafters and enforcers of the antitrust laws believed that enforcement actions challenging mergers and monopolization cases were not only subject to economic analysis and scrutiny, but also looked at the political aspect of antitrust. This is very similar to the populist sentiments that Mr. Trump expressed in his campaign speech—there is too much concentration of power in the hands of too few. Obviously, the fact that these are powerful media companies is an important element in the discussion. Much of the case law through the early 1970s took seriously the political values of antitrust, while also considering the economic impact of the transaction.

8. The best scholarship on the importance of alleging the political issue of limiting political power of corporate combinations is a seminal article by then Professor, and later FTC Chairman, Robert Pitofsky. His classic article, "The Political Context of Antitrust" appeared at 127 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 1051 (1979). Professor Pitofsky boldly—even defiantly—takes on whether antitrust law should be based purely on economic analysis, or whether there is a political context as well. The short summary of the political element relates to the concentration of power in the hands of a few. From Senator John Sherman to President Theodore Roosevelt and President (and later Chief Justice) William Howard Taft, the justification of the antitrust laws was both political and economic. The words of Professor Pitofsky's formulation are virtually identical to the words Mr. Trump uttered on the campaign trail.

9. Professor Pitofsky criticizes antitrust economists and lawyers for "persuading the courts to adopt an exclusively economic approach to antitrust questions." He argues that "[i]t is bad history, bad policy and bad law" "to exclude certain political values in interpreting the antitrust laws." Professor Pitofsky carefully defines what he means by "political values"—a fear of excessive concentration of economic power in a few hands, and, most importantly, "if the free market is allowed to develop under antitrust rules that are blind to all but economic concerns, the likely result will be an economy so dominated by a few corporate giants that it will be impossible for the state not to play a more intrusive role in economic affairs." It is ironic that Mr. Trump's found his voice in raising concerns about the concentration of power in the hands of the few -- in media companies and throughout the economy.

10. It will be interesting to see, in the coming weeks, whether President-elect Trump maintains and further articulates this populist view or embraces the usual economics only policy. This issue will bring about some interesting discussions at Trump Tower, the White House, the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. I'm certain that the many lawyers and economists will advise Mr. Trump on their perspective on economic policy. The question remains: what will the President-elect say? What will be do? What is the Trump policy?

II. A government of laws, not men

11. In his statement regarding AT&T/Time Warner, Mr. Trump stated directly that this is "a deal we will not approve in my administration." The ultimate decision on whether the transaction is approved or the practice is determined to be legal under the antitrust laws is not in the hands of President-elect Trump, or his assistant attorney general for Antitrust, or his FTC chairman—it is in the hands of an Article 3 federal district judge, and, as may be required, court of appeals judges and Supreme Court justices.

12. The Antitrust Division may file charges to stop a transaction or end an illegal practice, but it must present its case to a federal judge at trial. The Federal Trade Commission is an administrative agency that has the power to make an initial ruling in some cases, but its ruling will be reviewed by a federal appeals court panel, and, in the case of a merger challenge, the Commission must also bring its case to a federal district judge who has the power to issue an injunction to prohibit the transaction from moving forward. While the enforcement agencies have great power to bring cases and close cases and to do their best to shape the law, they are not the decision makers on challenges to deals or challenges to conduct: the courts are. We, as counsel for potential defendants, must, on occasion, gently remind our enforcer friends of this fundamental principle as well.

13. Our court-based system is completely different than the systems of many nations around the world where the administrative agency is empowered to judge the case, determine the outcome, set all of the terms and assess fines and penalties, although there may be some level of judicial review in certain cases. The fundamental difference is that many non-U.S. enforcement agencies are regulatory and the governments have enormous power to shape the national economy. Conversely, U.S. antitrust policy promotes the free market and combats those things that harm the free market. It is—and will remain— the courts that decide antitrust cases after hearing the evidence of the enforcers and defense counsel. When everyone is heard and has the opportunity to present evidence, the legitimacy of the system is assured. It is the independence of the judiciary and the guarantee of due process of law that make our system so much better than many around the world.

III. The promise of future international antitrust enforcement: Cooperation and Coordination

14. A major theme of the 2016 campaign revolved around international trade agreements and defense alliances and the heightened concern that they were no longer of value or no longer a cost effective investment for the U.S. Although not specifically articulated or identified, the antitrust enforcement world has an enormous body of treaties, allowing for coordination and information exchange between and among nations, including collaboration and coordination in investigations. In recent times, such agreements were entered with Japan, India and China, among others.

15. Even more important than the bilateral agreements, however, was the formation of the International Competition Network (ICN). The ICN grew out of a recommendation of the International Competition Policy Advisory Committee (ICPAC), a group organized by Attorney General Janet Reno and Assistant Attorney General Joel Klein to evaluate the problems of economic globalization, particularly multi-jurisdictional mergers and international cartels. Out of that idea, a new organization was formed to enhance cooperation and coordination among antitrust enforcers. The Network was launched on October 25, 2001, with 14 jurisdictions represented. Over its 15-year life, the ICN has grown to 120 jurisdictions.

16. Unlike trade agreements and military alliances, the ICN is not a place where jobs could be lost or weapon systems or U.S. troops could be sent to help allies. It is not, and cannot be, a decision-making entity like the World Trade Organization. The ICN brings together enforcers on a regular basis to establish best practices, to discuss cooperation and coordination and educate its members, especially from the developing world. It is an institution that the new Administration should embrace and nurture. For 15 years it has enhanced and developed antitrust globally. The importance of an organization where all its members learn from each other and cooperate with each other on the enforcement field will serve U,S, enforcement policy for decades to come.

IV. Conclusion

17. We certainly live In interesting times. After a chaotic campaign and a very, very surprising result, it is time to govern. The Sherman Act has served the country well for 126 years, protecting free enterprise and punishing those who broke the rules. In the end, it is the skill and dedication of the men and women of the Antitrust Division and the Federal Trade Commission that will make the difference. Those men and women need strong and able leadership to make that difference.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
13 Sep 2018, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Liisa will be giving opening remarks and presenting, "Big Data and Online Behavioral Advertising (OBA): An Advertiser’s Perspective Origins of big data and how to legally acquire data."

26 Sep 2018, Seminar, San Francisco, United States

Please join us for Sheppard Mullin's Labor & Employment Law Update & Happy Hour Seminar Series.

28 Sep 2018, Other, Los Angeles, United States

Leaders today don't just have to worry about nefarious cybercriminals getting "inside" their firewalls; there's an entire ecosystem of SAAS partners, third party vendors and suppliers, and all the hardware from switches to POS terminals that need to be monitored.

Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
In association with
Related Topics
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
McDermott Will & Emery
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions