United States: The Trump Administration: The Future Of Health Care

Last Updated: December 12 2016
Article by Kathy H. Chin, Pamela Landman, Stephanie Marcantonio, Brian T. McGovern and Paul W. Mourning

Most Read Contributor in United States, August 2018

The election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States, along with the Republican control of the majority of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, will likely set in motion a major overhaul of the nation's health care system.  As a candidate, President-elect Trump strongly echoed calls to "repeal and replace" the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act ("ACA") and also called for other reforms that would potentially affect Medicaid funding, pharmaceutical regulation, and the health insurance industry.  Given the relative lack of detail in his policy proposals, it remains to be seen what specific health care policy changes the Trump Administration will present when President-elect Trump takes office in January 2017.  However, a number of sources provide guidance as to potential policy proposals, including:  (i) the Health Care page on the GreatAgain.gov website, (ii) the Health Care page on the Donald J. Trump campaign website, (iii) the 2016 Republican Party Platform adopted by the delegates to the Republican National Convention, (iv) House Republicans' "A Better Way" heath care reform plan, (v) H.R. 3762, 114th Cong. (2016), a reconciliation bill that would have, had it not been vetoed by President Barack Obama, effectively repealed certain provisions of the ACA, and (vi) the Empowering Patients First Act, a bill put forward by Congressman Tom Price, President-elect Trump's designated nominee for Secretary of Health and Human Services ("HHS"). This memorandum covers the various areas of potential change within the nation's current health care system that may be brought about by the Trump Administration, as well as the potential implications of such change.

The Affordable Care Act

The Current Law

The ACA, enacted by President Obama on March 23, 2010, was designed to increase access to quality and affordable health care by (i) providing subsidies to help low and middle income individuals to purchase private health insurance, and (ii) expanding Medicaid coverage to individuals under 65 with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level who were previously ineligible.  In order to facilitate a market for the purchase of health insurance by low and middle income individuals, the ACA mandated the creation of health insurance exchanges offering qualifying health plans in each state (and federal default exchanges).  Individuals who met a certain income threshold yet chose to remain uninsured faced a tax penalty.

In 2012, in response to legal challenges to the ACA, the United States Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate but made Medicaid expansion voluntary.  Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia expanded Medicaid voluntarily, with those states that declined to do so citing cost concerns as a primary factor. Under the ACA, the federal government covers the entire cost of Medicaid expansion through 2016, decreasing to 97 percent in 2017 and 90 percent in 2020 and thereafter.  Nonetheless, numerous states continue to decline the Medicaid expansion under the ACA.

The Proposed Changes to the Law

Republicans have been nearly unanimous in their opposition to the ACA, especially with regard to eliminating the individual mandate provision.  The proposal articulated by President-elect Trump with respect to the ACA on the Donald J. Trump campaign website is to "Completely repeal Obamacare."  However, reflecting the preference of many Republican lawmakers, President-elect Trump has indicated that he is in favor of keeping certain aspects of the ACA, including both the requirement that insurers offer coverage to people with pre-existing health conditions and the provision allowing parents to keep children up to age 26 as dependents on their health insurance.  He has not, however, stated whether he would be in favor of preserving other insurance-related consumer protection provisions of the ACA, such as the community-rating regulations that allow insurers to set premiums based only on age, smoking, and geography without considering sex or health status, and minimum standards for covered benefits.

The success of any repeal requires the Trump Administration to put forth a workable alternative that takes into account the difficulty in unwinding a major law in its sixth year of existence that currently provides insurance coverage for millions of Americans who may not be insured otherwise.  Specifically, since its passage, approximately 22 million additional people have gained health insurance, 10 million of whom purchased health insurance on the state health insurance exchanges.

President-elect Trump's specific proposals to "replace" the ACA are aimed at promoting consumer choice, stimulating competition, and enabling a wider range of health coverage options.  His campaign platform contains the following proposals:

  1. Removing the borders traditionally constraining health insurance markets by allowing insurers and consumers to market and purchase insurance across state lines;
  2. Providing premium assistance in the form of a full tax deduction of premium costs; and1
  3. Expanding the use of flexible, tax-free health savings accounts.

Repeal Strategy – Budget Reconciliation

While Republican control of the majority of both the House of Representatives and the Senate makes major revisions to the ACA possible, Senate Republicans do not hold the "super-majority" of 60 seats in the Senate necessary to override any potential filibuster of legislation by Senate Democrats.  Accordingly, a full repeal of the ACA is unlikely. 

However, many of the central aspects of the ACA, including the individual mandate, are subject to the budget reconciliation process requiring only a simple majority in the Senate to pass.  The budget reconciliation process enables Congress to effect substantive changes to law that affect spending, revenues, and the federal debt limit under strict procedural rules.  Specifically, reconciliation can be used to address most entitlement programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, but not Social Security.

Budget reconciliation would require the House and Senate to first agree on a budget resolution containing "reconciliation directives" to specified committees.  Each committee that receives a directive prepares and adopts proposed legislation through a committee vote.  If a committee fails to meet its budget targets, special procedures enable each chamber of Congress to fill any gaps before the bill goes to the full House or Senate for vote.  However, provisions of reconciliation bills that are extraneous to the purpose of implementing budget changes may be blocked in the Senate.  If it passes both the House and the Senate, the reconciliation measure is then presented to the President for signing. 

In 2016, Congress unsuccessfully attempted to undo portions of the ACA using budget reconciliation.2   That bill, which passed both houses of Congress, but was vetoed by President Obama, would have eliminated: (i) the expansion of Medicaid coverage for adults up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level, (ii) subsidies for middle-income Americans to buy insurance in the state marketplaces, (iii) tax penalties for the uninsured,3  and (iv) many of the taxes created to fund the ACA program, including the "Cadillac" tax.  The bill provided for a two-year period before such provisions were repealed.  This attempt ostensibly provides a blueprint for the Trump Administration, should it decide to dismantle the ACA through budget reconciliation.

Potential Impact

If the Trump Administration follows through with its plan to repeal major portions of the ACA, without replacing them with measures that would preserve health care insurance for those currently covered, the market impact of millions of people losing insurance would be significant.  Hospitals and insurance companies would likely be affected negatively.  For hospitals, increased insurance under the ACA has led to greater demand for care, increased revenue, and lower uncompensated care provided to the uninsured.  In addition, insurers could lose millions of customers, both from the individual market and under state Medicaid programs.

The problem of "adverse selection" may become more pronounced without an individual mandate provision, as it is likely that some individuals may not purchase insurance unless and until they need it.  If the Trump Administration remains committed to eliminating the individual mandate but chooses to maintain the requirement that insurers offer coverage to people with pre-existing conditions, significant risk-pool problems could arise, with insurers being forced to cover a sicker and more costly population without attracting enough healthy enrollees.  Indeed, the ACA's coupling of the individual mandate and the pre-existing condition rule was meant to address this problem.

Changes Outside of the ACA

President-elect Trump's campaign platform also includes proposals addressing Medicaid, Medicare, and pharmaceutical regulation and pricing.

Medicaid Policy

Currently, federal Medicaid funding to the states is determined by the federal Medical Assistance Percentages ("FMAP"), which use measures such as per capita income to determine the amount of federal matching funds provided to the states.  According to this guideline, for every $1 in state funds spent on Medicaid, states can draw at least $1 additional from the federal government based on the FMAP minimum, up to as much as $2.85 in certain states.  As a result, there is no ceiling on federal Medicaid expenditures.  Because the current system for financing Medicaid concerns budget outlays and appropriations, numerous Congresses have attempted to alter it through the budget reconciliation process.

The Republicans, President-elect Trump included, envision shifting more control to the states in order to maximize "state flexibility." President-elect Trump proposes to "block-fund" Medicaid, pursuant to which states would be required to administer their Medicaid programs with a fixed amount of federal funding. The intended result is to make states more prudent in the administration of Medicaid and create a greater incentive to eliminate fraud, a perennial concern of many Republicans. House Republican's "A Better Way" proposal is broader and offers the states a choice between a per capita allotment or a block grant to fund care provided under Medicaid.  These reforms could have a significant budget impact on states.  The states that have expanded Medicaid under the ACA generally stand to see a negative impact, which may require such states to restrict eligibility and/or limit benefits within their respective Medicaid programs.

Medicare Policy

President-elect Trump's campaign website and his GreatAgain.gov transition website are largely silent with respect to addressing Medicare, with references to "modernizing Medicare." Because the Republican Party Platform and the House Republican's proposals are intended to expand consumer choice, also a dominant feature in President-elect Trump's proposals, it is possible that the Trump Administration would closely consider such proposals or adopt them entirely. 

Payment Structure

Currently, Medicare provides two general options for beneficiaries: traditional Medicare or Medicare Advantage.  In traditional Medicare, reimbursement is made to providers through a fee-for-service system.  Medicare Advantage, on the other hand, allows beneficiaries to enroll in private insurance plans approved by Medicare.  Medicare pays the private insurance plan a monthly capitated fee.  The Republican platform broadly calls for introduction of an alternative option to traditional Medicare, a "premium-support model designed to strengthen patient choice, promote cost-saving competing among providers, and better guard against fraud and abuse . . ." Although Medicare has been partly privatized through the Medicare Advantage Program, the House Republicans' proposal clarifies that this option would offer a range of different coverage plans, unlike Medicare Advantage, which requires identical benefits be offered to all beneficiaries regardless of differences in health status. 

Value-Based Care

The ACA included a series of reforms to the way in which Medicare reimburses health care providers, which were designed to decrease utilization and increase quality through broader provider integration, capitated payments and coordination of care.  This was consistent with the seemingly wide consensus over the need to tie Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement to quality measures.  Medicare Advantage, for example, is looked upon favorably by most Republicans and is lauded as a successful model of promoting value-based care in the House Republicans' reform plan.  However, because of the interplay between the ACA and its emphasis on accountable care, a complete repeal of the law would also mean ending important initiatives to promote and develop successful models for value-based care, a key example of which is the ACA-funded CMS Innovation Center which was created by the ACA for the purpose of testing innovative payment and service delivery models to decrease expenditures while preserving or enhancing the quality of care for beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid or Children's Health Insurance Program.  The House Republican's proposal contemplates eliminating the CMS Innovation Center and shifting the role of developing innovative payment and service delivery models to the states by promoting state innovation grants.  Congressman Price has been a vocal opponent of certain mandatory "bundled payment" initiatives. Notwithstanding any repeal of the ACA, it is likely that the market-place drivers of value-based care and pay-for-performance will continue to push the health care payors, public and private, in this direction.

Drug Regulation and Pricing

Similar to President-elect Trump's proposals related to health insurance, it is likely that the Trump Administration will also seek to remove barriers to open competition in the pharmaceutical market. Specifically, the President-elect has called for allowing the importation of drugs from abroad, and the first 100 day plan includes "cutting the red tape at the FDA" in order to speed up the process for "over 4000 drugs awaiting approval." President-elect Trump has also called for allowing Medicare to take advantage of its market power and negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies for lower rates.

Appointment of Tom Price

On November 29, 2016, the Trump Administration stated that it would appoint Congressman Tom Price as Secretary of HHS and Seema Verma, a health-care consultant, to run the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS").

HHS is an executive level agency responsible for administering federal health care programs and executing laws under its authority.  It oversees over 100 programs nationwide and implements parts of the ACA that deal with private and public health insurance.  HHS also regulates and enforces laws related to health information privacy, clinical research, and civil rights.  HHS is headed by the Secretary.  It is the overseeing agency of a number of sub-agencies, including the Food and Drug Administration and CMS, which administers the Medicare program and along with the states, Medicaid and Children's Health Insurance Program.  Both the Secretary of HHS and the Administrator at CMS are appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate and serve without fixed terms.

Congressman Price is the U.S. Representative for Georgia's 6th congressional district, serving since 2005. He currently serves as chairman of the House Budget Committee and was previously chairman of the Republican Study Committee and the Republican Policy Committee.  A former physician and veteran lawmaker, he has been a staunch critic of the ACA.  Price has proposed legislation that, if passed, would have replaced the ACA. 

First introduced in the 111th Congress, the Empowering Patients First Act sponsored by Price has as its first provision the repeal of the ACA.4 In its place the bill would provide for a tax credit and deductions to offset the cost of insurance.  In addition, the bill would allow individuals to opt out of Medicare, Medicaid, and other government payment programs and instead receive a tax credit to purchase health insurance, without losing Social Security benefits.  The legislation also calls for the promotion of state-based high-risk insurance pools and the creation of individual and small employer membership associations and association health plans.  Other aspects of the bill are similar to proposals put forth by House Republicans, including the "A Better Way" proposal.

As Secretary of HHS, Congressman Price will have significant influence in shaping the administrative agenda of the agency.  Congressman Price would be in a position as Secretary to exert significant input in developing the legislation to replace of the ACA.  It would then fall to HHS to draft most of the rules needed to implement whatever legislation is passed.  We anticipate that any replacement to the ACA, like the ACA itself, would require significant regulatory input to address the numerous detailed aspects of insurance regulation, Medicare, Medicaid, and other elements.    

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

CMS has responsibility over the administrative simplification standards under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, quality standards in long term care facilities and laboratories, and oversight over HealthCare.gov, the website operated by the federal government to facilitate the health insurance exchanges under the ACA.  CMS is authorized to formulate rules through notice and comment and has thereby implemented numerous significant administrative rules impacting many facets of health care.  Importantly, CMS works with states in connection with the expansion of Medicaid under the ACA.

Seema Verma is the CEO of a health policy consulting firm who has worked in designing Medicaid expansion in a number of Republican leaning states, including Indiana and Kentucky.  As head of CMS, Verma would be in position to set the policy agenda of the agency in line with the Trump Administration.  In particular, CMS would be in charge of implementing reforms to Medicare and Medicaid such as switching to a block grant system, which the Trump Administration has proposed.  If the ACA were to remain, CMS would have significant control over the waiver process pertaining to the expansion of Medicaid. 

Takeaways

While the election of Donald J. Trump as the 45th President of the United States, along with the Republican control of the majority of both the House of Representatives and the Senate, will result in changes to ACA, a full repeal of such legislation is unlikely and any changes will likely be phased in over at least a two year period.  This is in part due to the complexity of drafting an alternative that addresses the concerns of individual consumers, health care providers, and insurance companies.  We will continue to monitor changes in legislation or agency rulemakings and policies that will impact the health care marketplace.

Footnotes

1. The House Republicans' plan also looks to the tax code to aid consumers in affording health insurance, and such plan may possibly be adopted as a stronger alternative. Instead of a tax deduction, the House Republicans proposed in "A Better Way" to provide an advanceable, refundable tax credit adjusted for age to be used for purchasing health insurance. Any funds leftover after premium costs would automatically be applied to a health savings account.

2. H.R. 3762, 114th Cong. (2016).

3. While not a repeal of the "individual mandate" and the "employer mandate," the bill eliminated the penalties associated with non-compliance.

4. H.R. 3400, 111th Cong. (2009).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions