United States: CFTC Reproposes Rules Limiting Speculative Futures And Swaps Positions, Finalizes Aggregation Rules

Last Updated: December 12 2016
Article by Robert Zwirb

Most Read Contributor in United States, August 2018

The CFTC voted unanimously to repropose position limits rules, which would place limits on speculative futures and swaps positions. In a separate vote, the CFTC approved final aggregation rules

If adopted, the proposed rules would:

  • limit speculative positions in 25 core physical commodity futures contracts and their "economically equivalent" futures, options and swaps;
  • provide requirements and acceptable practices to Designated Contract Markets ("DCMs") and Swap Execution Facilities ("SEFs") for (i) setting position limits for the 25 referenced contracts and (ii) exchange position limits or accountability rules in all other listed contracts;
  • permit the exchange recognition of non-enumerated bona fide hedging positions and certain enumerated anticipatory hedge positions, and the granting of spread exemptions;
  • update reporting requirements under Part 19 of the CFTC Rules; and
  • delay any requirement, for DCMs and SEFs that lack access to sufficient swap position information, to establish position limits on swaps that are subject to a federal position limit.

The CFTC also is reproposing the definition of bona fide hedging position, as well as exemptions for bona fide hedging positions in physical commodities.

Under the CFTC proposal, spot month limits would be set at initial levels based on 25 percent of estimated of deliverable supply, as submitted by a DCM and verified by the CFTC, or at lower levels, as recommended by a DCM. Non-spot month limits would be set at initial levels based on a percentage formula applied to open interest in futures and swaps.

This last reproposal is a response to comments on a proposal that was published in December 2013, and on a supplemental proposal that was published in June 2016.

In his supporting statement, CFTC Chair Timothy Massad voiced his approval of the reproposal:

The proposal we are issuing today provides extensive analysis of the impact of the proposed spot and all months limits, which I believe supports the view that the limits should not compromise liquidity while addressing excessive speculation. The analysis shows few existing positions would exceed the limits, and that is without considering possible exemptions.

I recognize there will still be those that are critical of the proposal. . . . But while the Commission should consider all comments, it is important to remember that the Commission has a responsibility to implement a balanced rule that achieves the objectives Congress has established.

CFTC Commissioner Christopher J. Giancarlo added that the proposal provides the "basis for the implementation of a final position limits rule" that he is willing to support.

The aggregation rules amend  CFTC Rules Part 150 ("Limits on Positions") with respect to the policy for aggregation under the position limits regime for futures and option contracts on nine agricultural commodities. The CFTC's current account aggregation standards, which generally require the aggregation of positions held in accounts for any person controlling or holding ten percent or more of the ownership of such accounts, would permit additional exemptions from aggregation where:

  • the sharing of information would violate or create the reasonable risk of violating federal, state or foreign jurisdiction laws or regulations;
  • ownership interest is greater than ten percent in an entity whose trading is controlled independently and a notice filing has been submitted to the CFTC; and
  • ownership results from broker-dealer activities in the person's normal course of business as a dealer.

Commentary/Bob Zwirb

By reaffirming its past position that it need not find the proposed limits to be necessary, and would make such a finding only "[o]ut of an abundance of caution," the CFTC leaves the impression that when it evaluates the evidence, it is really just going through the motions. That impression is confirmed on page 59 of the preamble to the reproposal, where the CFTC quotes a commenter as complaining that "[t]he necessity finding . . . proffered by the Commission – which consists of a discussion of two historical events and a cursory review of existing studies and reports on position limits related issues – falls short of a comprehensive analysis and justification for the proposed position limits." The CFTC responds to this important accusation with a simple denial: "We disagree with the commenter's opinion that the Commission's analysis is not comprehensive or falls short of justifying the reproposed rule."

As it has done in the past, the CFTC continues to rely on two lone episodes of manipulation and a tally of studies on speculation, position limits, etc. to support its rationale. Although the CFTC spends more time evaluating such studies in the reproposal than it has previously, it still treats them all as worthy of consideration. One of the problems with that approach is this: the economic studies that are considered here range from empirically rigorous to junk science; from academically respectable to polemical tracts by interested parties with no known expertise (such as Better Markets). Indeed, a number of the studies have nothing to do with speculation or position limits or even the futures and derivatives markets. Most alarming is the CFTC's conclusion that the limits are warranted because there is "no broad academic consensus" for or against such limits. Leaving aside the fact that even this conclusion was contradicted by the findings of the CFTC's own Energy and Environmental Markets Committee just last February (findings that were withdrawn after Senator Elizabeth Warren applied pressure), the CFTC apparently has decided to forge ahead with the reproposal, empirical evidence be damned.

Before imposing a highly complex, burdensome and costly rule that encompasses over 900 pages of text, a government agency should consider whether the rule is necessary for the proper functioning of the markets.

Commentary/Steven Lofchie

This proposal is meant to serve political and not regulatory purposes. If energy prices spike (as they often do in the ordinary course), proponents of the proposal will assert that the rule would have kept prices down if it had been adopted. Beyond that specific use, the proposal will be ignored (and rightly so).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions