United States: California Court Upholds Environmental Impact Report For Golden State Warriors Arena

Last Updated: December 12 2016
Article by Paula C. Kirlin

Paula C. Kirlin is a Partner in our San Francisco office .

HIGHLIGHTS:

  • A recent California First District Court of Appeals decision in Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure et al. affirmed an earlier ruling upholding certification of a Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) for a new arena for the Golden State Warriors.
  • This is one of the first published appellate court decisions addressing the sufficiency of greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts analysis under California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) following the California Supreme Court's decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife.
  • The court rejected challengers' claim that the FSEIR was required to quantify the project's GHG emissions and upheld analysis based on consistency with San Francisco's GHG Reduction Strategy.

The California First District Court of Appeals issued its decision on Nov. 29, 2016, in Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure et al. The Court of Appeals decision affirmed the July 18, 2016, trial court's decision upholding the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (FSEIR) for a new arena for the National Basketball Association's (NBA) Golden State Warriors by the San Francisco Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure (OCII) on Nov. 3, 2015.1

Most notably, the decision upheld the City of San Francisco's analysis of greenhouse gas (GHG) impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) based on the project's consistency with San Francisco's Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy, and rejected petitioners' claim that the FSEIR must quantify the project's GHG impacts.2 The case is one of the first published appellate court decisions addressing the sufficiency of GHG impacts analysis following the California Supreme Court's decision in Center for Biological Diversity v. Dept. of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204 (commonly referred to as the "Newhall" decision). In that case, the Newhall court identified several pathways that may be appropriate for addressing GHG, but did not "guarantee" that any specific pathway would be sufficient.

This alert highlights the Mission Bay Alliance decision's key holding regarding GHG impacts analysis and identifies factors that support reliance on a performance standard to evaluate GHG impacts under CEQA.

The Warriors Arena Project

The Warriors Arena project would be located on an 11-acre site in San Francisco's Mission Bay South redevelopment plan area, and would include a 488,000-square-foot multipurpose event center to serve as the home of the Golden State Warriors, two office and retail structures, parking facilities and 3.2 acres of open space.

The project was certified by Gov. Jerry Brown in April 2015 as an "environmental leadership development project" under Assembly Bill (AB) 900 (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §§21178, et seq.). The AB 900 certification authorizes streamlined judicial review for CEQA challenges where a project meets certain criteria, including that the project does not result in any net additional emission of GHG, including GHG emissions from employee transportation (Cal. Pub. Res. Code §21183(c)).

The AB 900 application3 included a technical memorandum quantifying the project's direct and indirect GHG emissions. California Air Resources Board staff conducted a technical evaluation of the GHG emission estimates and voluntary mitigation and concluded that the proposed project would not result in any net additional GHG emissions for purposes of AB 900 certification. Although the proposed project's GHG emissions were calculated for the AB 900 application, the FSEIR did not consider GHG emissions quantification as part of the CEQA analysis of GHG impacts and only evaluated the project's consistency with San Francisco's GHG Reduction Strategy. The parties agreed that the Governor's AB 900 certification serves a distinct purpose, and is not a substitute for a CEQA determination on the significance of GHG emissions. Therefore, the Governor's conclusion that the project would have no net increase of GHG emissions was not material to the court's holding regarding the sufficiency of the Warriors arena EIR's analysis of GHG impacts pursuant to CEQA.

Quantification of GHG Impacts Not Required in All Cases

The FSEIR concluded that the Warriors arena project would not have significant GHG impacts because the project would comply with San Francisco's GHG Reduction Strategy. The FSEIR did not include an individual project-specific impact assessment of GHG emissions. Challengers argued that exclusive reliance on performance-based standards such as consistency with San Francisco's GHG Reduction Strategy is inadequate; they asserted that the FSEIR must quantify the project's GHG emissions and calculate the effect of proposed mitigation measures.4 The Mission Bay Alliance court flatly disagreed with petitioners' contention. The court based its decision on three key factors: a) the CEQA Guidelines, b) the Newhall case and c) the San Francisco GHG Reduction Strategy.

a. CEQA Guidelines allow reliance on performance-based standards.

The Mission Bay Alliance court noted that the CEQA Guidelines expressly allow agencies to either quantify GHG emissions from a project or to rely on performance-based standards. The court cited the CEQA Guidelines as granting lead agencies "discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to: (1) Use a model or methodology to quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and which model to use ... and/or (2) Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards" (CEQA Guidelines §15064.4(a)).

The court cited the California Natural Resources Agency's reasoning in adopting the CEQA Guidelines: "CEQA does not require quantification of emissions in every instance.... If the lead agency determines that quantification is not possible, would not yield information that would assist in analyzing the project's impacts and determining the significance of [GHG] emissions, or is not appropriate in the context of the particular project, section 15064.4(a) would allow the lead agency to consider qualitative factors or performance standards."5 The court further reasoned that GHGs by nature contribute to global climate change but "with little immediate perceptible effect on the locale from which they emanate," and therefore compliance with an area-wide GHG reduction plan may be more useful in determining the significance of emissions than quantification of a project's incremental addition to GHG emissions.

With respect to qualitative GHG impacts analysis, the court cited Guidelines Section 15183.5(b), which authorizes a lead agency to adopt an area-wide plan to reduce GHG emissions and determine that a project's incremental contribution to climate change is not significant if the project complies with the requirements of the previously adopted plan. The court similarly noted that the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) CEQA Guidelines encourage local agencies to adopt GHG reduction plans and to use those plans in making CEQA determinations.

The court agreed with plaintiffs that the CEQA Guidelines provide that a lead agency should make a good-faith effort, based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data, to describe, calculate or estimate the amount of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project, and the extent to which the project may increase or reduce GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting. However, the court concluded unequivocally that "the [CEQA] Guidelines do not compel a numeric estimate of every project's greenhouse gas emissions."

b. The Newhall case allows GHG analysis using performance-based standards.

Petitioners argued that Newhall requires a lead agency to first quantify a project's GHG emissions before analyzing consistency with a GHG reduction plan. The Mission Bay Alliance court noted that while the agency in Newhall did quantify project emissions, the Newhall court did not hold quantification to be necessary in every case. Rather, the Newhall decision identified "potential pathways to compliance" with CEQA, including a performance-based methodology in which an agency evaluates the significance of a project's GHG impacts by "looking to compliance with regulatory programs designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions." Accordingly, the Mission Bay Alliance court held that compliance with a GHG reduction plan may, standing alone, provide sufficient evidence that the project will have no significant adverse effect on the environment.

c. San Francisco's GHG Reduction Strategy achieves reductions consistent with local and state targets.

The Mission Bay Alliance court's conclusion that the FSEIR appropriately analyzed GHG impacts based on a performance standard was based in part on the adequacy of the San Francisco GHG Reduction Strategy itself. The strategy includes a quantification of baseline levels of GHG emissions and planned reductions from the baseline 1990 level of 25 percent less emissions by 2020, 40 percent less by 2025 and 80 percent less by 2050. The "heart" of the GHG Reduction Strategy is project-specific measures that achieve citywide emissions reductions. The court cited BAAQMD's approval of the San Francisco GHG Reduction Strategy, in which BAAQMD concluded that the City's planned GHG reductions were more stringent than state standards and that San Francisco "is on track for meeting this aggressive target." The court acknowledged that, in fact, San Francisco had successfully reduced GHG emissions by 14.5 percent between 1990 and 2010, despite an 11 percent population increase during the same time period. Accordingly, the court supported the FSEIR's conclusion that the project complies with energy efficiency and conservation standards set by the GHG Reduction Strategy, and thus, is consistent with citywide and statewide GHG reduction targets.

In concluding that compliance with a GHG reduction plan may, standing alone, provide sufficient evidence that the project will have no significant adverse effect on the environment, the Mission Bay Alliance court cited Newhall for the proposition that "[to] the extent a project incorporates efficiency and conservation measures sufficient to contribute its portion of the overall [GHG] reductions necessary, one can reasonably argue that the project's impact is not cumulatively considerable because it is helping to solve the cumulative problem of [GHG] emissions as envisioned by California law." Here, GHG emissions reductions associated with the San Francisco GHG Reduction Strategy had been quantified, including reductions attributable to project-specific measures that would achieve citywide emissions reductions that exceed state standards. Although GHG emissions associated with the Warriors arena were not quantified for the FSEIR, the project was shown to be consistent with measures for which the City had previously quantified GHG emissions reductions and demonstrated that the reductions would help San Francisco attain (and exceed) local and state GHG reduction targets. As such, the underlying quantification of GHG emissions reductions associated with the GHG Reduction Strategy were a key component of the substantial evidence relied on by the Mission Bay Alliance court to uphold the FSEIR's conclusion that the project is compliant with energy efficiency and conservation standards set by the San Francisco GHG Reduction Strategy and that the project therefore would not have a significant adverse effect on the environment in this respect.

Conclusion

While the sufficiency of GHG impacts analysis under CEQA remains an unstable area of the law, the Mission Bay Alliance case is instructive in illustrating factors that would support reliance on consistency with a GHG reduction plan to determine the significance of GHG impacts under CEQA following the California Supreme Court's Newhall decision.    

Notes

1. Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure et al. (Court of Appeal of the State of California, First Appellate District, Nov. 29, 2016). The FSEIR prepared for the Warriors arena project tiered from the 1998 Final Supplemental EIR for the Mission Bay North and South redevelopment plans, which had incorporated information from the 1990 EIR for the Mission Bay plan.

2. The Mission Bay Alliance decision also found that the FSEIR's analysis of transportation, noise, wind, and toxic air contaminants impacts was adequate, and that the FSEIR appropriately excluded certain issues from further review. Finally, the decision rejected challenges regarding consistency with zoning and issuance of a place of entertainment permit for the event center.

3. The project's AB 900 application and related documentation, including the Governor's Certification and California Air Resources Board Determination, are available online.
 

4. Similar arguments were made in an amicus brief filed by the Center for Biological Diversity, Coalition for Clean Air, Communities for a Better Environment and the Sunset Coalition in support of the Mission Bay Alliance.

5. Citing Cal. Natural Resources Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action (December 2009).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions