United States: WTO Panel Finds That US Tax Incentives For Aircraft Constitute Prohibited Subsidies

Last Updated: December 7 2016
Article by Dylan Geraets

On November 28, 2016, a World Trade Organization ("WTO") Panel ("Panel") issued its report in United States – Conditional Tax Incentives for Large Civil Aircraft.1 The dispute concerned seven tax-related incentives for civil aircraft ("aerospace tax measures") provided by the state of Washington in the United States. The European Union claimed that the availability of the tax incentives was conditional on "the initial siting of a 'significant commercial airplane manufacturing program' in the state of Washington."2

The European Union said that the Washington State tax incentives constituted a prohibited subsidy in the sense of Article 3.1(b) and 3.2 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures ("SCM Agreement") on the ground that the incentives were contingent on the use of domestic over imported goods. The Panel found in favor of the European Union as it held that the favorable tax rate for the manufacturing or sale of commercial airplanes is a prohibited subsidy within the meaning of the SCM Agreement.

The Panel's decision is one in a long series of disputes between the United States and the European Union on the granting of subsidies to their respective large civil aircraft manufacturers—Boeing Co. and Airbus Group SE. At the time of writing, the WTO's Appellate Body is dealing with the appeal brought by the United States and the European Union in EC – Aircraft (21.5). Another WTO panel is expected to issue its report in the compliance proceedings in US – Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) in early 2017. Importantly, as the Panel noted, the measures at issue in this dispute amended the tax measures that are at issue in that initial proceeding. It is expected that the United States will also make use of its right to appeal the Panel's findings in this dispute.

The Panel's Findings With Respect to the Tax Incentives as Constituting a Subsidy within the Meaning of the SCM Agreement

The European Union challenged the existence of seven aerospace tax measures, including reduced business and occupation ("B&O") tax rates, B&O tax credits, exemptions from sales, use, leasehold excise, and property taxes.3 The European Union argued that these tax measures constituted prohibited subsidies as they are contingent upon the use of domestic (US) goods over imported goods. It considered that this contingency arose from two "siting" provisions contained in "Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5952 ("ESSB 5952").

At the outset it is important to note that the WTO Agreement does not prohibit WTO Members from granting subsidies per se. In principle, subsidization is permitted, but the SCM Agreement provides WTO Members with tools to address the injurious effects of subsidies in the form of countervailing measures. Nevertheless, Article 3 of the SCM Agreement also explicitly prohibits two types of subsidies that its drafters considered to be distortive of trade: (i) subsidies contingent upon the export performance of the recipient and (ii) subsidies contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods by the recipient. This dispute deals with the second type of prohibited subsidies.

The Panel began its analysis by determining whether, as the European Union had claimed, the aerospace tax measures constituted subsidies in the sense of the SCM Agreement. Generally speaking, a subsidy is found to exist if there is a financial contribution by a government or public body that confers a benefit on the recipient.

In a highly systematic and structural fashion, the Panel analyzed each of the seven measures and concluded that each of these measures constitutes a financial contribution because "government revenue that is otherwise due is foregone or not collected."4

In the next step of its analysis, the Panel determined whether through the existence of that financial contribution a "benefit" was conferred upon the recipient. It applied the standard test for this determination and assessed whether the recipient of the subsidy was "better off" than it would otherwise have been, absent the financial contribution. The Panel briefly reviewed some of the case law on this issue and considered, in particular, that "by virtue of foregoing revenue, that departure from the norm means that the taxpayers that are subject to the government's normative departure owe less than they otherwise would under the "normal" taxation rules.5 The Panel also referenced the panel's findings in US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint), which had concluded that "the relevant tax break is essentially a gift from the government ... and it is clear that the market does not give such gifts."6 Ultimately, the Panel concluded that each of the aerospace tax measures conferred a benefit upon its recipient. Notably, the analysis of the Panel might at times be considered as conflating the concepts of "financial contribution" and "benefit."7

In addition to establishing the existence of a "financial contribution" and a "benefit," for a subsidy to be found to exist, it must be assessed whether that subsidy is "specific" in the sense of Article 2 of the SCM Agreement. However, as paragraph 3 of that provision considers each prohibited subsidy to be "specific" per se – and since the European Union only challenged the existence of "prohibited subsidies" – the distinct element of "specificity" was not addressed by the Panel.

Whether the Aerospace Tax Measures Constituted Prohibited Subsidies Within the Meaning of the SCM Agreement

Instead, the Panel proceeded directly to a determination as to whether the tax measures constituted prohibited subsidies in the sense of Article 3 of the SCM Agreement. The Panel first established the appropriate legal standard under that provision by interpreting the terms "contingency," "over," "use" and "goods."8 It found that the term "contingency" has the same meaning in both subparagraph 3.1(a) and subparagraph 3.1(b) of the agreement. The term "over" was found by the Panel as indicating that any subsidy "that is conditional on the use of domestic goods in preference to (or "instead of" or "rather than") imported goods" is prohibited. "Use" was interpreted as being broad enough to also cover the "consumption" or "employment" of domestic goods over imported goods, and not merely "the consumption of goods ... as inputs into a production process," as the United States had argued. Finally, the term "goods" was interpreted as being synonymous with "products."

The European Union had alleged that the aerospace tax measures were de jure and de facto contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods. Its de jure claim "would be made on the basis of the express terms of the text of the measure or by necessary implication therefrom," whereas its de facto claim "would have to be inferred 'from the total configuration of facts constituting and surrounding the subsidy grant, including the design, structure and modalities of operation set out in the measure.'"9

In order to establish the existence of de jure contingency the Panel examined whether the First Siting Provision and the Second Siting Provision in the text of ESSB 5952 read individually or together make the granting of the subsidy contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods. The Panel rejected these de jure claims. It noted that the siting provisions "on their face" provide for the "siting" of certain manufacturing activities within the state of Washington as a condition for the enjoyment of tax benefits, but that the provisions "do not make the receipt or continued enjoyment of subsidies dependent on refraining from using imported products."10

The Panel then continued its analysis by examining the potential de facto import substitution contingency of the aerospace tax measures. It observed that there are no precedents on the criteria that would have to be used. It opted to proceed on the basis that it would need to determine the manner in which the measures were "structured, designed, and operate." The Panel focused on the B&O aerospace tax rate for the manufacturing or sale of commercial airplanes under the "777X programme." It found that the fact that this tax rate would be lost if Boeing used wings produced outside of Washington State, even if it maintained production of such wings in Washington State, made the programme contingent upon the use of wings made in Washington State.

On this basis the Panel concluded that the United States had acted inconsistently with its WTO obligations by violating Article 3.1(b), and by necessary implication, Article 3.2 of the SCM Agreement. Notably, in respect of "prohibited subsidies," the SCM Agreement mandates the Panel to rule that such a subsidy should be withdrawn without delay. Consequently, the Panel recommended the United States withdraw the subsidy without delay and within 90 days.11 The Panel refrained from making suggestions concerning steps that the United States could take in order to implement the Panel's recommendation.

Relevance of the Findings in the Panel Report

The importance of the Panel report in US – Tax Incentives is twofold. First, the Panel report presents a new interpretation of Article 3 of the SCM Agreement relating to the conditionality of a subsidy scheme upon the use of domestic over imported goods. Considering that this is the first time in the Airbus-Boeing saga that the existence of prohibited subsidies has been established, it will be interesting to see whether, and if so how, the United States will give effect to the Panel's recommendation. Second, the Panel report presents the next chapter in the long-running Airbus-Boeing saga that is being written in the WTO dispute settlement system. It is expected that this Panel report will also be appealed, adding to the long list of disputes over subsidies in the large civil aircraft sector that are being fought out in Geneva.


1 Panel Report,United States – Conditional Tax Incentives for Large Civil Aircraft,WT/DS487//R, 28 November, 2016 (hereinafter:US – Tax Incentives). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/487r_e.pdf

2 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.3.

3 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.2. The measures are described in detail in paras. 7.17-7.26.

4 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.157.

5 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.160.

6 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.161.

7 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.163. The Panel itself acknowledged this and considered that it is "not precluded from using the same factual elements" for determining the existence of both elements of a subsidy.

8 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, paras. 7.202-7.225.

9 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.170.

10 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.315.

11 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 8.6.

Originally published December 6, 2016

Learn more about our International Trade practice.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.