United States: WTO Panel Finds That US Tax Incentives For Aircraft Constitute Prohibited Subsidies

Last Updated: December 7 2016
Article by Dylan Geraets

On November 28, 2016, a World Trade Organization ("WTO") Panel ("Panel") issued its report in United States – Conditional Tax Incentives for Large Civil Aircraft.1 The dispute concerned seven tax-related incentives for civil aircraft ("aerospace tax measures") provided by the state of Washington in the United States. The European Union claimed that the availability of the tax incentives was conditional on "the initial siting of a 'significant commercial airplane manufacturing program' in the state of Washington."2

The European Union said that the Washington State tax incentives constituted a prohibited subsidy in the sense of Article 3.1(b) and 3.2 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures ("SCM Agreement") on the ground that the incentives were contingent on the use of domestic over imported goods. The Panel found in favor of the European Union as it held that the favorable tax rate for the manufacturing or sale of commercial airplanes is a prohibited subsidy within the meaning of the SCM Agreement.

The Panel's decision is one in a long series of disputes between the United States and the European Union on the granting of subsidies to their respective large civil aircraft manufacturers—Boeing Co. and Airbus Group SE. At the time of writing, the WTO's Appellate Body is dealing with the appeal brought by the United States and the European Union in EC – Aircraft (21.5). Another WTO panel is expected to issue its report in the compliance proceedings in US – Large Civil Aircraft (Second Complaint) in early 2017. Importantly, as the Panel noted, the measures at issue in this dispute amended the tax measures that are at issue in that initial proceeding. It is expected that the United States will also make use of its right to appeal the Panel's findings in this dispute.

The Panel's Findings With Respect to the Tax Incentives as Constituting a Subsidy within the Meaning of the SCM Agreement

The European Union challenged the existence of seven aerospace tax measures, including reduced business and occupation ("B&O") tax rates, B&O tax credits, exemptions from sales, use, leasehold excise, and property taxes.3 The European Union argued that these tax measures constituted prohibited subsidies as they are contingent upon the use of domestic (US) goods over imported goods. It considered that this contingency arose from two "siting" provisions contained in "Engrossed Substitute Senate Bill 5952 ("ESSB 5952").

At the outset it is important to note that the WTO Agreement does not prohibit WTO Members from granting subsidies per se. In principle, subsidization is permitted, but the SCM Agreement provides WTO Members with tools to address the injurious effects of subsidies in the form of countervailing measures. Nevertheless, Article 3 of the SCM Agreement also explicitly prohibits two types of subsidies that its drafters considered to be distortive of trade: (i) subsidies contingent upon the export performance of the recipient and (ii) subsidies contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods by the recipient. This dispute deals with the second type of prohibited subsidies.

The Panel began its analysis by determining whether, as the European Union had claimed, the aerospace tax measures constituted subsidies in the sense of the SCM Agreement. Generally speaking, a subsidy is found to exist if there is a financial contribution by a government or public body that confers a benefit on the recipient.

In a highly systematic and structural fashion, the Panel analyzed each of the seven measures and concluded that each of these measures constitutes a financial contribution because "government revenue that is otherwise due is foregone or not collected."4

In the next step of its analysis, the Panel determined whether through the existence of that financial contribution a "benefit" was conferred upon the recipient. It applied the standard test for this determination and assessed whether the recipient of the subsidy was "better off" than it would otherwise have been, absent the financial contribution. The Panel briefly reviewed some of the case law on this issue and considered, in particular, that "by virtue of foregoing revenue, that departure from the norm means that the taxpayers that are subject to the government's normative departure owe less than they otherwise would under the "normal" taxation rules.5 The Panel also referenced the panel's findings in US – Large Civil Aircraft (2nd Complaint), which had concluded that "the relevant tax break is essentially a gift from the government ... and it is clear that the market does not give such gifts."6 Ultimately, the Panel concluded that each of the aerospace tax measures conferred a benefit upon its recipient. Notably, the analysis of the Panel might at times be considered as conflating the concepts of "financial contribution" and "benefit."7

In addition to establishing the existence of a "financial contribution" and a "benefit," for a subsidy to be found to exist, it must be assessed whether that subsidy is "specific" in the sense of Article 2 of the SCM Agreement. However, as paragraph 3 of that provision considers each prohibited subsidy to be "specific" per se – and since the European Union only challenged the existence of "prohibited subsidies" – the distinct element of "specificity" was not addressed by the Panel.

Whether the Aerospace Tax Measures Constituted Prohibited Subsidies Within the Meaning of the SCM Agreement

Instead, the Panel proceeded directly to a determination as to whether the tax measures constituted prohibited subsidies in the sense of Article 3 of the SCM Agreement. The Panel first established the appropriate legal standard under that provision by interpreting the terms "contingency," "over," "use" and "goods."8 It found that the term "contingency" has the same meaning in both subparagraph 3.1(a) and subparagraph 3.1(b) of the agreement. The term "over" was found by the Panel as indicating that any subsidy "that is conditional on the use of domestic goods in preference to (or "instead of" or "rather than") imported goods" is prohibited. "Use" was interpreted as being broad enough to also cover the "consumption" or "employment" of domestic goods over imported goods, and not merely "the consumption of goods ... as inputs into a production process," as the United States had argued. Finally, the term "goods" was interpreted as being synonymous with "products."

The European Union had alleged that the aerospace tax measures were de jure and de facto contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods. Its de jure claim "would be made on the basis of the express terms of the text of the measure or by necessary implication therefrom," whereas its de facto claim "would have to be inferred 'from the total configuration of facts constituting and surrounding the subsidy grant, including the design, structure and modalities of operation set out in the measure.'"9

In order to establish the existence of de jure contingency the Panel examined whether the First Siting Provision and the Second Siting Provision in the text of ESSB 5952 read individually or together make the granting of the subsidy contingent upon the use of domestic over imported goods. The Panel rejected these de jure claims. It noted that the siting provisions "on their face" provide for the "siting" of certain manufacturing activities within the state of Washington as a condition for the enjoyment of tax benefits, but that the provisions "do not make the receipt or continued enjoyment of subsidies dependent on refraining from using imported products."10

The Panel then continued its analysis by examining the potential de facto import substitution contingency of the aerospace tax measures. It observed that there are no precedents on the criteria that would have to be used. It opted to proceed on the basis that it would need to determine the manner in which the measures were "structured, designed, and operate." The Panel focused on the B&O aerospace tax rate for the manufacturing or sale of commercial airplanes under the "777X programme." It found that the fact that this tax rate would be lost if Boeing used wings produced outside of Washington State, even if it maintained production of such wings in Washington State, made the programme contingent upon the use of wings made in Washington State.

On this basis the Panel concluded that the United States had acted inconsistently with its WTO obligations by violating Article 3.1(b), and by necessary implication, Article 3.2 of the SCM Agreement. Notably, in respect of "prohibited subsidies," the SCM Agreement mandates the Panel to rule that such a subsidy should be withdrawn without delay. Consequently, the Panel recommended the United States withdraw the subsidy without delay and within 90 days.11 The Panel refrained from making suggestions concerning steps that the United States could take in order to implement the Panel's recommendation.

Relevance of the Findings in the Panel Report

The importance of the Panel report in US – Tax Incentives is twofold. First, the Panel report presents a new interpretation of Article 3 of the SCM Agreement relating to the conditionality of a subsidy scheme upon the use of domestic over imported goods. Considering that this is the first time in the Airbus-Boeing saga that the existence of prohibited subsidies has been established, it will be interesting to see whether, and if so how, the United States will give effect to the Panel's recommendation. Second, the Panel report presents the next chapter in the long-running Airbus-Boeing saga that is being written in the WTO dispute settlement system. It is expected that this Panel report will also be appealed, adding to the long list of disputes over subsidies in the large civil aircraft sector that are being fought out in Geneva.

Footnotes

1 Panel Report,United States – Conditional Tax Incentives for Large Civil Aircraft,WT/DS487//R, 28 November, 2016 (hereinafter:US – Tax Incentives). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/487r_e.pdf

2 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.3.

3 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.2. The measures are described in detail in paras. 7.17-7.26.

4 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.157.

5 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.160.

6 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.161.

7 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.163. The Panel itself acknowledged this and considered that it is "not precluded from using the same factual elements" for determining the existence of both elements of a subsidy.

8 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, paras. 7.202-7.225.

9 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.170.

10 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 7.315.

11 Panel Report,US – Tax Incentives, para. 8.6.

Originally published December 6, 2016

Learn more about our International Trade practice.

Visit us at mayerbrown.com

Mayer Brown is a global legal services provider comprising legal practices that are separate entities (the "Mayer Brown Practices"). The Mayer Brown Practices are: Mayer Brown LLP and Mayer Brown Europe – Brussels LLP, both limited liability partnerships established in Illinois USA; Mayer Brown International LLP, a limited liability partnership incorporated in England and Wales (authorized and regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority and registered in England and Wales number OC 303359); Mayer Brown, a SELAS established in France; Mayer Brown JSM, a Hong Kong partnership and its associated entities in Asia; and Tauil & Chequer Advogados, a Brazilian law partnership with which Mayer Brown is associated. "Mayer Brown" and the Mayer Brown logo are the trademarks of the Mayer Brown Practices in their respective jurisdictions.

© Copyright 2016. The Mayer Brown Practices. All rights reserved.

This Mayer Brown article provides information and comments on legal issues and developments of interest. The foregoing is not a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter covered and is not intended to provide legal advice. Readers should seek specific legal advice before taking any action with respect to the matters discussed herein.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions