United States: The Minimum Wage In 2017: A Coast-To-Coast Compliance Challenge

Minimum-wage-related actions in 2016 will create challenges for employers starting in 2017. Although 2016 was not necessarily a record year for passage of state minimum wage laws in general, it did break ground concerning the number of tiered and/or regional minimum wage laws enacted. This year was also notable in that Iowa joined the list of states with local minimum wage laws. Moreover, unlike 2015, when consumer prices decreased and minimum wage rates stalled in various locations, 2016 has seen an increase in the consumer price index (CPI) in each jurisdiction. States and localities that review minimum wage rates based on the CPI have, therefore, increased them. Additionally, voters in four states and one city approved ballot measures increasing their minimum wage. This article discusses this year's minimum wage events that will have an impact from 2017 on.

Overview of State Minimum Wage Increases

For 2017, eight states must examine and may increase the minimum wage: Alaska, Florida, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Jersey, Ohio, and South Dakota.1 Also, to date, 12 state legislatures, along with voters in four states, have enacted laws or passed ballot measures increasing the minimum wage and/or changing the minimum cash wage and maximum tip credit for tipped employees in 2017: Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington State.

Additionally, numerous states have already scheduled minimum wage rate changes for future years:

  • 2018: 12 state-level jurisdictions have scheduled minimum wage rate2 changes (Arizona, California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington State).
  • 2019: eight have changes scheduled (Arizona, California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Maine, New York (New York City Small Employer; Remainder of Downstate & Remainder of State; Fast Food Employee Outside New York City), Oregon, and Washington State).
  • 2020: eight have changes scheduled (Arizona, California, Colorado, District of Columbia, Maine, New York (Remainder of Downstate & Remainder of State; Fast Food Employee Outside New York City), Oregon, and Washington State).
  • 2021: four have changes scheduled (California, New York (Remainder of Downstate & Fast Food Employee Outside New York City), and Oregon).
  • 2022: two have scheduled changes (California and Oregon).
  • 2023: California has scheduled a change for employers with 25 or fewer employees.

Tiered or Regional Minimum Wages: The New Normal?

Until recently, most states used one minimum wage rate statewide. Minnesota and Montana were exceptions with different rates based on employer revenue. Minnesota also had a separate industry-based rate. This began to change in September 2015 when the New York State Department of Labor released its Fast Food Wage Order, setting different minimum wage rates for covered fast food workers inside and outside New York City beginning December 31, 2015.3 In 2016, a surge occurred. In March 2016, Oregon created a three-tier system, setting "general," "urban," and "nonurban" rates.4 On the same day in April 2016, California5 created a two-tier system (based on number of employees), and New York6 created four new minimum wage rates: two in New York City; one in Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties; and another in the remainder of the state. Although it is unlikely the trend will sweep the nation, it does set a precedent, which could be followed elsewhere. Moreover, instituting a geographic region-based minimum wage system could prove a useful tool for state legislators trying to avoid a hodgepodge of local measures while satisfying regional concerns about wage stagnation.

Local Minimum Wage Laws

Local minimum wage laws have increased exponentially in recent years. In 2013, four new laws were enacted.7 2014 saw nine enacted laws.8 Enactment of local laws hit fever pitch in 2015, when 14 local laws were enacted.9 To date, 2016 has tied the record with 14 new laws, mostly in California or Iowa:

Arizona: Flagstaff.

California: Cupertino, Los Altos, Malibu, Pasadena, San Diego, San Leandro, San Mateo, and Santa Monica.10

Illinois: Cook County.11

Iowa: The city of Tiffin, Linn County, Polk County, and Wapello County.12

Interestingly, various localities voted against exploring or instituting a local minimum wage. For example, the West Hollywood, California City Council elected not to explore further a minimum wage ordinance, and the Long Beach, California City Council dropped its proposed ordinance. The Board of Supervisors of Woodbury County, Iowa voted against creating an advisory committee to create a county minimum wage.

Preemption v. Populism

At least 23 states have enacted laws expressly banning local governments from enacting minimum wage laws. For example, in 2016, Idaho's minimum wage statute was amended to prohibit local minimum wage laws and the North Carolina minimum wage statutory scheme was amended to provide that state law generally superseded and preempted any local measure regulating compensation, e.g., wage levels, wage payment, etc. Before these new preemption laws, neither Idaho nor North Carolina had a local minimum wage law that covered private employers.

However, cities and citizens have begun to push back. For example, Miami Beach, Florida enacted a local minimum wage law that is set to take effect January 1, 2018, even though a state law arguably preempts local minimum wages. The city contends the state constitution – which implemented the state minimum wage – permits a local minimum wage. Also, a legal challenge has been filed concerning Arizona's preemption law, the result of which will impact the recently-passed local minimum wage ballot measure in Flagstaff.

Various other challenges have made, or are making their way, through the courts. On October 6, 2016, the Missouri Supreme Court heard oral arguments involving the City of St. Louis's minimum wage ordinance and a Missouri preemption law enacted in response to – and only days before – the local law. At the other end of the litigation spectrum, litigants in a case pitting the Birmingham, Alabama minimum wage ordinance against the state's preemption law – like with Missouri, enacted as a direct response to the Birmingham law – are battling in federal court about whether the case will proceed past the dismissal stage. On October 20, 2016, the Kentucky Supreme Court ruled that Louisville-Jefferson County's minimum wage conflicted with the state minimum wage law and was invalid. The conclusion reached should apply equally to Lexington-Fayette County's minimum wage law, meaning there are no longer any generally-applicable local minimum wage laws impacting private employers in the Bluegrass State.

What Happened at the Polls?13

Voters approved state minimum wage increases in Arizona,14 Colorado, Maine, and Washington State. All initiatives set multi-year increases from 2017 through 2020, with annual adjustments in 2021 and subsequent years. Moreover, for all intents and purposes, Maine set the minimum cash wage tipped employees must be paid through 2024: in 2018 and each subsequent year, the wage for tipped employees will increase by $1 per hour until it equals the generally-applicable minimum wage rate, at which time the tip credit will be eliminated.

Although Arizona, Colorado, and Maine all set a $12 minimum wage for 2020, these states will take different approaches in reaching that number. Arizona will use two 50-cent increases per year followed by a $1 increase ($10, $10.50, $11, $12). Colorado will use a 90-cent per year increase structure ($9.30; $10.20; $11.10; $12). Maine will increase its minimum wage $1 per year ($9; $10; $11; $12). Of the four states, Washington State set the highest 2020 minimum rate using two 50-cent increases followed by a $1.50 increase ($11; $11.50; $12; $13.50).

Flagstaff, Arizona was the only local minimum wage ballot measure at the general election. As noted, whether the ordinance is valid remains to be seen. If the courts strike down the state preemption law, Flagstaff will be on its way to at least a $15-per-hour minimum wage by 2021. Initially, the Flagstaff law uses a July 1 start date (in 2017), but eventually aligns with the state's January 1 adjustment date in 2018 and future years. The law sets the minimum wage at the greater of the preset local rate or the state minimum wage plus $2. Because voters approved increases to the state minimum wage in coming years, the applicable rate will be the state rate plus $2 ($12.50; $13; $14). Absent a significant change in the CPI between 2019 and 2020, the local rate in 2021 will be $15. Also, like Maine's law, the Flagstaff law gradually reduces the tip credit until it is eliminated in 2026.

However, not all minimum-wage-related ballot measures passed. South Dakotans voted down a ballot measure that would have allowed employers to pay non-tipped employees under age 18 less than the state minimum wage. In Berkeley, California, two measures failed to pass, but the result was expected. Shortly before the election, the city council passed a measure that amended the existing minimum wage. Its goal was to compromise on changes, as both the council and wage advocates put competing measures on the ballot. After the council adopted the changes, both sides advocated for citizens to vote down both measures.

Suggestions for Employers

In light of the various changes, employers may consider any or all of the following:

Implementing an effective system of monitoring minimum wage increases at all levels.

Ensuring non-exempt employees – tipped and non-tipped – are paid at least the minimum wage (and that the minimum wage is paid separately for each hour of work in jurisdictions that require such strict compliance).

If operating in a state that has a 7(i) exemption (the so-called "retail sales exemption") or an exempt employee salary basis component that uses the state minimum wage, ensure wage requirements are satisfied.

Confirming, in applicable states, that overtime-exempt white collar employees are paid at least the minimum wage.

Updating minimum wage posters.

Informing employees about their new rate(s) before the employees perform work under the new rates.

Training HR, payroll, and managerial employees on increases, posting, and notice requirements, and how to respond to employee inquiries concerning wage rate changes.

For New York employers in particular, ensuring that processes are in place to track the accurate amount of tips received by tipped employees.

State and/or Local Minimum Wage Increases in 2017

Below are the minimum wage rate changes for non-exempt employees in 2017. In certain jurisdictions, tipped employees may be paid differently if all applicable requirements are met. Essentially, an employer can count tips a covered employee receives for purposes of paying that employee the hourly minimum wage. Depending on the jurisdiction, either a minimum cash wage is set and the maximum tip credit is the difference between the minimum wage and minimum cash wage, or vice versa. In these jurisdictions, if an employee's cash wage plus tips received equal the minimum wage, an employer's minimum wage obligation has been satisfied. However, if the cash wage plus tips does not equal the minimum wage, then an employer must pay the employee the difference.

Alaska

Arizona

Arkansas

California



Colorado

Connecticut

District of Columbia

Florida

Hawaii

Illinois

Iowa

Maryland

Maine

Massachusetts

Michigan

Missouri

Montana

Nevada

New Mexico


New Jersey

New York20

Generally

Tips

The New York State labor department has proposed amending its minimum wage orders to account for all the new types of minimum wage rates that apply throughout the state. The below information is limited to what the numbers will be if the proposal is adopted.

Generally: If an employee's weekly tip average is less than the Low amount, a tip credit cannot be claimed. If an employee's weekly tip average is between the Low and High amounts, the tip credit cannot exceed the Low amount. If an employee's weekly tip average equals or exceeds the High amount, the tip credit cannot exceed the High amount.

Hospitality Industry (Service Employee): A service employee must receive a wage of at least the hourly Cash Wage (CW), and a tip credit cannot exceed the hourly tip credit rate (TC), provided an employee's weekly tip average at least the hourly Tip Threshold (TT) and the total of tips received plus wages equals or exceeds the basic minimum hourly rate (TT(R) is the tip threshold for resort hotel service employees).

Hospitality Industry (Food Service Worker): A food service worker must receive a wage of at least the hourly Cash Wage (CW), and a tip credit cannot exceed the below-specified hourly rate (TC) provided the total of tips received plus the wages equals or exceeds the hourly Total rate (MW). A tip credit is not permitted for fast food employees.

Ohio

Oregon

Rhode Island

South Dakota

Vermont

Washington State

Footnotes

1 Other states will annually examine their rates in future years: Minnesota (2018); Michigan and Vermont (2019); District of Columbia, New York (one type of rate only), Arizona, Maine, and Washington State (2021); Oregon (2023); California (2024).

2 In addition to scheduled increases noted, Maine also has set the minimum cash wage for qualified tipped employees in 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024.

3 See George Pauta and Stefanie Kastrinsky, New York "Supersizes" the Minimum Wage for Certain Fast Food Employees, Littler Insight (Sept. 29, 2015).

4 See Jennifer Warberg, Historic Minimum Wage Increase in Oregon, Littler ASAP (Mar. 4, 2016) & Oregon's Bureau of Labor and Industries Issues Minimum Wage Rules, Littler ASAP (June 17, 2016).

5 See Christopher Cobey and Sebastian Chilco, California Raises its Minimum Wage and Expands Paid Sick Leave, Littler Insight (Apr. 4, 2016).

6 See Stephen Fuchs, Minimum Wage Increases in New York: What Employers Should Know, Littler Insight (Apr. 18, 2016)

7 San Jose, CA; Montgomery County, MD; Bernalillo County, NM (Unincorporated); and SeaTac, WA.

8 Berkeley & Oakland & Richmond & Sunnyvale, CA; Chicago, IL; Prince George's County, MD; Las Cruces and Santa Fe County, NM (Unincorporated); and Seattle, WA.

9 Birmingham, AL (Preempted by state law immediately after, and currently subject of a legal challenge); El Cerrito, Los Angeles, Los Angeles County (Unincorporated), Mountain View, Palo Alto, and Santa Clara, CA; Johnson County, IA; Louisville-Jefferson County & Lexington-Fayette Urban County, KY; Bangor & Portland, ME; St. Louis, MO (Preempted by state law immediately after, and currently subject of a legal challenge); and Tacoma, WA. New York City's Fast Food Wage Order is excluded from the count because it was a local rate set by state law.

10 See Robert Blumberg, Maria Harrington, and Shiva Davoudian, Santa Monica Jumps on the Minimum Wage and Sick Leave Bandwagon, Littler Insight (Feb. 18, 2016).

11 Currently, many question whether the county had the legal authority to enact the measure. Additionally, many local officials have discussed passing measures to remove work performed in their cities from coverage under the county law.

12 Local rates in Oregon are excluded from the county because they are set by state law.

13 Petitioners were unsuccessful in persuading courts to put minimum wage measures on the November ballot in Minneapolis, Minnesota and Cleveland, Ohio (though the Cleveland City Council eventually agreed to put a measure on the May 2017 ballot).

14 See Neil Alexander and Lindsay Schafer, New Arizona Law Provides Minimum Wage Increases And Paid Sick Time, Littler Insight (Nov. 15, 2016).

15 Before the election, the state labor department issued Proposed Colorado Minimum Wage Order 33. Given the approved ballot measure provides for a higher minimum wage rate, and postpones the ability of the department to annually adjust the minimum wage until 2021, we expect the department to withdraw the proposal.

16 The ordinance provides: "For purposes of determining whether an employee of a restaurant, hotel, motel, inn or cabin, who customarily and regularly receives more than thirty dollars a month in tips ('tipped wage employees') is receiving the minimum hourly wage rate prescribed in this section, the amount paid the employee by the employer shall be deemed to be increased on account of the tips by an amount determined by the employer not to exceed $5.00 per hour at every Polk County Minimum Wage level. Barring anything to the contrary in Iowa or Federal law (which limitation under current Iowa and Federal law is considered to be a credit and expressed as 40 percent of the minimum wage) employers are obligated to pay employees any hourly wage amount less than the Polk County Minimum Wage." A Polk County representative informally stated recommendations would be made to amend the ordinance to clarify the second sentence's meaning and interplay with the first sentence before the ordinance takes effect in April 2017.

17 See Rick Roskelley & Kathryn Blakey, Nevada Supreme Court Makes Three Major Decisions On Nevada's Minimum Wage Laws, Littler Insight (Oct. 28, 2016).

18 Although the minimum wage ordinance requires the minimum wage to be adjusted on January 1, the county has not stuck to that date and minimum wage increases in 2015 and 2016 both occurred on January 26.

19 Although the living wage ordinance suggests annual adjustments should occur on January 1, the city has regularly had the new minimum wage rate take effect on March 1.

20 New York State has also proposed changing the minimum salary exempt executive and administrative employees must be paid. See Emma Fursland and Bruce Millman, Proposed Amendment to New York State Wage Orders Set To Substantially Raise Salary Requirements For Exempt Employees, Littler Insight (Nov. 1, 2016).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Sebastian Chilco
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions