United States: Ending The 10b-5 Hold-up: Aéropostale Rejects Debtor's Attack On Traders

In an August 2016 decision in the Aéropostale bankruptcy case,1 the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that allegations of insider trading did not justify equitable subordination and were not "cause" to deny a credit bid. The decision helps bridge the gap between the treatment of insider trading allegations in bankruptcy court and their treatment everywhere else. If followed, the decision would also eliminate the sometimes extortionate practices employed by issuers, under the guise of enforcing the anti-fraud provisions of the securities laws, to frustrate the exercise of creditor rights in the bankruptcy process.

For more than six decades, it has been black letter law outside of bankruptcy court that an issuer cannot sue those trading in its own securities under Securities Exchange Act § 10(b).2 Only a purchaser or seller in the class of traded securities has standing to pursue a private right of action under Rule 10b-5.3 The classic Supreme Court case of Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores remains the law of the land in this regard, despite suggestions that its holding be modified to allow issuers and others who have not traded in the securities to pursue non-monetary relief under the Rule.4

In bankruptcy cases, however, debtors and other parties seeking to extort concessions from bondholders often use accusations of insider trading to threaten sanctions against the traders.5 These allegations are used for pure tactical advantage. The debtor has not been harmed. The shareholders have not been harmed. Neither would have standing outside of bankruptcy court to sue under 10b-5. Invariably, no bondholder who might have been harmed – no buyer or seller of the (allegedly) improperly traded security – appears to complain.6

Yet the mere allegation of insider trading – whether founded or not – threatens potential civil and even criminal sanction, which in the contemporary legal environment can have disastrous consequences for funds and other traders.

This happened most notoriously in Washington Mutual,7 where the court initially held that a committee of equityholders had standing to complain of alleged insider trading by bondholders. This initial holding led to five months of litigation and a settlement providing material value to the shareholders on the condition that the court vacate its original holding so as to eliminate the precedent.8

Aéropostale is a useful corrective against this behavior. In Aéropostale, funds together with their affiliates, including one entity that was a supplier to the debtors (collectively the funds and related entities, the "Lender Related Entities"):

  • agreed to supply a substantial percentage of the debtor's inventory, conditioned on minimum liquidity,
  • extended secured credit to the debtors, subject to the same liquidity condition,
  • held material amounts of the debtor's stock, and
  • had representatives on the board.

Aéropostale's liquidity cratered, and certain of the Lender Related Entities froze their credit line, disposing of their stock at the same time. Aéropostale and certain subsidiaries (the "debtors") filed for Chapter 11 and moved to sell substantially all of their assets. The debtors sought to equitably subordinate the claims of the Lender Related Entities on the grounds that certain of the related funds had sold their stock in violation of Rule 10b-5, and argued that such alleged violation constituted "cause" to deny the funds the right to credit bid their credit-line claims.

Bankruptcy Judge Lane ruled against the debtors on both points. On equitable subordination, he held that insider trading was not sufficient to justify equitable subordination without "evidence in the record to establish tangible harm to the debtors or the creditors sufficient of equitable subordination." The court reasoned:  

The Court does not disagree that ... a company has an interest in its confidential information ... However [the cases cited] ... do not address the type of harm that bankruptcy courts consider in an equitable subordination analysis - whether the misconduct "resulted in injury to the creditors of the bankrupt or conferred an unfair advantage on the claimant."9 ...

The Debtors argue that by selling their stock in Aéropostale, [the Lender Related Entities] undermined the integrity and public's regard of the Debtors ... But this is not the type of harm that courts are concerned about when determining whether to equitably subordinate a claim. The cases cited by the Debtors ... focus on the integrity of the marketplace and whether there has been harm from a public policy point of view and are thus not relevant to the inquiry before this Court. Once again, there has been no evidence of a harm here that could serve as a basis for relief in this bankruptcy case.10

Judge Lane also questioned whether the Lender Related Entities did in fact "misappropriate" the debtors' non-public information when, in fact, the debtors had permitted their own officers to trade during the same period with the same information.11

Finally, Judge Lane rejected the debtors' argument that insider trading constituted "cause" sufficient to deny the Lender Related Entities the right to credit bid their secured claims under Section 363(k). There was no allegation that the funds had obtained any unfair advantage over the sale process, and the evidence showed that the funds had not interfered in the sale process. Insider trading was therefore irrelevant.12

It is to be hoped that other courts pay attention to Aéropostale. If insider trading provides no cause of action to issuers outside Chapter 11, then, absent evidence of damage to the debtor, insider trading should not provide any cause of action inside Chapter 11.13 The Supreme Court limited suits under Rule 10b-5 to purchasers and sellers to avoid other plaintiffs, including issuers, from generating "largely groundless claim[s] ... representing an in terrorem increment of the settlement value."14 Those concerns apply equally to the use of insider trading allegations by uninjured debtors and other non-parties to the relevant trades or trading markets.15/p>


1 In re Aéropostale, Inc., 555 B.R. 369 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016).
2 Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp., 193 F.2d 461 (2nd Cir. 1952), endorsed in Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores, 421 U.S. 723, 731-48 (1975) ("Blue Chip Stamps").
3 An issuer may sue only if it itself was a purchaser or seller of the relevant security. Blue Chip Stamps, 421 U.S. at 738.
4 See Chaffee, Beyond Blue Chip: Issuer Standing to Seek Injunctive Relief Under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 Without the Purchase or Sale of a Security, 36 Seton Hall L. Rev. 1135 (2006) (arguing that issuers should be allowed to seek an injunction notwithstanding Blue Chip Stamps).
5 In the Chapter 11 case of Service Merchandise, Inc., the debtor accused a committee member of trading on inside information in retaliation for the creditor's objection to the debtor's motion to extend exclusivity.  The debtor never alleged any damage or, indeed, how the inside information could have been material, since prices declined dramatically after the trades. In the Chapter 11 reorganization of Todd Shipyards, the debtor tried to lever its largest creditor into concessions by accusing the creditor of using "material" non-public information to buy debentures, even though the so-called material information was negative.
6 Our searches have disclosed no reported opinion dealing with a securities claim brought by one bondholder against a bondholder in the same class for insider trading in that class.  There are a few – very few – SEC enforcement actions.
7 In re Washington Mutual, Inc. 461 B.R. 200, 254-67 (Bankr. D. Del. 2011).
8 In re Washington Mutual, Inc., 2012 Bankr. LEXIS 895 at *52-59 (Feb. 2013); see especially *59: "The portions of the September Order and September Opinion that the Motion seeks to vacate are fact-specific, unique to this bankruptcy, and are non-binding on other courts."
9The quotation is from Benjamin v. Diamond (In re Mobile Steel Corp.), 563 F.2d 692, 700 (5th Cir. 1977).
10 In re Aéropostale, Inc., 555 B.R. 369 at *109-110, text between notes 26 & 27 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2016).
11 Id. at *113, text at note 27.
12 Id. at *117-23, text between notes 29 and 31.
13 The Third Circuit, in Citicorp Venture Capital, Ltd. v. Committee of Creditors (In re Papercraft), 160 F.3rd 982 (3rd Cir. 1998) and 323 F.3rd 228 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 540 U.S. 825 (2003), subordinated claims acquired by a major shareholder using non-public information obtained by its representative on the debtor's board of directors. Judge Lane properly distinguished Papercraft on the ground that the bankruptcy court found that the shareholder's claim buying had damaged the debtor and provided the shareholder/creditor with unfair advantage over other creditors.
14 Blue Chip Stamps, 421 U.S. 723, 741 (1975).
15 See Viking Associates v. Drewes, 120 F.3rd 98, 102 n.4 (8th Cir. 1998).  In Viking, insiders – the debtor's children – withheld information from a Chapter 7 trustee while they bought up all claims against the debtor's estate.  The Eighth Circuit reversed the bankruptcy court's order rescinding the claims purchases. "The wronged parties could have objected [to the transfers] to the Bankruptcy Court, or could have pursued their remedies under nonbankruptcy law, by suing to rescind the transfer of the claims in any court ... with jurisdiction.  The claims transferors have taken neither of these steps. We think people should be allowed to decide for themselves whether to seek redress for an alleged injury."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.