United States: Compelling Redemption Of Notes With A Make-Whole Premium As A Remedy For Breach

Much has been written concerning the liability of an issuer to pay a make-whole premium for debt that has been accelerated in bankruptcy. See Debt Dialogue, August 2016 (" No Turnover of the Make-Whole Amount in the EFH Bankruptcy") A recent case, Wilmington Savings Fund Society v. Cash America International, (S.D.N.Y. September 19, 2016), addressed a slightly different but related issue. Where an event of default is continuing under an indenture, may the trustee compel the issuer to redeem the debt and pay a make-whole premium, rather than accelerate and receive par? The court's answer in the circumstances of the case was yes, so long as the default may be deemed voluntary.

In May 2013, Cash America International issued $300 million worth of notes in a private placement. The indenture trustee was Wilmington Savings Fund Society (WSFS). Among the covenants of the indenture was a prohibition against Cash America's disposing of its properties. That prohibition had a number of exceptions, one of which allowed Cash America to engage in disposition transactions if "the aggregate book value of the properties disposed of does not exceed" 10% of the company's "consolidated total assets."

In 2014, Cash America announced that its board of directors approved a spin-off of its subsidiary Enova International. Cash America was in the business of providing secured non-recourse lending, and Enova conducted the online aspect of the business. In October 2014, a noteholder sent a letter to Cash America warning that the spin-off would violate the provisions of the indenture prohibiting dispositions, and suggesting that Cash America should redeem the notes together with a make-whole premium rather than violate indenture. Cash America responded by saying that the spin-off would not breach the indenture, and that if there were a breach, the noteholders' sole remedy would be acceleration. Shortly thereafter, Cash America effectuated the spin-off by conveying 80% of the interest in Enova to its shareholders.

The court first addressed the question of whether the Enova spin-off constituted a breach of the indenture, which turned on whether the spin-off qualified for the exception where the aggregate book value of the transferred properties did not exceed 10% of consolidated total assets. Cash America maintained that the aggregate book value of the Enova shares should be calculated by taking assets minus liabilities, i.e., shareholder equity, in which case the transaction would not have constituted a breach. The court sided with WSFS in that for the purposes of determining book value, what mattered was the aggregate book value of the assets of Enova. The court's conclusion was compelled by the plain language of the indenture, which read, "[f]or purposes of determining the book value of property constituting capital stock or similar equity interests of the subsidiaries disposed of provided in [the relevant covenant], such book value shall be deemed to be the aggregate book value of all assets of the subsidiary that shall have issued such capital stock or similar equity interest." Cash America argued from the generally accepted meaning of "book value" in the case law, which the court understandably found unpersuasive.

The court next turned to the question of remedy and specifically whether the noteholders were entitled to recoup not only the principal amount of their notes, but also the make-whole premium prescribed in the indenture. The Cash America indenture required the issuer to pay upon redemption an amount equal to the sum of the present values of the remaining principal and interest on the notes being redeemed, discounted at the Treasury Rate (as defined), plus 50 basis points, effectively providing for a make-whole premium. Cash America, as noted, maintained that the prepayment premium was irrelevant to a circumstance of breach, because in that case the only remedy of the trustee and the noteholders was to accelerate the notes and receive payment at par. The court disagreed, placing reliance upon the well-known decision of the Second Circuit in Sharon Steel Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 691 F.2d 1039 (2d Cir. 1982). In that case, the issuer, UV Industries, Inc., disposed of its assets in piecemeal fashion to a variety of buyers under a predetermined plan of liquidation. The last such disposition was to Sharon Steel, which assumed UV Industries' obligations under a series of indentures, in accordance with the successor obligor provisions of those debt documents. The noteholders challenged the characterization of Sharon Steel as the successor issuer, maintaining that UV Industries had breached the successor obligor provisions of the indentures with this maneuver. Both the district court and the Second Circuit ruled in favor of the noteholders. On the issue of remedies, the Second Circuit held the "acceleration of the provisions of the indentures are explicitly permissive and not exclusive of other remedies," and that there was "no bar ... to [the lender] seeking specific performance of the redemption provisions where the debtor causes the debentures to become due and payable by its voluntary actions."

As in Sharon Steel, the Cash America indenture had both a redemption clause requiring payment of the make-whole premium and a customary provision for acceleration upon the occurrence of an event of default. Also as in Sharon Steel, the acceleration provisions in the Cash America indenture were permissive and not exclusive of other remedies, and the default was due to the voluntary action of the issuer. Finding Sharon Steel controlling, the court held that the trustee was entitled to seek specific performance and compel Cash America to redeem the notes together with the prepayment make-whole.

In rebutting a variety of arguments advanced by Cash America, the court rejected the contention that Sharon Steel required a showing of bad faith, as where the issuer triggers an acceleration in order to avoid paying the redemption premium. The court found no such requirement in Sharon Steel and held that the only criteria of relevance was whether the issuer by its voluntary action occasioned the event of default.

Finally, the court rejected Cash America's argument that requiring payment of the premium was inequitable, would effectively destroy the use of acceleration clauses and would "upend the nation's debt markets." The court found that Cash America had prior notice that Enova spin-off could constitute a breach of the indenture. Also, the court observed, Cash America could have foreclosed the application of Sharon Steel due to voluntary breaches of the indenture by drafting provisions to the contrary.


In a nutshell, Cash America stands for the proposition that one of the remedies available to noteholders and trustees for an issuer's conscious breach of an indenture is redemption, and that such a redemption may be deemed voluntary for purposes of payment of a make-whole or other redemption premium. If the holding stands up on the appeal that is sure to follow, trustees and noteholders would be afforded another weapon in their arsenal of enforcement against actual or prospective breaches of indentures. Also, if the movement toward redrafting of acceleration clauses in the post-Momentive Performance Materials era is any guide (see Debt Dialogue, above), we might well see similar developments codifying the Cash America decision in the express language of indentures of the future.

For the moment, issuers, noteholders and trustees are advised to take heed of the additional remedial optionality being offered by Cash America. Not only might the Cash America alternative entitle holders to a make-whole premium where none would be available on straight acceleration, but the deemed redemption might not trigger cross-acceleration of other series of debt, which would ordinarily force the issuer into bankruptcy. Finally, the decision showcases the utility and efficacy of noteholder communications to an issuer warning of potential or threatened breaches. By sending such a notice in this case, the noteholder assured a balance of equities that tilted in its favor. Left open for another day and decision are the precise contours of those indenture breaches that are considered "voluntary" and therefore may give rise to a deemed redemption under the jurisprudence of Sharon Steel and Cash America.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

In association with
Related Topics
Related Articles
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.


The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.


Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions