ARTICLE
24 October 2016

Annulled Commisa v Pemex Arbitration Award Enforced

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
In a recent decision, Corporacion Mexicana de Matenimiento Integral, S De RL De CV v Pemex-Exploracion y Produccion, No 13-4022 (2d Cir Aug 2, 2016), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court decision recognising an arbitral award that had been set aside by a court in Mexico, where the arbitration was seated.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration

What was the background to the decision?

In a recent decision, Corporacion Mexicana de Matenimiento Integral, S De RL De CV v Pemex-Exploracion y Produccion, No 13-4022 (2d Cir Aug 2, 2016), the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed a district court decision recognising an arbitral award that had been set aside by a court in Mexico, where the arbitration was seated. In doing so, the court added to a small but growing list of international decisions en-forcing annulled awards. At the same time, the court reinforced a restrictive approach to the issue of enforc-ing annulled awards not seen in decisions by courts from other jurisdictions.

Originally published by LexisPSL Arbitration, October 10, 2016

Click here to download the full article

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More