ARTICLE
3 October 2016

What The Fed Circ. Says About IPR Estoppel

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
The inter partes review estoppel provision says that a petitioner in an IPR that results in a final written decision on a patent claim may not assert validity in a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office proceeding,,,
United States Intellectual Property

The inter partes review estoppel provision (35 U.S.C. § 315(e)) says that a petitioner (or real party in interest) in an IPR that results in a final written decision on a patent claim may not assert validity in a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office proceeding, a civil action, or before the U.S. International Trade Commission with respect to that claim "on any ground that the petitioner raised or reasonably could have raised during the inter partes review."

Click here to continue reading.

Originally published by Law360.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More