United States: Third Circuit Jump-Starts Class Action, Holding That An Indirect Purchaser Can Bring Federal Antitrust Claims As A Direct Purchaser Based On Assignment Of The Claims Even Without Consideration

On September 15, 2016, the Third Circuit jump-started a federal antitrust class action involving truck transmissions, holding that a direct purchaser's assignment of its federal antitrust claims to an indirect purchaser is valid as long as the assignment was written and express—even if there was no consideration for the assignment. The Third Circuit also held that a proposed class representative's motion to intervene is presumptively timely if made before class certification. Wallach, et al. v. Eaton Corp., et al., No. 15-3320 (Sept. 15, 2016).

The named plaintiff, Tauro Brothers Trucking Group, was a purchaser of "class 8" build-to-order trucks from resellers of trucks manufactured by OEM truck manufacturers. The OEMs, in turn, bought various components for the trucks they manufactured from parts manufacturers like Eaton Corp. Eaton was alleged to be a monopolist in the supply of truck transmissions, and to have conspired with OEMs to maintain that status unlawfully by eliminating from the market a would-be competitor in the manufacture of transmissions, ZF Meritor. The result was alleged to be higher prices paid by purchasers such as Tauro.

Tauro was a direct purchaser from the resellers of trucks, but only an indirect purchaser from the OEMs and Eaton Corp. One of the resellers from which Tauro purchased trucks expressly assigned its direct purchaser claims to Tauro, and Tauro was the named plaintiff in a purported class action against Eaton and certain of the OEMs. Defendants opposed class certification, arguing that Tauro lacked direct purchaser standing under Illinois Brick v. Illinois, 431 U.S. 720 (1977), because it was not itself a direct purchaser of the transmissions, and the assignment to Tauro from its supplier was invalid because Tauro provided the supplier with no consideration for the assignment. And, defendants argued, if Tauro had no claim then class certification had to be denied for lack of a named class representative. The district court accepted defendants' argument, dismissed Tauro for lack of standing, and denied the motion for class certification.1

The Third Circuit reversed. The court noted that it "is beyond dispute that a validly assigned antitrust claim can give direct purchaser standing to an indirect purchaser." Slip. op. at 10, n.5. It emphasized that the assignment at issue was express, and the only issue was whether the assignment of a federal antitrust claim must also reflect consideration to be valid. The court rejected defendants' argument that federal common law was inapplicable, as well as their argument that a 50-state survey was required to determine federal common law on the issue. Instead, the court turned to the Restatement of Contracts as a "starting point for fashioning rules of federal common law . . .," recognizing the need to "confirm that the proposed rule comports with the underlying purpose and goals of the federal antitrust laws as outlined in Illinois Brick." Slip. op. at 23. The court found that under the Restatement an assignment is valid as long as it is written and express, even without consideration, and that requiring consideration could potentially undermine Illinois Brick by discouraging private enforcement of the antitrust laws. Accordingly, the Third Circuit held that "consideration is not required under federal common law to give effect to an otherwise express assignment." Slip. op. at 28.

The Third Circuit also addressed whether two pre-certification FRCP 24 motions to intervene by proposed class representatives were timely. Tauro was the sole plaintiff, and when it became clear that defendants sought to dismiss its claim based on the purportedly invalid assignment, counsel for Tauro filed motions to intervene on behalf of two new direct purchasers. The district court denied the motions to intervene as untimely, concluding that although they were filed only two months after the motion to dismiss Tauro, discovery sought months earlier should have put direct purchasers on notice and triggered intervention motions at that time. The Third Circuit disagreed and reversed the district court's ruling. The court noted that the Third Ciruit had previously recognized that a motion to intervene is presumptively timely if made after certification but before the opt-out deadline. And it agreed with plaintiffs that the rationale for the presumption after certification but before the opt-out deadline applies with "equal force in the pre-certification context." Slip. op. at 33-34.

Rather than simply remand to determine whether the presumption should apply, the Third Circuit analyzed on its own the applicable three-factor timeliness test: "(1) the stage of the proceeding; (2) the prejudice that delay may cause the parties; and (3) the reason for the delay." Slip. op. at 30 (citations omitted). It found that the first factor weighed against a finding of timeliness in light of several years of litigation, extensive briefing, and discovery that already had been completed. But the court also found that the other two factors—the reason for delay and prejudice to the parties—pointed "decisively" in the other direction. The court rejected defendants' argument that the fact that counsel for Tauro was also counsel for the two proposed intervenors was sufficient to put the intervenors on notice, because defendants had not challenged the validity of the assignment during the preceding five years and, in general, litigants cannot be required to "divine" the intent behind discovery requests. The Third Circuit also concluded that there was no prejudice because there was no meaningful delay.

The Third Circuit's decision contains several important takeaways:

  • The Third Circuit repeated its admonition in Hartig that a challenge to antitrust standing is properly brought under FRCP 12(b)(6) and not FRCP 12(b)(1).
  • The validity of an assignment of federal antitrust claims can be analyzed under federal common law, and at least in the Third Circuit courts can use the Restatement as the starting point for the analysis, informed by the purposes and goals of the antitrust laws.
  • Federal direct purchaser antitrust claims can be assigned as long as the assignment is written and express, even if no consideration was provided for the assignment.
  • A class member's motion to intervene before class certification is presumptively timely, but that presumption can be rebutted.
  • For purposes of the timeliness analysis, class members who seek to intervene as class representatives are not charged with knowing what has happened in discovery even if they are represented by the same counsel who represents the existing named plaintiffs.

Footnotes

1 The Third Circuit cited its recent decision in Hartig Drug. Co. v. Senju Pharm. Co., __ F.3d __, No. 15-3289, 2016 WL 4651381 (3d Cir. Sept. 7, 2016), to point out that the district court mistakenly treated defendants' motion as challenging Article III standing under Rule 12(b)(1) rather than antitrust standing under Rule 12(b)(6). We discussed Hartig in an earlier blog post available here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Events from this Firm
26 Sep 2018, Seminar, Tokyo, Japan

Orrick’s Global Japan Practice is hosting a series of “Orrick Library” seminars to explore legal issues in various fields in Japan as well as the United States, Asia and Europe

26 Sep 2018, Conference, New York, United States

Employment Partner, Mandy Perry and Chair of Orrick's Global Employment Law Practice, Mike Delikat will be participating in the Global Business Protections 2018: International Restrictive Covenants and Confidential Information Conference.

10 Oct 2018, Conference, Florida, United States
Julie Totten is Program Chair of this year’s conference, Lynne Hermle is speaking on women in the courtroom, boardroom, and c-suite, and Erin Connell is speaking on pay equity and pay transparency.

 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions