United States: Copyright Plaintiffs Keep Trying To Topple Empire. Can Proto-Cookie Succeed Where Others Failed?

Last Updated: September 19 2016
Article by Nicole Kinsley

Just in time for the Season 3 premiere, let's take a look back at Empire's year in IP litigation.

Like the fictional Lyon family, which is constantly beset by threats from Feds, old criminal connections, and music business competitors, their show Empire finds itself a regular target for infringement claims. As with any successful show (or family), many people want to claim credit and their own slice of a quite lucrative pie. The folks behind Empire have successfully fended off a number of claims to date in California, but a recent decision in Michigan broke their winning streak, leaving one copyright claim as unresolved as an end-of-season cliffhanger. With more cases pending in New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia, we may soon be able to publish a survey of how each circuit handles copyright motions to dismiss, entirely through the lens of Empire cases.

The first season of the show, a hip hop soap opera of very consciously Shakespearean proportions, styles itself as a modern day King Lear mixed with a healthy dose of over-the-top stereotypes. Lucious Lyon, a music mogul with a criminal past (and present!), tries to decide which of his three sons – bipolar businessman Andre, gay R&B singer Jamal, or impetuous young rapper Hakeem – should inherit his Empire (with a capital "E," since that's what he named his company). Unlike Lear's queen, Lucious' ex-wife Cookie is still very much alive, and recently released from prison. The redoubtable Cookie Lyon, whose own drug earnings financed Empire's founding, is out to reclaim her half the company.

The dazzling drama has hooked viewers. But some thought they recognized source material from someone besides the Bard – namely, themselves.

A California Winning Streak

This year started out with two big wins for the hit Fox show, as the same Central District of California federal judge twice found in its favor. First, in Fox v. Empire Distribution, the judge declared that the show did not infringe the trademark rights of Empire Distribution, a real life music company. Then, in Astor-White v. Strong, the same judge dismissed a copyright infringement claim, explaining that Empire was not at all similar to an earlier script treatment called King Solomon, beyond the high-level, unprotectable idea of a black man rising to power in the music industry and living a lavish lifestyle. The judge also wrote that he was "disappointed that Plaintiff's counsel would so blithely make" the "offensive" claim that a female character in the Plaintiff's script was "substantially similar" to Lucius Lyon's gay son in Empire, because both characters were "associated with the feminine gender."

In July, a different judge from the same California district continued Empire's winning streak in Newt v. Fox. The Court dismissed a case brought by Ron Newt, who describes himself as a "gangsta pimp." Newt claimed that Empire was ripped off from his autobiographical book, screenplay and documentary, which primarily focused on his early life in crime, but also included descriptions of his management of his sons' musical careers. The judge painstakingly evaluated the plot, themes, dialogue, mood, setting, pace, characters, and sequence of events of all four works, and found that none were "substantially similar." All Newt had to offer were random similarities that arose in entirely different contexts, a jumble of unprotectable ideas and standard elements that are expected in any story about crime or the music industry. The unconvincing "similarities" Newt alleged included:

  • Jail time for the main female character (Cookie Lyon did seventeen years, while Newt's "China Doll" was quickly bailed out);
  • Musician sons who wear sunglasses and gold chains (two of superstar Lucious' adult sons have successful solo careers, while Newt's pre-teen and teenage sons formed a singing and dancing group The Newtrons. And does it take a federal judge to explain that a musician wearing gold chains and sunglasses is not original?);
  • The protagonist is broken out of jail by his sons (which the judge correctly noted didn't actually happen in Empire); and
  • What the plaintiff referred to as a "lavish 'pimp' aesthetic" (Empire's plot does not in fact involve actual pimps).

The judge was unimpressed by these arguments, which he promptly booted out of court.

Michigan Breaks the Streak

The most recent – and perhaps most surprising – Empire decision comes from the Eastern District of Michigan, in Eggleston v. Daniels. Fox and its fellow defendants once again sought to dismiss a claim of copyright infringement, but apparently this one will be harder to shake. This suit was brought by Sophia Eggleston, who claims that Cookie Lyon is based on her, as described in her memoir. The decision on the motion to dismiss begins by recounting Eggleston's life story, which involves the music industry only to the extent that she has apparently met some famous musicians. One who has watched both seasons of Empire (like me, because I am a meticulous legal researcher) might be struck by how little Eggleston had in common in with Cookie, who has never shot and killed anyone and certainly hasn't found redemption through a Christian radio show. Eggleston nevertheless claims that the "striking" similarities between her and Cookie include that they both:

  • Wear expensive clothes, are known for vicious insults, profanity and a propensity to slap people (a fairly standard, stock type of character);
  • Have family members who have been murdered, and have put themselves between a loved one and a gun (also fairly commonplace elements in a story involving criminal enterprises);
  • Led gangs (which, unless I blacked out during an episode, Cookie did not);
  • Have a gay family member (which may be true of every person on the planet).

The Court noted that a copyright plaintiff has a relatively high burden (because "copyright infringement lends itself readily to abusive litigation"), and recognized that many of these similarities might be standard, unprotectable clichés, but at the same time noted that the preference in the Sixth Circuit is not to resolve the question of substantial similarity at the motion to dismiss or summary judgment stage. The Court also gave the nod to at least some potential for similarity by mentioning that in both stories, the "gang leaders" are women, which "is not the stock and trade of the average drug gangster potboiler." The Court ultimately found that Eggleston's complaint pled infringement "with adequate specificity to give Defendants notice of the claim against them," so the litigation will go forward. It will be interesting to see how (and how far) this case gets once the Court gets down into the nitty gritty of each character as actually portrayed.

Pennsylvania, New York and Virginia to Come

We will soon get to see other courts address similar cases. Motions to dismiss are due this month in pending Empire cases in E.D. Pennsylvania (Tanksley v. Daniels) and E.D. New York ( Castro v. Cusack).

Motions have already been filed in Levi v. Fox in the Eastern District of Virginia, but notably not by all defendants (Fox answered that complaint rather than seeking to dismiss it). That pro se plaintiff alleges that Empire ripped off his novel, which he attempted to publish while in prison. He says he can prove this because he "has secretly embedded a biblical story" in his novel "so if anyone copied his work, he could sufficiently demonstrate that the infringed material derived from his work."

While other viewers are on the edge of their seats during the September 21 season premiere, waiting to learn the fate of two characters last seen in a near-literal cliffhanger, I'll also be waiting with bated breath to learn if the Virginia judge is persuaded that, "[b]ased on the fact the creators of Empire named Lucious' club, Leviticus, it is obvious they solved the hidden biblical story."

If the drama in court continues to match the drama on screen, we may have an update for you by the season finale.

To view Foley Hoag's Trademark and Copyright Law Blog please click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Events from this Firm
25 Oct 2017, Webinar, Boston, United States

Foley Hoag will present a 60-minute webinar on Wednesday, October 25 at 12:30 pm EDT, offering guidance for in-house counsel regarding the basics of trademark and design protection in the European Union. Attendees will learn about the opportunities and pitfalls to be on the lookout for when looking to secure, protect, and enforce an IP portfolio overseas.

1 Nov 2017, Webinar, Boston, United States

Please join Foley Hoag on Wednesday, November 1, 2017 for a webinar that covers the details of drafting an appropriate arbitration clause for your company’s commercial contracts.

9 Nov 2017, Conference, Waltham, United States

Please join us on Thursday, November 9 at the Westin Waltham Hotel for our quarterly New England M&A Forum, which brings the latest in market trends and recent legal developments to the New England M&A professionals' community.

In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.