ARTICLE
9 September 2016

The Implications Of The Proposed Entrepreneur Rule

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Practice Chair, Susan Cohen was quoted in the Law360 article, Rule for Foreign Startup Founders Seen as Helpful Stopgap in which she explains the nuances of the UCIS's proposed entrepreneur rule.
United States Immigration

Practice Chair, Susan Cohen was quoted in the Law360 article, Rule for Foreign Startup Founders Seen as Helpful Stopgap in which she explains the nuances of the UCIS's proposed entrepreneur rule, which will allow immigrant startup founders to temporarily stay in the U.S. Cohen notes that the rule doesn't provide actual immigration status and clarifies the impact "parole status" will have on the overall visa process. The article provides an overview of the rule and the challenges non-U.S. entrepreneurs may face in meeting the rule's requirements.

Susan Cohen was also quoted in the Bloomberg BNA article, Draft Immigration Rule Would Ease Foreign Entrepreneurs' Entry in which she examines the investment threshold for the proposed entrepreneur rule. The article highlights key components of the rule, such as the two-fold parole period and its requirements, and offers expert insight from various attorneys on the rule's implications.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More