United States: New York's High Court Supports Policyholders On Key Allocation Issues For Long-Tail Claims

Originally published by Anderson Kill's Policyholder Advisor, May/June 2016

New York's highest court recently re­warded policyholders' persistent pres­sure for coverage of "all sums" that their liability insurance companies promised to pay for long-tail environmental and asbes­tos claims. In the Matter of Viking Pump, Inc., 2016 N.Y. LEXIS 1018, 2016 NY Slip Op 03413 (May 3, 2016), the New York Court of Appeals acknowledged that its prior pro rata ruling in Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y. v. Allstate Insur­ance Co., 9 8 N.Y.2d 208 (2002) was p remised on a "legal fiction." The court had stated in Con Ed that the 2002 decision "[c]learly . . . is not the last word," yet since then, insurance companies sought unconditional surrender in long-tail coverage cases under New York law. In many instances, insurance compa­nies affirmatively sued policyholders in New York, seeking to slice and dice liability into small annual amounts over the duration of a loss that would never reach excess layers, and claiming that the policyholder had to exhaust decades of primary coverage before collect­ing excess insurance in any year.

Viking Pump put an end to that shell game, as requested by the policyholders in that action and by a brief that the court accepted from Anderson Kill on behalf of a group of amici curiae, includ­ing non-profit United Policyholders and five policyholders with an interest in New York al­location law. As Viking Pump explained, "[c]ourts across the country have grappled with so-called 'long-tail' claims — such as those seeking to re­cover for personal injuries due to toxic exposure and property damage resulting from gradual or continuing environmental contaminations — in the insurance context." Such claims "often in­volve exposure to an injury-inducing harm over the course of multiple policy periods, spawning litigation over which policies are triggered in the first instance, how liability should be allocated among triggered policies and the respective in­surers, and at what point insureds may turn to excess insurance for coverage."

"All Sums" in Response to Anti-Stacking Provisions

Viking Pump clarified New York law on two of these three issues, allocation among trig­gered policies and the availability of excess insurance upon exhaustion of underlying poli­cies. The New York high court addressed these issues on certified questions from the Delaware Supreme Court, in litigation brought by policy­holders facing multi-year asbestos exposure claims. Their excess policies included standard general liability insurance provisions promis­ing to pay "all sums" in excess of underlying insurance that they became liable to pay be­cause of personal injuries caused by an "occur­rence." The leading example of "all sums" allo­cation cited by the Viking Pump court was State of California v. Continental Ins. Co., 55 Cal.4th 186 (2012), in which Anderson Kill represented the prevailing policyholder. The Viking Pump poli­cies also included "non-cumulation" or "prior insurance" clauses that restrict coverage to the limits of a single period when injury or damage occurs over multiple insurance periods.

Such "anti-stacking" provisions led the court in Viking Pump to apply all sums alloca­tion. Since the 2002 Con Ed decision, insurance companies had argued for the pro rata rule to minimize their payout on long-tail claims under New York law regardless of policy lan­guage, even though Con Ed expressly acknowl­edged that "different policy language" might compel a different result and recognized that pro rata allocation was "not explicitly mandat­ed by the policies." The New York high court found the anti-stacking clauses in Viking Pump substantively distinguishable from Con Ed, noting it had "never addressed the interplay between non-cumulation/prior insurance pro­visions and allocation."

In policies containing such anti-stacking provisions, the court found that "all sums is the appropriate allocation method," agreeing that "it would be inconsistent with the language of the non-cumulation clauses to use pro rata allo­cation." The court reasoned that "[s]uch policy provisions plainly contemplate that multiple successive insurance policies can indemnify the insured for the same loss or occurrence by acknowledging that a covered loss or oc­currence may 'also [be] covered in whole or in part'" under prior policies. In contrast, "the very essence of pro rata allocation is that the in­surance policy language limits indemnification to losses and occurrences during the policy period — meaning that no two insurance poli­cies, unless containing overlapping or concur­rent policy periods, would indemnify the same loss or occurrence." Given these considerations the court observed that "[p]ro rata allocation is a legal fiction designed to treat continuous and indivisible injuries as distinct in each policy pe­riod as a result of the 'during the policy period' limitation, despite the fact that the injuries may not actually be capable of being confined to specific time periods." Accordingly, the Viking Pump court found that its prior Con Ed deci­sion "does not require pro rata allocation in the face of policy language undermining the very premise upon which the imposition of pro rata allocation rests."

Vertical Exhaustion

As to the exhaustion issue, the Viking Pump court adopted a "vertical exhaustion" rule, al­lowing policyholders to access each excess policy when the limits of immediately underly­ing primary and umbrella policies in the same period are depleted, even if other lower-level policies during different policy periods remain unexhausted. The court gave short shrift to the insurance companies' argument for "horizon­tal" exhaustion, under which an excess insur­ance policy would pay only after exhaustion of all the underlying primary and umbrella in­surance policies in every period of a continuing loss, noting that such policies before or after the excess policies were not in the excess poli­cies' schedules of underlying insurance. The court also noted that its prior Con Ed decision had concluded that "other insurance" clauses applied only to concurrent coverage and were not implicated in situations involving succes­sive insurance policies. Unlike the all sums al­location ruling, the vertical exhaustion ruling in Viking Pump was not limited to policies with anti-stacking provisions (e.g., non-cumulation or prior insurance clauses), but rather should apply to a broad range of excess liability insur­ance policies.

Policyholders nationwide as well as in New York should consider the broad implications of Viking Pump. Obviously, it directly benefits poli­cyholders with long-tail claims subject to New York law whose policies include anti-stacking language, and any New York policyholders whose claims are not finally resolved should double-check their policies for such language. But Viking Pump also should encourage poli­cyholders in states with unsettled allocation law, or states with pro rata rulings that failed to consider anti-stacking arguments, to continue fighting for their insurers to pay all sums of their liability, as promised. Viking Pump also is persuasive authority for rejecting unfavorable horizontal exhaustion arguments whenever an excess insurance policy's schedule of underly­ing insurance refers only to insurance in the particular policy period, which seems the uni­versal custom and practice.

More broadly, Viking Pump r eaffirms t hat "settled law" on coverage issues is settled only on the particular language in the policies on which it was decided. In subsequent cases, the contract language of the applicable insurance policies controls, and policyholders should continue to demand and to litigate as needed to get the coverage they reasonably expect, con­sistent with their own policy language and the facts of their claim.


Robert M. Horkovich is a shareholder in Anderson Kill's New York office, and chair of the firm's insurance recovery group. He is a trial lawyer with substantial experience in trying complex insurance coverage actions on behalf of corporate policyholders and has obtained over $5 billion in settlements and judgments from insurance companies for his clients over the past decade. | rhorkovich@andersonkill.com  

Edward J. ("Ted") Stein is a shareholder in the firm's Stamford, CT, and New York offices. His practice concentrates on insurance recovery, exclusively on behalf of policyholders, in matters involving fidelity, environmental, directors and officers, professional liability and other insurance coverage cases against U.S. and London market insurers. | estein@andersonkill.com


About Anderson Kill

Anderson Kill practices law in the areas of Insurance Recovery, Commercial Litigation, Environmental Law, Estates, Trusts and Tax Services, Corporate and Securities, Antitrust, Banking and Lending, Bankruptcy and Restructuring, Real Estate and Construction, Foreign Investment Recovery, Public Law, Government Affairs, Employment and Labor Law, Captive Insurance, Intellectual Property, Corporate Tax, Hospitality, and Health Reform. Recognized nationwide by Chambers USA for Client Service and Commercial Awareness, and best-known for its work in insurance recovery, the firm represents policyholders only in insurance coverage disputes - with no ties to insurance companies and has no conflicts of interest. Clients include Fortune 1000 companies, small and medium-sized businesses, governmental entities, and nonprofits as well as personal estates. Based in New York City, the firm also has offices in Philadelphia, PA, Stamford, CT, Washington, DC and Newark, NJ.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Authors
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
 
In association with
Related Topics
 
Similar Articles
Relevancy Powered by MondaqAI
Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP
Related Articles
 
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Tools
Print
Font Size:
Translation
Channels
Mondaq on Twitter
 
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
 
Email Address
Company Name
Password
Confirm Password
Position
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Accounting
 Anti-trust
 Commercial
 Compliance
 Consumer
 Criminal
 Employment
 Energy
 Environment
 Family
 Finance
 Government
 Healthcare
 Immigration
 Insolvency
 Insurance
 International
 IP
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Litigation
 Media & IT
 Privacy
 Real Estate
 Strategy
 Tax
 Technology
 Transport
 Wealth Mgt
Regions
Africa
Asia
Asia Pacific
Australasia
Canada
Caribbean
Europe
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
U.K.
United States
Worldwide Updates
Registration (you must scroll down to set your data preferences)

Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including your content preferences, for three primary purposes (full details of Mondaq’s use of your personal data can be found in our Privacy and Cookies Notice):

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting to show content ("Content") relevant to your interests.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, news alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our content providers ("Contributors") who contribute Content for free for your use.

Mondaq hopes that our registered users will support us in maintaining our free to view business model by consenting to our use of your personal data as described below.

Mondaq has a "free to view" business model. Our services are paid for by Contributors in exchange for Mondaq providing them with access to information about who accesses their content. Once personal data is transferred to our Contributors they become a data controller of this personal data. They use it to measure the response that their articles are receiving, as a form of market research. They may also use it to provide Mondaq users with information about their products and services.

Details of each Contributor to which your personal data will be transferred is clearly stated within the Content that you access. For full details of how this Contributor will use your personal data, you should review the Contributor’s own Privacy Notice.

Please indicate your preference below:

Yes, I am happy to support Mondaq in maintaining its free to view business model by agreeing to allow Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors whose Content I access
No, I do not want Mondaq to share my personal data with Contributors

Also please let us know whether you are happy to receive communications promoting products and services offered by Mondaq:

Yes, I am happy to received promotional communications from Mondaq
No, please do not send me promotional communications from Mondaq
Terms & Conditions

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd (Mondaq). Mondaq grants you a non-exclusive, revocable licence to access the Website and associated services, such as the Mondaq News Alerts (Services), subject to and in consideration of your compliance with the following terms and conditions of use (Terms). Your use of the Website and/or Services constitutes your agreement to the Terms. Mondaq may terminate your use of the Website and Services if you are in breach of these Terms or if Mondaq decides to terminate the licence granted hereunder for any reason whatsoever.

Use of www.mondaq.com

To Use Mondaq.com you must be: eighteen (18) years old or over; legally capable of entering into binding contracts; and not in any way prohibited by the applicable law to enter into these Terms in the jurisdiction which you are currently located.

You may use the Website as an unregistered user, however, you are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the Content or to receive the Services.

You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these Terms or with the prior written consent of Mondaq. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information from the Content. Nor shall you extract information about users or Contributors in order to offer them any services or products.

In your use of the Website and/or Services you shall: comply with all applicable laws, regulations, directives and legislations which apply to your Use of the Website and/or Services in whatever country you are physically located including without limitation any and all consumer law, export control laws and regulations; provide to us true, correct and accurate information and promptly inform us in the event that any information that you have provided to us changes or becomes inaccurate; notify Mondaq immediately of any circumstances where you have reason to believe that any Intellectual Property Rights or any other rights of any third party may have been infringed; co-operate with reasonable security or other checks or requests for information made by Mondaq from time to time; and at all times be fully liable for the breach of any of these Terms by a third party using your login details to access the Website and/or Services

however, you shall not: do anything likely to impair, interfere with or damage or cause harm or distress to any persons, or the network; do anything that will infringe any Intellectual Property Rights or other rights of Mondaq or any third party; or use the Website, Services and/or Content otherwise than in accordance with these Terms; use any trade marks or service marks of Mondaq or the Contributors, or do anything which may be seen to take unfair advantage of the reputation and goodwill of Mondaq or the Contributors, or the Website, Services and/or Content.

Mondaq reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to take any action that it deems necessary and appropriate in the event it considers that there is a breach or threatened breach of the Terms.

Mondaq’s Rights and Obligations

Unless otherwise expressly set out to the contrary, nothing in these Terms shall serve to transfer from Mondaq to you, any Intellectual Property Rights owned by and/or licensed to Mondaq and all rights, title and interest in and to such Intellectual Property Rights will remain exclusively with Mondaq and/or its licensors.

Mondaq shall use its reasonable endeavours to make the Website and Services available to you at all times, but we cannot guarantee an uninterrupted and fault free service.

Mondaq reserves the right to make changes to the services and/or the Website or part thereof, from time to time, and we may add, remove, modify and/or vary any elements of features and functionalities of the Website or the services.

Mondaq also reserves the right from time to time to monitor your Use of the Website and/or services.

Disclaimer

The Content is general information only. It is not intended to constitute legal advice or seek to be the complete and comprehensive statement of the law, nor is it intended to address your specific requirements or provide advice on which reliance should be placed. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the Content for any purpose. All Content provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq and/or its Contributors and other suppliers hereby exclude and disclaim all representations, warranties or guarantees with regard to the Content, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Mondaq expressly excludes all representations, warranties, obligations, and liabilities arising out of or in connection with all Content. In no event shall Mondaq and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use of the Content or performance of Mondaq’s Services.

General

Mondaq may alter or amend these Terms by amending them on the Website. By continuing to Use the Services and/or the Website after such amendment, you will be deemed to have accepted any amendment to these Terms.

These Terms shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of England and Wales and you irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of England and Wales to settle any dispute which may arise out of or in connection with these Terms. If you live outside the United Kingdom, English law shall apply only to the extent that English law shall not deprive you of any legal protection accorded in accordance with the law of the place where you are habitually resident ("Local Law"). In the event English law deprives you of any legal protection which is accorded to you under Local Law, then these terms shall be governed by Local Law and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with these Terms shall be subject to the non-exclusive jurisdiction of the courts where you are habitually resident.

You may print and keep a copy of these Terms, which form the entire agreement between you and Mondaq and supersede any other communications or advertising in respect of the Service and/or the Website.

No delay in exercising or non-exercise by you and/or Mondaq of any of its rights under or in connection with these Terms shall operate as a waiver or release of each of your or Mondaq’s right. Rather, any such waiver or release must be specifically granted in writing signed by the party granting it.

If any part of these Terms is held unenforceable, that part shall be enforced to the maximum extent permissible so as to give effect to the intent of the parties, and the Terms shall continue in full force and effect.

Mondaq shall not incur any liability to you on account of any loss or damage resulting from any delay or failure to perform all or any part of these Terms if such delay or failure is caused, in whole or in part, by events, occurrences, or causes beyond the control of Mondaq. Such events, occurrences or causes will include, without limitation, acts of God, strikes, lockouts, server and network failure, riots, acts of war, earthquakes, fire and explosions.

By clicking Register you state you have read and agree to our Terms and Conditions