United States: Timing Is Everything: The Seventh Circuit Clarifies The Ordinary Course Of Business Preference Defense

Last Updated: August 23 2016
Article by Peter C. Blain and Michael D. Jankowski

In bankruptcy preference litigation, timing issues are crucial.  Was a prebankruptcy payment made inside or outside of the 90‑day preference period?  Was new value given by the recipient of the payment to the debtor before or after receipt of payment, thereby providing a defense to avoidabilty?  Was the payment received in the preference period within a range that would constitute ordinary course based upon the parties' course of dealing prior to the 90-day preference period?

In a recent decision, The Unsecured Creditors Committee of Sparrer Sausage Co. v. Jason's Foods, Inc.,1 the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals provided some useful guidance on the application of Bankruptcy Code section 547(c)(2)2, the ordinary course of business preference defense. In Sparrer, the Seventh Circuit addressed the following issues:  (1) whether a bankruptcy court could appropriately truncate the number of transactions that establish the prepreference historical period range constituting ordinary course against which the alleged preference is measured; (2) the available methods to establish the historical period range; and (3) the appropriate application of the method, once selected. The bankruptcy court found that the defendant was liable for avoidable preferences totaling in excess of $300,000, a decision which was affirmed by the district court.  Based upon its analysis, the Seventh Circuit reversed, reducing the defendant's preference exposure to zero after applying the new value defense.

In its decision, the Seventh Circuit noted that the "subjective ordinary-course defense asks whether the payments the debtor made to the creditor during the preference period are consistent with the parties' practice before the preference period,"3 citing the court's prior decision, In re Tolona Pizza Products Corp.4  The test entails using the parties' prepreference period payment history to calculate a baseline for the parties' dealings and then comparing the preference period payments to that baseline.5

The Seventh Circuit also noted that calculating the baseline payment practices between the debtor and the creditor requires identifying a historical period that reflects the companies' typical payment practices, which should reflect payment practices before the onset of any financial distress.6 Although the parties in Sparrer stipulated to a historical period of February 2, 2010 to November 7, 2011, the bankruptcy court rejected the stipulation and considered only a truncated payment history up to April 15, 2011, citing the lateness of payments after that date.  Overruling the plaintiff's objection that the decision to truncate the period was inappropriate, the Seventh Circuit, while questioning the bankruptcy court's decision to disregard the parties' stipulation, nonetheless found that the record supported the bankruptcy court's decision because the percentage of invoices paid in 30 or more days after April 16, 2011 jumped nearly 40%.7

The Seventh Circuit then turned to the method the bankruptcy court used to determine the baseline historical range of payments against which the alleged preference payments were measured.  Citing In re Quebecor World (USA), Inc.,8 the Seventh Circuit noted that bankruptcy courts generally use two methods to calculate the prepreference period baseline range of payments. The first, the total-range method, uses the minimum and maximum invoice ages during the historical period to establish the range. While the court noted that this method provides a complete picture of the parties' relationship, it has been criticized because it has a tendency to skew the range by payments that are outliers.9 As an alternative to the total-range method, bankruptcy courts use the average-lateness method, which uses the average invoice age during the historical period to determine which payments made during the preference period were in the ordinary course of business.  This method may provide a more accurate depiction of ordinary course because it compensates for outlier payments.

In Sparrer, the bankruptcy court used the average-lateness method to establish the baseline range, even though none of the payments made during the historical period appeared to be extreme outliers. Rejecting the defendant's contention that the bankruptcy court should have used the total-range method, the Seventh Circuit held that the bankruptcy court's determination that the average lateness method better captured the parties' prepreference period payment relationship was sound and should not be upset.10

However, the Seventh Circuit found that the bankruptcy court's application of the average lateness method was problematic. The bankruptcy court determined that the average invoice age rose from 22 days to 27 days during the preference period. The Seventh Circuit expressed skepticism that a five‑day difference in the average invoice age was substantial enough to take a payment out of the ordinary course of business exception of Bankruptcy Code section 547(c)(2).  However, given the "fact-intensive, context specific nature of the ordinary-course defense," the court was unwilling to upset the bankruptcy court's decision on this basis.11

However, the bankruptcy court's conclusion that invoices paid more than 6 days on either side of the 22‑day average were outside of the ordinary course was clear error.  While the bankruptcy court used the Quebecor World "bucketing analysis" to support its conclusion, the facts in the two cases were very different. In Quebecor World, the average invoice age during the historical period was 27.56 days, whereas during the preference period, the average invoice age was 57.16 days—a nearly 30‑day difference.  Because of this disparity, the Quebecor World court grouped the historical-period invoices in buckets, revealing that 88% of them were paid between 11 and 40 days. Consequently, the Quebecor World court concluded that it was appropriate to expand the upper range to 45 days, making payments made 46 days or thereafter avoidable.  By contrast, the Sparrer court's historical range of 16  to 28 days, for which it offered no explanation, encompassed only 64% of the historical transactions. Adding 2 days to either side of the range, or a range of 14 to 30 days, captured 88% of the historical period transactions, which was much more in line with Quebecor World. The Seventh Circuit therefore concluded that the Sparrer court's range was not only too narrow, but was arbitrary. For those reasons, the Seventh Circuit reversed the bankruptcy court's decision.12

The Sparrer decision provides some useful guidance regarding the application of the ordinary course of business exception to preference avoidability under Code section 547(c)(2).  First, it instructs that the prepreference historical period can be truncated after the point the debtor experiences financial distress. Additionally, the Seventh Circuit appears to permit bankruptcy courts the discretion to use either the total-range method or the average-lateness method to determine the payment range that constitutes ordinary course of business within the prepreference period historical range. However, courts must use a range that captures the majority of transactions in the historical period or risk having their conclusions overturned as arbitrary.

It will be interesting to see whether bankruptcy courts will interpret the decision to expand the ordinary course of business defense to preference avoidance, making it more difficult to recover preferential transfers. This is particularly important because in many cases, the debtor's assets are fully encumbered, and preference collections often provide the only source of recovery for creditors.


1 Unsecured Creditors Comm. of Sparrer Sausage Co. v. Jason's Foods, Inc., No. 15-2356, 2016 WL 3213096 (7th Cir. June 10, 2016).

2 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532  (the "Code").

3 Sparrer, 2016 WL 3213096 at *2.

4 In re Tolona Pizza Prods. Corp., 3 F.3d 1029, 1032 (7th Cir. 1993).

5 Sparrer, 2016 WL 3213096 at *2.

6 Id. at *3.

7 Id.

8 In re Quebecor World (USA), Inc., 491 B.R. 379 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2013).

9 Sparrer, 2016 WL 3213096  at *4.

10 Id.

11 Id.

12 Id. at *5.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

To print this article, all you need is to be registered on Mondaq.com.

Click to Login as an existing user or Register so you can print this article.

Peter C. Blain
In association with
Related Video
Up-coming Events Search
Font Size:
Mondaq on Twitter
Register for Access and our Free Biweekly Alert for
This service is completely free. Access 250,000 archived articles from 100+ countries and get a personalised email twice a week covering developments (and yes, our lawyers like to think you’ve read our Disclaimer).
Email Address
Company Name
Confirm Password
Mondaq Topics -- Select your Interests
 Law Performance
 Law Practice
 Media & IT
 Real Estate
 Wealth Mgt
Asia Pacific
European Union
Latin America
Middle East
United States
Worldwide Updates
Check to state you have read and
agree to our Terms and Conditions

Terms & Conditions and Privacy Statement

Mondaq.com (the Website) is owned and managed by Mondaq Ltd and as a user you are granted a non-exclusive, revocable license to access the Website under its terms and conditions of use. Your use of the Website constitutes your agreement to the following terms and conditions of use. Mondaq Ltd may terminate your use of the Website if you are in breach of these terms and conditions or if Mondaq Ltd decides to terminate your license of use for whatever reason.

Use of www.mondaq.com

You may use the Website but are required to register as a user if you wish to read the full text of the content and articles available (the Content). You may not modify, publish, transmit, transfer or sell, reproduce, create derivative works from, distribute, perform, link, display, or in any way exploit any of the Content, in whole or in part, except as expressly permitted in these terms & conditions or with the prior written consent of Mondaq Ltd. You may not use electronic or other means to extract details or information about Mondaq.com’s content, users or contributors in order to offer them any services or products which compete directly or indirectly with Mondaq Ltd’s services and products.


Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers make no representations about the suitability of the information contained in the documents and related graphics published on this server for any purpose. All such documents and related graphics are provided "as is" without warranty of any kind. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers hereby disclaim all warranties and conditions with regard to this information, including all implied warranties and conditions of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title and non-infringement. In no event shall Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever resulting from loss of use, data or profits, whether in an action of contract, negligence or other tortious action, arising out of or in connection with the use or performance of information available from this server.

The documents and related graphics published on this server could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Changes are periodically added to the information herein. Mondaq Ltd and/or its respective suppliers may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) and/or the program(s) described herein at any time.


Mondaq Ltd requires you to register and provide information that personally identifies you, including what sort of information you are interested in, for three primary purposes:

  • To allow you to personalize the Mondaq websites you are visiting.
  • To enable features such as password reminder, newsletter alerts, email a colleague, and linking from Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to your website.
  • To produce demographic feedback for our information providers who provide information free for your use.

Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) do not sell or provide your details to third parties other than information providers. The reason we provide our information providers with this information is so that they can measure the response their articles are receiving and provide you with information about their products and services.

If you do not want us to provide your name and email address you may opt out by clicking here .

If you do not wish to receive any future announcements of products and services offered by Mondaq by clicking here .

Information Collection and Use

We require site users to register with Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) to view the free information on the site. We also collect information from our users at several different points on the websites: this is so that we can customise the sites according to individual usage, provide 'session-aware' functionality, and ensure that content is acquired and developed appropriately. This gives us an overall picture of our user profiles, which in turn shows to our Editorial Contributors the type of person they are reaching by posting articles on Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) – meaning more free content for registered users.

We are only able to provide the material on the Mondaq (and its affiliate sites) site free to site visitors because we can pass on information about the pages that users are viewing and the personal information users provide to us (e.g. email addresses) to reputable contributing firms such as law firms who author those pages. We do not sell or rent information to anyone else other than the authors of those pages, who may change from time to time. Should you wish us not to disclose your details to any of these parties, please tick the box above or tick the box marked "Opt out of Registration Information Disclosure" on the Your Profile page. We and our author organisations may only contact you via email or other means if you allow us to do so. Users can opt out of contact when they register on the site, or send an email to unsubscribe@mondaq.com with “no disclosure” in the subject heading

Mondaq News Alerts

In order to receive Mondaq News Alerts, users have to complete a separate registration form. This is a personalised service where users choose regions and topics of interest and we send it only to those users who have requested it. Users can stop receiving these Alerts by going to the Mondaq News Alerts page and deselecting all interest areas. In the same way users can amend their personal preferences to add or remove subject areas.


A cookie is a small text file written to a user’s hard drive that contains an identifying user number. The cookies do not contain any personal information about users. We use the cookie so users do not have to log in every time they use the service and the cookie will automatically expire if you do not visit the Mondaq website (or its affiliate sites) for 12 months. We also use the cookie to personalise a user's experience of the site (for example to show information specific to a user's region). As the Mondaq sites are fully personalised and cookies are essential to its core technology the site will function unpredictably with browsers that do not support cookies - or where cookies are disabled (in these circumstances we advise you to attempt to locate the information you require elsewhere on the web). However if you are concerned about the presence of a Mondaq cookie on your machine you can also choose to expire the cookie immediately (remove it) by selecting the 'Log Off' menu option as the last thing you do when you use the site.

Some of our business partners may use cookies on our site (for example, advertisers). However, we have no access to or control over these cookies and we are not aware of any at present that do so.

Log Files

We use IP addresses to analyse trends, administer the site, track movement, and gather broad demographic information for aggregate use. IP addresses are not linked to personally identifiable information.


This web site contains links to other sites. Please be aware that Mondaq (or its affiliate sites) are not responsible for the privacy practices of such other sites. We encourage our users to be aware when they leave our site and to read the privacy statements of these third party sites. This privacy statement applies solely to information collected by this Web site.

Surveys & Contests

From time-to-time our site requests information from users via surveys or contests. Participation in these surveys or contests is completely voluntary and the user therefore has a choice whether or not to disclose any information requested. Information requested may include contact information (such as name and delivery address), and demographic information (such as postcode, age level). Contact information will be used to notify the winners and award prizes. Survey information will be used for purposes of monitoring or improving the functionality of the site.


If a user elects to use our referral service for informing a friend about our site, we ask them for the friend’s name and email address. Mondaq stores this information and may contact the friend to invite them to register with Mondaq, but they will not be contacted more than once. The friend may contact Mondaq to request the removal of this information from our database.


This website takes every reasonable precaution to protect our users’ information. When users submit sensitive information via the website, your information is protected using firewalls and other security technology. If you have any questions about the security at our website, you can send an email to webmaster@mondaq.com.

Correcting/Updating Personal Information

If a user’s personally identifiable information changes (such as postcode), or if a user no longer desires our service, we will endeavour to provide a way to correct, update or remove that user’s personal data provided to us. This can usually be done at the “Your Profile” page or by sending an email to EditorialAdvisor@mondaq.com.

Notification of Changes

If we decide to change our Terms & Conditions or Privacy Policy, we will post those changes on our site so our users are always aware of what information we collect, how we use it, and under what circumstances, if any, we disclose it. If at any point we decide to use personally identifiable information in a manner different from that stated at the time it was collected, we will notify users by way of an email. Users will have a choice as to whether or not we use their information in this different manner. We will use information in accordance with the privacy policy under which the information was collected.

How to contact Mondaq

You can contact us with comments or queries at enquiries@mondaq.com.

If for some reason you believe Mondaq Ltd. has not adhered to these principles, please notify us by e-mail at problems@mondaq.com and we will use commercially reasonable efforts to determine and correct the problem promptly.